| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compliance automation | Security operations | 15% | 3 of 67 | 7% | 44 | accepted challenger | ▲+8Since September 2026: 8% → 15%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| GRC platforms | Security operations | 3% | 10 of 75 | 8% | 12 | accepted challenger | ▼−1Since September 2026: 5% → 4%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Business continuity management | Security operations | 2% | 12 of 114 | 11% | 9 | under 10 labels · led by LogicManager at 24% | |
| Third-party risk management | Security operations | 0% | 20 of 87 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by UpGuard at 55% | ▼−6Since September 2026: 6% → 0%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Breach and attack simulation | Security operations | 0% | 26 of 74 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Cymulate at 24% | |
| Vulnerability management platforms | Security operations | 0% | 74 of 77 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Rapid7 InsightVM at 30% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compliance automation | 8% | 15% | ▲+8Since September 2026: 8% → 15%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 3 of 67, unchanged |
| TPRM | 6% | 0% | ▼−6Since September 2026: 6% → 0%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 4 → 20 of 87 |
| Business continuity | 0% | 2% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. | New this edition | Rank 12 of 114, unchanged |
| GRC | 5% | 4% | ▼−1Since September 2026: 5% → 4%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 9 → 10 of 75 |
| BAS | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 26 of 74, unchanged |
| Vuln management | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 74 of 77, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 12 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Sprinto (Best for Startups) ... Known for transparent pricing and specifically designed for bootstrapped B2B SaaS companies” MiniMax M2.5 · Compliance automation · budget prompt · first choice
“with Sprinto standing out for startups and small teams scaling into their first compliance frameworks” Perplexity Sonar · GRC · budget prompt · first choice
“the best choice is usually Sprinto if you need a full compliance automation platform” Perplexity Sonar · Compliance automation · budget prompt · first choice
“The best compliance automation platform for a company with a limited budget is Sprinto” Llama 4 Maverick · Compliance automation · budget prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid pricier ones like Sprinto ($10K+/year)” Grok 4.20 · Business continuity · budget prompt · hard negative
“Sprinto (~$10K–$30K+/yr)” Kimi K2 · Compliance automation · budget prompt · hard negative
“even capable tools like Vanta, Drata, Secureframe, and Sprinto require significant internal investment to operate effectively” Perplexity Sonar · Compliance automation · negative prompt · soft negative
“Reviewers flag sync delays and browser quirks. Its Trustpilot page has complaints about upfront fees and refunds.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Compliance automation · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 234 of the 239 answers that named Sprinto and are not a share of its labels.
671 of the 787 domain citations in answers naming Sprinto came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 812 | undated | GRC, Compliance automation | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 433 | undated | |||
| Case study | 104 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 104 | undated | GRC, Compliance automation | ||
| Template or tool | 55 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 48 | undated | GRC, Compliance automation | ||
| Report or ebook | 41 | undated | GRC | ||
| News or press | 13 | undated | GRC | ||
| Conference or event | 4 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 1 | undated |
Every page sprinto.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Sprinto's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: sprinto.com, sprinto.com/pricing, trust.sprinto.com, sprinto.com/solutions/startups, sprinto.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Sprinto's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Sprinto, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Sprinto by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
Sprinto is among the products AI models recommend first in Compliance automation this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.