IT AI Index
Index Vendors › ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management · September 2026 Edition
ServiceNow · 3 categories · Ranked

ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management

148Judge labels
18First choices
75Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
3Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
36% in GRC for enterprise buyers
Rank 77 of 77 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 60% of its 35 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
In grc · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
GRC platformsSecurity operations0%77 of 7760%35criticized challenger
Compliance automationSecurity operations0%32 of 5433%6under 10 labels · led by Drata at 37%
Third-party risk managementSecurity operations0%71 of 72100%3under 10 labels · led by UpGuard at 53%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini11125
Gemini 3.5 Flash00156
Perplexity Sonar00112
Grok 4.1 Fast00134
Mistral Small01203
DeepSeek V4 Flash02068
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash02035
Kimi K201034
GLM 4.7 FlashX02024
MiniMax M2.501113

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct23 labels5
Paraphrase21 labels7
Comparative31 labels4not counted in share
Budget-constrained20 labels6
Scale-constrained19 labelsNone
Negative34 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative148 labels in all, every segment counted; 18 of the 22 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you want workflow automation across the enterprise, start with ServiceNow.” GPT-5.4 mini · GRC · comparative prompt · first choice
“For enterprises, Mitratech Alyne or ServiceNow GRC offer the most customization and integration options.” Mistral Small · Compliance automation · comparative prompt · alternative
“ServiceNow specifically wins out if an enterprise already runs their entire operations on ServiceNow” Qwen 3.7 Flash · GRC · comparative prompt · alternative
“Seamless integration with ServiceNow platform | Organizations already using ServiceNow” GLM 4.7 FlashX · GRC · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“older or heavily customized configurations of ServiceNow GRC ... Verdict: Avoid these unless you are a massive, highly regulated global enterprise” Gemini 3.5 Flash · TPRM · negative prompt · hard negative
“enterprise suites like ServiceNow, OneTrust, or MetricStream (which often cost six figures and require months of setup) are out of the question” Gemini 3.5 Flash · GRC · budget prompt · hard negative
“ServiceNow GRC (IRM) — *Highest Caution*ceived more complaints about ServiceNow for GRC than any other solution” Kimi K2 · GRC · negative prompt · hard negative
“skip full enterprise platforms (ServiceNow GRC, MetricStream, Archer)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · GRC · direct prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, over the 148 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
MetricStream98 of 1489Not in the top three
Drata91 of 14817Not in the top three
Archer91 of 1482Not in the top three
Vanta87 of 14827Not in the top three
OneTrust71 of 1482Not in the top three
AuditBoard59 of 1484Not in the top three
Hyperproof47 of 1485Not in the top three
Sprinto41 of 1484Not in the top three
Secureframe39 of 1483Not in the top three
IBM OpenPages33 of 1480Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 112 of the 148 answers that named ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

expertinsights.com52
vanta.com45
orbiqhq.com43
enzuzo.com34
metricstream.com34
gartner.com33
apono.io31
riskwatch.com31
riskonnect.com29
complyjet.com28

360 of the 360 domain citations in answers naming ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management; a claim can dispute any of them.
ServiceNow GRC 24ServiceNow 6ServiceNow GRC (IRM) 4ServiceNow IRM 4ServiceNow GRC / IRM 2ServiceNow GRC/IRM 1ServiceNow Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC/IRM) 1ServiceNow IRM (Integrated Risk Management) 1ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management (IRM) 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at servicenow.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack