Small business=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 11 → 12 of 58
2 categories · Named, not rankedEramba
16Judge labels
6First choices
1Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
9 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Eramba was named 9 times in GRC and 1 other category, where Hyperproof led with 19%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business12 of 60
2%4 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market7 of 75
5%6 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise16 of 67
2%2 labels
under the label threshold
In grc · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Eramba for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRC platforms | Security operations | 5% | 7 of 75 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Hyperproof at 19% | ▲+6Since September 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Compliance automation | Security operations | 0% | 15 of 67 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Drata at 34% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Eramba held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · GRC · by segment
Mid-market▲+6Since September 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
6%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 5 pointsRank 19 → 6 of 69
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 37 → 14 of 65
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRC | 0% | 6% | ▲+6Since September 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 19 → 7 of 75 |
| Compliance automation | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 15 of 67, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Eramba across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Eramba across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained14 labels6
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Go with the free, self-hosted community versions of Eramba or SimpleRisk.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · GRC · budget prompt · first choice
“If you want to spend nothing at all, start with SimpleRisk or Eramba.” Mistral Small · GRC · budget prompt · first choice
“Very tight budget (<$2K) | SimpleRisk or Eramba” MiniMax M2.5 · GRC · budget prompt · first choice
“if you need zero software cost and can self-host/manage, Eramba/SimpleRisk are the cheapest” Muse Glimmer 30B · GRC · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Eramba, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Eramba was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Eramba, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Eramba was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Eramba. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 16 answers that named Eramba and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
zengrc.com11
complyjet.com10
orbiqhq.com7
riskwatch.com7
incorp.com6
saltycloud.com6
eramba.orgYour site5
grc-review.com5
simplerisk.com5
sourceforge.net5
Sixty-two of the sixty-seven domain citations in answers naming Eramba came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
eramba.org is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Eramba takes 5% of first choices and Hyperproof takes 19%.ShowHide
Search and answers
eramba.org is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Eramba takes 5% of first choices and Hyperproof takes 19%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “grc platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “grc platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 390 a month (“eramba”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 5 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 364 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 64 · 8 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 427
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
5%
rank 7 of 75 in GRC
Segment leader
19%
Hyperproof
- First choices
- 6 across its categories
- Named in
- 16 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 16 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on eramba.org
2,595
subdomains included
Content
97
counted in the table below
Documentation
4
Product · Integration
1 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Podcast or video | 69 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 12 | 1 | 2026-07-21 | ||
| Conference or event | 7 | 1 | 2026-08-21 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 7 | 0 | 2019-04-09 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | 0 | 2023-07-05 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | 0 | 2018-01-15 |
Most recent
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page eramba.org exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Eramba
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Eramba; a claim can dispute any of them.
Eramba (Open Source) 1
Follow Eramba
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Eramba is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Eramba is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Open, affordable software for risk, compliance, incidents and privacy. Flat annual fee, unlimited users, self-hosted or SaaS. Trusted for over a decade.
- Price stated
- Community on-premisesFree; Enterprise on-premises€2,500 / year; Enterprise SaaS, EU or US hosting€5,000 / year; Flat Fee: €5000/Year; Implementation workshops€800 each eramba.org
- Starting price
- Free eramba.org
- Free plan or trial
- Community on-premisesFree eramba.org
- Hosting
- EUUS
- Not stated on the pages read
- Who it is for, integrations, certifications, customers
What Eramba's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: eramba.org. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Eramba's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Eramba, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Eramba by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Eramba is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Eramba, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.