GRC platforms for enterprise buyers
Asked as “GRC platform”, and as “governance, risk and compliance tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 50 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
24%
Contested · ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management 12%
24MetricStream12ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management08Vanta56others
24% of first choices, contested.
Since September 2026↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: MetricStream (25%) replaces ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management (36% then, 11% now), 14 points clear, past the 11-point floor.MetricStream leads at 25%, replacing ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, which led at 36% and stands at 11% now: 14 points clear, past the floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Vanta30%Contested▲+7Since September 2026: 22% → 29%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-market
Hyperproof19%Contested▲+3Since September 2026: 14% → 17%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Enterprise
MetricStream24%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: MetricStream (25%) replaces ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management (36% then, 11% now), 14 points clear, past the 11-point floor.This page
Vanta30%Contested▲+7Since September 2026: 22% → 29%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-marketHyperproof19%Contested▲+3Since September 2026: 14% → 17%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →EnterpriseMetricStream24%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: MetricStream (25%) replaces ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management (36% then, 11% now), 14 points clear, past the 11-point floor.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01MetricStream24%27%60criticized challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 21% → 25%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.21% → 25%
MetricStream24%27%60criticized challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 21% → 25%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.21% → 25%02
ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management12%28%64criticized challenger▼−25Since September 2026: 36% → 11%, −25 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.36% → 11%
ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management12%28%64criticized challenger▼−25Since September 2026: 36% → 11%, −25 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.36% → 11%03Vanta8%23%26accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 9% → 7%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.9% → 7%
Vanta8%23%26accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 9% → 7%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.9% → 7%04
OneTrust GRC6%20%35accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 4% → 7%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 7%
OneTrust GRC6%20%35accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 4% → 7%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 7%05
Drata6%22%27accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 9% → 7%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.9% → 7%
Drata6%22%27accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 9% → 7%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.9% → 7%06
AuditBoard2%4%23accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 2%
AuditBoard2%4%23accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 2%07
IBM OpenPages2%20%30accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
IBM OpenPages2%20%30accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%08
Optro2%0%12accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 2%
Optro2%0%12accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 2%09
LogicGate2%19%16accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
LogicGate2%19%16accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%10Hyperproof2%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
Hyperproof2%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%11
Archer2%43%51criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Archer2%43%51criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%Show the two products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
13
SAP GRC0%50%10criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
SAP GRC0%50%10criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%12
Diligent One0%0%11accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Diligent One0%0%11accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Hyperproof vs SecureframeHyperproof vs LogicGateHyperproof vs LogicGate Risk CloudHyperproof vs SprintoVanta vs ZenGRCVanta vs DrataVanta vs SecureframeVanta vs LogicGateVanta vs LogicGate Risk CloudVanta vs SprintoZenGRC vs DrataZenGRC vs SecureframeZenGRC vs LogicGateZenGRC vs LogicGate Risk CloudZenGRC vs SprintoDrata vs SecureframeDrata vs LogicGateDrata vs LogicGate Risk CloudDrata vs SprintoSecureframe vs LogicGateSecureframe vs LogicGate Risk CloudSecureframe vs SprintoLogicGate vs LogicGate Risk CloudLogicGate vs SprintoLogicGate Risk Cloud vs Sprinto
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01020304050607080910111213Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01MetricStream24%
MetricStream24%02ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management12%
ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management12%03Vanta8%
Vanta8%04OneTrust GRC6%
OneTrust GRC6%05Drata6%
Drata6%06AuditBoard2%
AuditBoard2%07IBM OpenPages2%
IBM OpenPages2%08Optro2%
Optro2%09LogicGate2%
LogicGate2%10Hyperproof2%
Hyperproof2%11Archer2%
Archer2%12Diligent One0%
Diligent One0%13SAP GRC0%
SAP GRC0%What they warned about
Three of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Archer43%
22 of 51 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“**Who should avoid**: Any enterprise without a dedicated in-house Archer administration team and significant integration budget.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
