Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 70 → 58 of 58
ServiceNow · 6 categories · RankedServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
213Judge labels
9First choices
97Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
6Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
12% in GRC for enterprise buyers
Rank 74 of 75 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 57% of its 42 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management →By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
Small business60 of 60
0%28 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market74 of 75
0%42 labels
criticized challenger
Enterprise2 of 67
12%64 labels
criticized challenger
In grc · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRC platforms | Security operations | 0% | 74 of 75 | 57% | 42 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Business continuity management | Security operations | 0% | 88 of 114 | 50% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by LogicManager at 24% | |
| Compliance automation | Security operations | 0% | 67 of 67 | 67% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Drata at 34% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Breach and attack simulation | Security operations | 0% | 72 of 74 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Cymulate at 24% | |
| Cyber risk quantification | Security operations | 0% | 103 of 116 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by CyberSaint CyberStrong at 25% | |
| Third-party risk management | Security operations | 0% | 80 of 87 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by UpGuard at 55% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management held within the floor in all six categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · GRC · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 74 → 68 of 69
Enterprise▼−25Since September 2026: 36% → 11%, −25 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
11%from 36% in September 2026
Cleared the floor by 14 pointsRank 1 → 2 of 65
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRC | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 74 of 75, unchanged |
| Business continuity | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 88 of 114, unchanged |
| Compliance automation | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 31 → 67 of 67 |
| BAS | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 72 of 74, unchanged |
| Cyber risk quant | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 103 of 116, unchanged |
| TPRM | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 71 → 80 of 87 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 8 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 11 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct32 labels2
Paraphrase31 labels4
Comparative46 labels3not counted in share
Budget-constrained22 labels2
Scale-constrained29 labels1
Negative53 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative213 labels in all, every segment counted; 9 of the 13 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“ServiceNow and Fusion Risk Management are top choices.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Business continuity · comparative prompt · first choice
“Best overall enterprise workflow platform: ServiceNow” GPT-5.4 mini · GRC · comparative prompt · first choice
“If your organization already uses ServiceNow or plans to implement it, ServiceNow GRC would provide the most seamless integration” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Business continuity · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Suitable for organizations already on the ServiceNow platform, moderate complexity, and mid-to-large enterprises.” Llama 4 Maverick · GRC · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Group B: Traditional/Enterprise GRC (Avoid for now) *Examples:* ServiceNow, OneTrust, RSA Archer.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · GRC · scale prompt · hard negative
“licensed as expensive add-on; customization requires platform expertise; can feel bloated” Kimi K2 · GRC · negative prompt · hard negative
“"I get more complaints on ServiceNow for GRC than any other solution"” GLM 4.7 FlashX · GRC · negative prompt · hard negative
“Legacy GRC Systems (e.g., Archer, ServiceNow GRC, Diligent) for SMBs” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Compliance automation · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, over the 213 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, over the 213 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 190 of the 213 answers that named ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
vanta.com90
orbiqhq.com68
complyjet.com58
metricstream.com56
riskwatch.com56
expertinsights.com50
zengrc.com49
g2.com41
surecloud.com40
enzuzo.com39
547 of the 547 domain citations in answers naming ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 90 a month (“servicenow integrated risk management”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 6 a month
- Its own site
- It sits on ServiceNow's site (servicenow.com), so there are no site figures for it alone
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 74 of 75 in GRC
Segment leader
19%
Hyperproof
- First choices
- 9 across its categories
- Named in
- 213 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 190 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management; a claim can dispute any of them.
ServiceNow GRC 24ServiceNow 20ServiceNow IRM 8ServiceNow (GRC Pro) 1ServiceNow (Incident & Crisis Management) 1ServiceNow GRC (Integrated Risk Management) 1ServiceNow GRC / IRM (Integrated Risk Management) 1ServiceNow GRC / ServiceNow IRM 1ServiceNow Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) 1ServiceNow IRM (Integrated Risk Management) 1
Follow ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
ServiceNow is the company behind ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management.ShowHide
The company
ServiceNow is the company behind ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management.
ShowHideOn record
Company recordsIs this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.