Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 67 → 55 of 58
OneTrust · 2 categories · RankedOneTrust GRC
70Judge labels
3First choices
26Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
6% in GRC for enterprise buyers
Rank 72 of 75 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 50% of its 18 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of OneTrust GRC →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business57 of 60
0%13 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market72 of 75
0%18 labels
criticized challenger
Enterprise4 of 67
6%35 labels
accepted challenger
In grc · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named OneTrust GRC for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRC platforms | Security operations | 0% | 72 of 75 | 50% | 18 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Breach and attack simulation | Security operations | 0% | 70 of 74 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Cymulate at 24% |
Movement
Since September 2026, OneTrust GRC held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · GRC · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 28 → 66 of 69
Enterprise▲+3Since September 2026: 4% → 7%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
7%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 5 → 3 of 65
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRC | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 28 → 72 of 75 |
| BAS | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 70 of 74, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated OneTrust GRC across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated OneTrust GRC across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct10 labels3
Paraphrase4 labelsNone
Comparative21 labelsNone
Budget-constrained6 labelsNone
Scale-constrained11 labelsNone
Negative18 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative70 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“OneTrust has evolved into a robust GRC option especially suited for organizations where data privacy... are the primary drivers” Gemini 3.5 Flash · GRC · comparative prompt · alternative
“If privacy compliance is your top concern → OneTrust is purpose-built for this.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · GRC · comparative prompt · alternative
“Privacy, data, vendors, or AI governance are central? Include OneTrust.” GPT-6 Luna · GRC · comparative prompt · alternative
“OneTrust puts privacy operations at the center rather than alongside security” Claude Haiku 4.5 · GRC · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Reddit practitioners frequently say *"100% do not recommend"*” DeepSeek V4 Flash · GRC · negative prompt · hard negative
“Group B: Traditional/Enterprise GRC (Avoid for now)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · GRC · scale prompt · hard negative
“Aggressive sales, support drop-off after go-live, reporting gaps ... "stitched-together" feel across modules.” Grok 4.20 · GRC · negative prompt · soft negative
“it lacks depth in operational risk assessment, third-party supply chain risk, and internal audit management” Qwen 3.7 Flash · GRC · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as OneTrust GRC, over the 70 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and OneTrust GRC was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as OneTrust GRC, over the 70 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and OneTrust GRC was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named OneTrust GRC. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 63 of the 70 answers that named OneTrust GRC and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
vanta.com29
metricstream.com28
riskwatch.com24
complyjet.com22
orbiqhq.com21
zengrc.com21
enzuzo.com19
expertinsights.com19
surecloud.com18
cybersierra.co14
215 of the 215 domain citations in answers naming OneTrust GRC came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
onetrust.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, OneTrust GRC takes 0% of first choices and Hyperproof takes 19%.ShowHide
Search and answers
onetrust.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, OneTrust GRC takes 0% of first choices and Hyperproof takes 19%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “grc platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “grc platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 110 a month (“onetrust grc”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 10 a month
- Its company's site
- onetrust.com shared with OneTrust's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 54,294 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 8,113 · 818 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 56,044
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 72 of 75 in GRC
Segment leader
19%
Hyperproof
- First choices
- 3 across its categories
- Named in
- 70 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 63 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as OneTrust GRC
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as OneTrust GRC; a claim can dispute any of them.
OneTrust 16
Follow OneTrust GRC
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
OneTrust is the company behind OneTrust GRC.ShowHide
The company
OneTrust is the company behind OneTrust GRC.
ShowHideOn record
Company recordsIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- In this infographic, we cover the top 10 GRC drivers and trends that will impact the future of organizations, including fragmented internal data and systems.
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What OneTrust GRC's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: onetrust.com/resources/10-grc-trends-infographic, onetrust.com/glossary/governance-risk-and-compliance, onetrust.com/glossary/governance-risk-and-compliance-grc, onetrust.com/resources/leaders-leverage-grc-automation-infographic, onetrust.com/resources/grc-strategies-for-effective-ai-governance-oceg-research-report. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when OneTrust GRC's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as OneTrust GRC, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for OneTrust GRC by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where OneTrust GRC is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name OneTrust GRC, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.