MetricStream27%
16 of 60 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Platforms to Avoid for Predictable Costs ... MetricStream | Per-user/module pricing | Unpredictable as user count grows” Kimi K2, budget prompt
ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management28%
18 of 64 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“**Avoid per-user pricing models** (ServiceNow, SAP) when scaling to thousands of users” Kimi K2, budget prompt
Drata22%
6 of 27 labels negative · 6 of 14 models
“such as Vanta, Drata, Secureframe, Sprinto, and Thoropass, which are described as better for smaller or mid-market teams” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
80 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1115 links across 235 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 3 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · MetricStream44 answers · 49 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Vanta33 answers · 46 citations · 10 models
33 answers · 40 citations · 11 models
vendor site · ZenGRC28 answers · 43 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Enzuzo26 answers · 26 citations · 11 models
vendor site · RiskWatch25 answers · 30 citations · 8 models
vendor site · SureCloud22 answers · 34 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Cyber Sierra19 answers · 32 citations · 9 models
vendor site · ComplyJet19 answers · 19 citations · 11 models
19 answers · 19 citations · 9 models
18 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
18 answers · 19 citations · 7 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
36 answers · 12 models
27 answers · 10 models
26 answers · 11 models
26 answers · 9 models
21 answers · 7 models
20 answers · 8 models
19 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best grc platform”, “grc platform”, “grc platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MetricStream metricstream.com MetricStream 24%, MetricStream Connected GRC 2%, MetricStream GRC 2% | 28% | 174 | 1,000 | 35 | 94,301 | $211 | 8 | 3 |
| ServiceNow parent site ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management 12% | 12% | 190 | 135,000 | 13,451 | ||||
| Vanta vanta.com | 8% | 500 | 40,500 | 1,219 | 72,260 | 120 | ||
| OneTrust onetrust.com OneTrust GRC 6% | 6% | 63 | 14,800 | 624 | 54,294 company | 58 | ||
| Drata drata.com | 6% | 390 | 9,900 | 257 | 36,413 | 54 | ||
| ZenGRC zengrc.com | 6% | 62 | 480 | 4 | 29,603 | 9 | ||
| Riskonnect riskonnect.com | 4% | 49 | 2,900 | 76 | 55,995 | 41 | 4 | |
| AuditBoard auditboard.com | 2% | 99 | 8,100 | 220 | 129 | 0 | ||
| IBM parent site IBM OpenPages 2% | 2% | 100 | 201,000 | 34,098 | ||||
| Optro optro.ai | 2% | 47 | 2,900 | 39 | 126,117 | $4,599 | 75 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (cybersierra.co, metricstream.com). The first result for “best grc platform” is reddit.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best GRC platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which governance, risk and compliance tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade GRC platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best GRC platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a GRC platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which GRC platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5RiskonnectMetricStreamChangedno first choiceagainst: RiskonnectCyber Sierraagainst: MetricStreamno first choiceagainst: Archer, MetricStream, OneTrust GRC, SAP GRC
Five alternatives
Centraleyes, Drata, IBM OpenPages, MetricStream, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementThree alternatives
Archer, IBM OpenPages, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementFive alternatives
Drata, LogicGate, MetricStream, SureCloud, VantaOne alternative
LogicGateGPT-5.4 miniMetricStream, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementChangedServiceNow Integrated Risk Managementagainst: ArcherHyperproofno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
AuditBoard, LogicGateFour alternatives
AuditBoard, MetricStream, Optro, WorkivaFive alternatives
Diligent One, IBM OpenPages, MetricStream, OneTrust GRC, RiskonnectFour alternatives
Archer, IBM OpenPages, RSA, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementGemini 3.5 FlashOptroDrata, VantaChangedOptroagainst: Archer, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementZenGRCDrata, Vantaagainst: Archer, Drata, IBM OpenPages, Jira, MetricStream, Secureframe, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, SharePoint, Sprinto, Vanta
Four alternatives
Drata, MetricStream, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, VantaFive alternatives
AuditBoard, Diligent One, MetricStream, OneTrust GRC, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementThree alternatives
Diligent One, LogicGate Risk Cloud, MetricStreamFour alternatives
Archer, Centraleyes, LogicGate Risk Cloud, WorkivaThree alternatives
AuditBoard, LogicGate, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementPerplexity SonarRiskonnectagainst: ArcherMetricStreamChangedagainst: Archer, AuditBoardIBM OpenPages, MetricStreamComplyJetagainst: ServiceNow Integrated Risk Managementno first choiceagainst: Archer, Drata, IBM OpenPages, MetricStream, SAP GRC, Secureframe, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, Sprinto, Thoropass, Vanta
Five alternatives
Drata, MetricStream, Secureframe, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, VantaTwo alternatives
IBM OpenPages, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementSix alternatives
Archer, AuditBoard, LogicGate, Resolver, SAP GRC, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementTwo alternatives
IBM OpenPages, MetricStreamGrok 4.1 FastMetricStreamMetricStreamHeldMetricStreamArcheragainst: LogicGate, MetricStream, OneTrust GRCno first choiceagainst: Archer, Drata, MetricStream, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, Vanta
Four alternatives
