Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 17 → 16 of 58
5 categories · RankedHyperproof
149Judge labels
17First choices
21Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
5Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
19% in GRC for mid-market buyers
Rank 1 of 75 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
5 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 3% of its 30 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Hyperproof →By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
Small business16 of 60
0%17 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market1 of 75
19%30 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise12 of 67
2%10 labels
accepted challenger
In grc · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Hyperproof for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRC platforms | Security operations | 19% | 1 of 75 | 3% | 30 | accepted challenger | ▲+3Since September 2026: 12% → 15%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Compliance automation | Security operations | 0% | 12 of 67 | 11% | 28 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Third-party risk management | Security operations | 0% | 23 of 87 | 20% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by UpGuard at 55% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Cyber risk quantification | Security operations | 0% | 28 of 116 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by CyberSaint CyberStrong at 25% | |
| Business continuity management | Security operations | 0% | 103 of 114 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by LogicManager at 24% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Hyperproof held within the floor in all five categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · GRC · by segment
Mid-market▲+3Since September 2026: 12% → 15%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
15%from 12% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 2 of 69, unchanged
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 9 → 12 of 65
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRC | 12% | 15% | ▲+3Since September 2026: 12% → 15%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 2 → 1 of 75 |
| TPRM | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 11 → 23 of 87 |
| Compliance automation | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 14 → 12 of 67 |
| Cyber risk quant | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 28 of 116, unchanged |
| Business continuity | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 103 of 114, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Hyperproof across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Hyperproof across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 8 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 8 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 9 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 7 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct27 labels6
Paraphrase17 labels6
Comparative35 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained18 labels3
Scale-constrained32 labels2
Negative20 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative149 labels in all, every segment counted; 17 of the 19 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If I had to pick one default recommendation for a typical mid-sized B2B firm, I'd choose Hyperproof” Perplexity Sonar · GRC · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For most mid-market B2B companies, the practical sweet spot is Hyperproof (if you manage 3+ frameworks)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · GRC · direct prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Hyperproof as a strong starting point for a governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) tool.” Grok 4.20 · GRC · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Group A: Modern, AI-Native GRC (Best Fit) *Examples:* Vanta, Drata, Secureframe, Hyperproof.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · GRC · scale prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Some tools, like Hyperproof, are strong in control management and evidence collection but lack deep enterprise risk integration or advanced reporting.” Mistral Small · Compliance automation · negative prompt · soft negative
“Hyperproof is a compliance-first platform with limited features for business continuity management” Llama 4 Maverick · Business continuity · comparative prompt · soft negative
“SMB-focused ones like Hyperproof or Vendict lack depth for B2B-scale vendor portfolios” Grok 4.20 · TPRM · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“good platforms, but typically positioned for larger programs and higher price points” GPT-5.4 mini · GRC · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Hyperproof, over the 149 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Hyperproof was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Hyperproof, over the 149 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Hyperproof was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Hyperproof. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 142 of the 149 answers that named Hyperproof and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
vanta.com78
complyjet.com54
orbiqhq.com51
riskwatch.com44
expertinsights.com42
sprinto.com34
surecloud.com34
g2.com31
optro.ai30
enzuzo.com26
424 of the 424 domain citations in answers naming Hyperproof came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where Hyperproof stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where Hyperproof stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “grc platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “grc platforms”
2
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,600 a month (“hyperproof”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 37 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 64,238 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 6,523 · 684 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,647
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 2 clicks and $59 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
19%
rank 1 of 75 in GRC
First choices
17
across its categories
- Named in
- 149 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 142 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on hyperproof.io
604
subdomains included
Content
122
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
31 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 79 | 14 | 2026-09-14 | GRC | |
| Case study | 23 | 0 | 2026-01-22 | GRC | |
| Glossary or explainer | 9 | 0 | 2025-11-03 | ||
| Template or tool | 7 | 0 | 2025-03-27 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 1 | 0 | 2022-06-03 | ||
| Report or ebook | 1 | 0 | 2020-05-15 | ||
| Comparison | 1 | 0 | 2023-08-31 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-14How to prioritize implementing new compliance frameworks gate blog
- 2026-09-04Operationalizing compliance for ma and ipo blog
- 2026-09-04Operationalizing compliance for ma and ipo gate blog
- 2026-08-19Global control eu compliance gate blog
- 2026-08-19Global control eu compliance blog
- 2026-08-125 key moves to build a grc program that measures up blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page hyperproof.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Hyperproof
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Hyperproof is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Hyperproof is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The GRC Platform That Makes Compliance Easy
- For
- your team, the people doing the work
- Integrations claimed
- 200 hyperproof.io
- Certifications
- FedRAMP Certified Class C (Rev5)GDPRSOC2Pen TestSOC 2® Type 2SOC 2 Type II compliance
- Hosting
- United States
- Customers named
- OutSystemsAcuity InternationalAppianThalesArtemis HealthAGDATAHyperproof and HyperComplyAppLovin
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial
What Hyperproof's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: hyperproof.io, trust.hyperproof.io, hyperproof.io/product, hyperproof.io/case-studies, hyperproof.io/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Hyperproof's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Hyperproof, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Hyperproof by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Hyperproof is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Hyperproof, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Hyperproof is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Hyperproof is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideAI models recommend Hyperproof first in GRC platforms this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.