Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 65 → 54 of 58
IBM · 6 categories · RankedIBM OpenPages
104Judge labels
1First choices
43Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
6Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in GRC for enterprise buyers
Rank 50 of 75 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 40% of its 10 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of IBM OpenPages →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business56 of 60
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market50 of 75
0%10 labels
criticized challenger
Enterprise9 of 67
2%30 labels
accepted challenger
In grc · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named IBM OpenPages for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRC platforms | Security operations | 0% | 50 of 75 | 40% | 10 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Business continuity management | Security operations | 0% | 30 of 114 | 25% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by LogicManager at 24% | |
| Third-party risk management | Security operations | 0% | 74 of 87 | 50% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by UpGuard at 55% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| AI governance platforms | Data platform | 0% | 133 of 135 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Credo AI at 18% | |
| Compliance automation | Security operations | 0% | 44 of 67 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Drata at 34% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Master data management | Data platform | 0% | 73 of 92 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Profisee MDM at 41% |
Movement
Since September 2026, IBM OpenPages held within the floor in all six categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · GRC · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 62 → 53 of 69
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 16 → 9 of 65
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRC | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 62 → 50 of 75 |
| Business continuity | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 30 of 114, unchanged |
| TPRM | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 30 → 74 of 87 |
| AI governance | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 133 of 135, unchanged |
| Compliance automation | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 29 → 44 of 67 |
| Master data | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 73 of 92, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated IBM OpenPages across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated IBM OpenPages across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct17 labels1
Paraphrase12 labelsNone
Comparative30 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained6 labelsNone
Scale-constrained5 labelsNone
Negative34 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative104 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“highly scalable platform renowned for risk quantification and operational risk” Gemini 3.5 Flash · GRC · comparative prompt · alternative
“AI‑assisted analysis and reporting; suited for large, data‑intensive programs” GLM 4.7 FlashX · TPRM · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for enterprise GRC: Riskonnect, ServiceNow BCM, IBM OpenPages, SAI360” Perplexity Sonar · Business continuity · comparative prompt · alternative
“better if BCM is part of a broader enterprise risk/governance program” GPT-5.4 mini · Business continuity · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Unlike legacy enterprise GRC systems (such as ServiceNow or IBM OpenPages) which are bloated and require six-month implementation cycles” Gemini 3.5 Flash · AI governance · direct prompt · hard negative
“IBM OpenPages: Given the age of some vulnerabilities, consider modern alternatives” GLM 4.7 FlashX · GRC · negative prompt · hard negative
“Enterprise suites (e.g., IBM OpenPages, OneTrust) can feel rigid or overkill for SMBs, with some G2 notes on steep learning curves.” Grok 4.20 · TPRM · negative prompt · soft negative
“without the overwhelming complexity or high costs of enterprise giants like ServiceNow, MetricStream, or IBM OpenPages” Grok 4.20 · GRC · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as IBM OpenPages, over the 104 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and IBM OpenPages was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as IBM OpenPages, over the 104 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and IBM OpenPages was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named IBM OpenPages. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 100 of the 104 answers that named IBM OpenPages and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
learn.g2.com39
vanta.com36
g2.com32
surecloud.com30
expertinsights.com27
gartner.com24
orbiqhq.com24
metricstream.com22
mitratech.com21
riskwatch.com21
276 of the 276 domain citations in answers naming IBM OpenPages came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where IBM OpenPages stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where IBM OpenPages stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 260 a month (“ibm openpages”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 20 a month
- Its own site
- It sits on IBM's site (ibm.com), so there are no site figures for it alone
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 50 of 75 in GRC
Segment leader
19%
Hyperproof
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 104 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 100 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as IBM OpenPages
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as IBM OpenPages; a claim can dispute any of them.
IBM InfoSphere / IBM OpenPages 1
Follow IBM OpenPages
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
IBM is the company behind IBM OpenPages.ShowHide
The company
IBM is the company behind IBM OpenPages.
ShowHideOn record
Company recordsIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Simplify how you manage risk and regulatory compliance with a unified GRC platform
- For
- CIO organization
- Hosting
- AWS
- Customers named
- Client ZeroCitiNavigator GasCNP Vita AssicuraIBM
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications
What IBM OpenPages's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: ibm.com/products/openpages, ibm.com/case-studies/openpages-grc, developer.ibm.com/articles/awb-ai-governance-ibm-openpages-as-a-service-aws, ibm.com/products/openpages/info, ibm.com/products/openpages/demo. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when IBM OpenPages's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as IBM OpenPages, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for IBM OpenPages by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where IBM OpenPages is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name IBM OpenPages, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.