Archer, IBM OpenPages, LogicGate Risk Cloud, OneTrust GRCFour alternatives
Archer, AuditBoard, IBM OpenPages, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementFive alternatives
Archer, AuditBoard, IBM OpenPages, OneTrust GRC, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementOne alternative
ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementFour alternatives
Drata, Hyperproof, OneTrust GRC, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementMistral SmallMetricStream Connected GRC, OneTrust GRCMetricStreamChangedno first choiceagainst: ArcherServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementServiceNow Integrated Risk Managementagainst: Archer, Drata, MetricStream, Scrut Automation, Scytale, Secureframe, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, Sprinto, Thoropass, UpGuard, Vanta
Two alternatives
Drata, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementThree alternatives
Orbiq, RSA, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementTwo alternatives
Archer, MetricStreamFive alternatives
Archer, Diligent One, IBM OpenPages, MetricStream, OneTrust GRCDeepSeek V4 FlashAuditBoard, OneTrust GRCMetricStreamChangedagainst: ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementMetricStreamagainst: ArcherOnspringagainst: Archer, MetricStream, OneTrust GRC, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Managementno first choiceagainst: Archer, IBM OpenPages, MetricStreamagainst: Archer, IBM OpenPages, MetricStream, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, UpGuard
Six alternatives
Diligent One, Drata, IBM OpenPages, MetricStream, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, VantaTwo alternatives
Archer Integrated Risk Management, IBM OpenPagesFive alternatives
AuditBoard, LogicManager, OneTrust GRC, Riskonnect, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementOne alternative
SmartSuiteFive alternatives
Drata, Hyperproof, Secureframe, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, VantaLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceMetricStream GRCChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
IBM OpenPages, OrbiqQwen 3.7 FlashMetricStreamMetricStreamHeldMetricStream, OptroErambaagainst: LogicGate, OneTrust GRC, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementDrata, Vantaagainst: Archer, LogicManageragainst: Appian, Kissflow, Mendix, OneTrust GRC, Oracle E-GRC, SAP GRC, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, Wolters Kluwer
Four alternatives
Drata, OneTrust GRC, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, VantaTwo alternatives
Archer, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementFour alternatives
Archer, LogicGate, OneTrust GRC, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementOne alternative
SimpleRiskThree alternatives
Secureframe, Sprinto, WhisticKimi K2IBM OpenPagesMetricStreamChangedMetricStream6clicksagainst: Archer, MetricStream, SAP GRC, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Managementno first choiceagainst: Archer, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
Two alternatives
OneTrust GRC, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementTwo alternatives
Archer, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementSix alternatives
Archer, AuditBoard, LogicGate Risk Cloud, OneTrust GRC, SAI360, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementOne alternative
Cyber SierraFive alternatives
AuditBoard, Drata, Hyperproof, OneTrust GRC, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementGLM 4.7 FlashXMetricStream, OneTrust GRCServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementChangedMetricStreamLogicGate, ZenGRCagainst: Archerno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
AuditBoard, Mitratech Alyne, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementThree alternatives
Archer, IBM OpenPages, MetricStreamSix alternatives
AuditBoard, Drata, OneTrust GRC, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, SureCloud, VantaOne alternative
ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementMiniMax M2.5no first choiceno first choiceHeldArcherCoreStream GRC, ZenGRCagainst: Archer, IBM OpenPages, MetricStream, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Managementno first choiceagainst: Archer, MetricStream, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
Three alternatives
IBM OpenPages, MetricStream, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementTwo alternatives
Eramba, OpenGRCGPT-6 LunaVantaServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementChangedno first choiceSimpleRiskno first choiceagainst: Archer, Drata, MetricStream, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, Vanta
Two alternatives
MetricStream, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementThree alternatives
Archer, AuditBoard, MetricStreamEight alternatives
Archer, Diligent One, IBM OpenPages, MetricStream, OneTrust GRC, Optro, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, WorkivaOne alternative
ArcherMuse Glimmer 30BServiceNow Integrated Risk Management - IRM, formerly ServiceNow GRCMetricStreamChangedno first choiceSureCloudagainst: IBM OpenPages, LogicGate, MetricStream, OneTrust GRC, SAP GRC, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Managementno first choiceagainst: Archer, Drata, Hyperproof, MetricStream, OneTrust GRC, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, Vanta
Five alternatives
Archer, Diligent One, IBM OpenPages, LogicGate, OneTrust GRCThree alternatives
Archer, IBM OpenPages, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementThree alternatives
