IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › Eramba · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Eramba

15Judge labels

1First choices

4Negative labels

7 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Eramba was named 5 times in GRC, where Vanta led with 14%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business11 of 71

under the label threshold

Mid-market19 of 77

under the label threshold

Enterprise38 of 47

under the label threshold

In grc · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Eramba for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
GRC platforms	Security operations	0%	19 of 77	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by Vanta at 14%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Eramba yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Eramba across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained11 labels1

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“or Eramba Community Edition if you have technical resources to self-host” Kimi K2 · GRC · budget prompt · alternative

“If you need full-featured open source: Evaluate CISO Assistant or Eramba” GLM 4.7 FlashX · GRC · budget prompt · alternative

“Best open-source / low-cost option to investigate: Eramba” Perplexity Sonar · GRC · budget prompt · alternative

“Eramba offers a free, self-hosted Community Edition” Gemini 3.5 Flash · GRC · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Eramba, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Eramba was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

SimpleRisk12 of 146Not in the top three

Vanta8 of 142Not in the top three

Drata8 of 141Not in the top three

RealCISO8 of 141Not in the top three

Hyperproof7 of 140Not in the top three

Sprinto6 of 142Not in the top three

Ethicontrol5 of 141Not in the top three

ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management5 of 141Not in the top three

MetricStream5 of 140Not in the top three

CISO Assistant3 of 141Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Eramba. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 14 answers that named Eramba and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

reddit.com10

brightdefense.com9

realciso.io8

complyjet.com7

grc-review.com7

orbiqhq.com7

spotsaas.com7

simplerisk.com6

enzuzo.com5

sourceforge.net5

Seventy-one of the seventy-one domain citations in answers naming Eramba came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

brightdefense.com/resources/grc-tools-for-smbs-and-startups9

reddit.com/r/cybersecurity/comments/1ay5u9v/what_grc_software_is_suitable_in_features_and9

realciso.io/grc-platform/for-small-business8

complyjet.com/blog/best-grc-software7

orbiqhq.com/compliance-automation/best-grc-software7

spotsaas.com/list/grc-platforms/for-small-business7

simplerisk.com/6

enzuzo.com/blog/best-grc-software5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Eramba's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Eramba, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at eramba.org is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.