AuditBoard, Optro, ZenGRCBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:24 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:48 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:21 | yes | 11 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 12:07 | yes | 23 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 12:39 | yes | 24 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 13:39 | yes | 11 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:40 | yes | 23 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 12:52 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 13:47 | yes | 8 | 37 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:28 | yes | 15 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:12 | yes | 15 | 96 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:50 | yes | 7 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:27 | yes | 3 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:10 | yes | 14 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:57 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 13:45 | yes | 6 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:35 | yes | 7 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:03 | yes | 24 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:41 | yes | 22 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:52 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:03 | yes | 25 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 12:46 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 12:26 | yes | 9 | 33 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:32 | yes | 20 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 12:42 | yes | 15 | 165 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:53 | yes | 5 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:30 | yes | 3 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 07:27 | yes | 15 | 14 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 13:45 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:48 | yes | 8 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:38 | yes | 12 | 28 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 13:22 | yes | 19 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 07:51 | yes | 20 | 11 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 07:27 | yes | 13 | 9 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:04 | yes | 24 | 36 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 13:06 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 13:22 | yes | 15 | 95 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 07:52 | yes | 15 | 26 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:38 | yes | 23 | 33 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:34 | yes | 20 | 27 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 12:24 | yes | 10 | 46 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:08 | yes | 14 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 12:46 | yes | 16 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:46 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 12:44 | yes | 18 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:31 | yes | 20 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:22 | yes | 19 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:31 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:47 | yes | 24 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:06 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 13:18 | yes | 10 | 58 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:25 | yes | 22 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:25 | yes | 22 | 81 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:21 | yes | 19 | 44 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:27 | yes | 2 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:08 | yes | 22 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:32 | yes | 18 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:02 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:15 | yes | 10 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:21 | yes | 24 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:57 | yes | 13 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 13:24 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 12:59 | yes | 23 | 60 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 13:34 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 07:55 | no | 0 | 37 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:08 | yes | 14 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:01 | yes | 15 | 23 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 13:35 | yes | 5 | 13 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 13:21 | yes | 2 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:13 | yes | 20 | 39 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 07:28 | yes | 15 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:53 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:14 | yes | 26 | 31 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:02 | yes | 20 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:23 | yes | 22 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 12:18 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:08 | yes | 24 | 41 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:25 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 12:23 | no | 0 | 39 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:26 | yes | 25 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:23 | yes | 21 | 70 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 07:28 | yes | 18 | 36 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:15 | yes | 3 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 12:49 | yes | 19 | 35 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Diligent read as Diligent One
Diligent (Diligent One Platform) read as Diligent One
IBM read as IBM OpenPages
Mitratech read as Mitratech Alyne
OneTrust read as OneTrust GRC
SAP read as SAP GRC
ServiceNow read as ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
Unresolved, counted raw
Archer Integrated Risk Management (RSA)
Cybersierra
Mendix
MetricStream Connected GRC
Oracle E-GRC
Sayari
ServiceNow Governance, Risk and Compliance / Integrated Risk Management
ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management - IRM, formerly ServiceNow GRC
Wolters Kluwer (CaseWare)
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.