Business continuity management
Asked as “business continuity management platform”, and as “business continuity planning software”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 54 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each. Added to the September 2026 Edition; its answers are read by the distilled judge (ai-indexes-judge-qwen3-14b-run3), not the claude-opus-5 judge of the earlier categories: how the two compare.
Standing · first-choice share
24%
Contested · SafetyCulture 15%
24LogicManager15SafetyCulture09ParaSolution52others
24% of first choices, contested.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the seven products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02P03
04
05
06C07
B08
09
10
11F12
13
14Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01LogicManager24%
LogicManager24%02SafetyCulture15%
SafetyCulture15%03ParaSolution9%
04Quantivate7%
Quantivate7%05Preparis6%
Preparis6%06Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience4%
Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience4%07Continuity22%
08BC in the Cloud0%
09Noggin0%
Noggin0%10ServiceNow BCM0%
ServiceNow BCM0%11Everbridge 3600%
Everbridge 3600%12Fusion Risk Management0%
13MetricStream Business Continuity Management0%
MetricStream Business Continuity Management0%14Archer0%
Archer0%What they warned about
Five of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Everbridge 36041%
7 of 17 labels negative · 6 of 12 models · 2 hard negative
“users frequently criticize its BCM capabilities... Why to avoid: Users report that the interface is clunky.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Fusion Risk Management
50%
8 of 16 labels negative · 6 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“it is notorious for its complexity... Why to avoid: It has a steep learning curve.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience25%
7 of 28 labels negative · 6 of 12 models
“Legacy GRC Suites (e.g., Riskonnect, Archer, MetricStream) - These platforms are often criticized for being overly complex, difficult to implement, and not user-friendly.” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Archer64%
9 of 14 labels negative · 5 of 12 models
“heavy enterprise platforms (such as ServiceNow BCM, Archer, or highly customized Fusion Risk Management installations) are often overkill” Gemini 3.5 Flash, scale prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the twelve in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
78 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 974 links across 162 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.
vendor site · G249 answers · 49 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Fortiv44 answers · 66 citations · 11 models
42 answers · 42 citations · 11 models
vendor site · G235 answers · 64 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Mitratech33 answers · 40 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Sprinto32 answers · 32 citations · 12 models
31 answers · 31 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Riskonnect30 answers · 31 citations · 12 models
vendor site · ClickUp28 answers · 28 citations · 9 models
vendor site · SureCloud27 answers · 27 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Guideflow21 answers · 21 citations · 10 models
21 answers · 21 citations · 10 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
49 answers · 13 models
42 answers · 11 models
37 answers · 11 models
32 answers · 12 models
31 answers · 11 models
28 answers · 9 models
27 answers · 10 models
26 answers · 9 models
26 answers · 9 models
26 answers · 11 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best business continuity management platform”, “business continuity management platform”, “business continuity management platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LogicManager logicmanager.com | 24% | 43 | 320 | 9 | 8,388 | ||
| SafetyCulture safetyculture.com | 15% | 73 | 18,100 | 132 | 466,981 | 1 | |
| ParaSolution | 9% | 10 | 2 | ||||
| Quantivate quantivate.com | 7% | 32 | 260 | 6 | 1,533 | ||
| Mitratech mitratech.com Mitratech Preparis 6%, Mitratech Continuity Planning 2% | 7% | 7 | 3,600 | 159 | 46,305 company | $10,768 | 106 |
| Preparis preparis.com | 6% | 45 | 390 | 13 | 351 | $28 | 9 |
| Riskonnect BCM riskonnect.com Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience 4%, Riskonnect BCM 0% | 4% | 89 | 55,995 | 41 | |||
| SureCloud surecloud.com | 4% | 31 | 70 | 4 | 178 | ||
| Aptien aptien.com | 4% | 10 | 260 | 1 | 116,286 | 1 | |
| BCMMetrics bcmmetrics.com | 4% | 18 | 0 | 938 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 24 sites; 1 of them are among the sites the models cited here (g2.com). The first result for “best business continuity management platform” is myhospitalnow.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best business continuity management platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which business continuity planning software would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top business continuity management platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best business continuity management platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a business continuity management platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which business continuity management platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5SprintoMitratech Continuity PlanningChangedno first choiceBCMMetrics, Quantivateno first choiceagainst: Cohesity, Commvault, Datto, Drata, Druva, Everbridge 360, SAI360, Vanta
Three alternatives
Continuity2, Mitratech Continuity Planning, QuantivateThree alternatives
BC in the Cloud, LogicManager BCM, Riskonnect Business Continuity & ResilienceFour alternatives
BC in the Cloud, Continuity2, Fusion Framework System, ParaSolutionGPT-5.4 miniRiskonnect Business Continuity & ResilienceMitratech Preparis, Riskonnect Business Continuity & ResilienceChangedBC in the Cloud, Everbridge 360 AI PrepareC-BCMagainst: BC in the Cloudno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Continuity2, Everbridge 360, IBM OpenPagesOne alternative
Beacon BCMSThree alternatives
Castellan, Diligent, MetricStream Business Continuity ManagementTwo alternatives
Continuity2, SafetyCultureGemini 3.5 FlashMitratech Preparis, ParaSolutionagainst: Archer, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementPreparisChangedagainst: Fusion Risk Management, ServiceNow BCMFusion Framework SystemMittiagainst: Archer, Fusion Framework, Riskonnect Business Continuity & ResiliencePreparisagainst: Archer, Fusion Risk Management, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, ServiceNow BCMagainst: Archer, Fusion Risk Management
Three alternatives
Quantivate, Sprinto, VeociThree alternatives
Continuity2, LogicManager, ParaSolutionSix alternatives
Archer Business Resiliency, LogicManager, ParaSolution, Preparis, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, ServiceNow BCMFour alternatives
KingsBridge SHIELD, Open Resilience, Preparis, Zmanda ProThree alternatives
BC in the Cloud, Continuity2, SprintoPerplexity SonarSureCloudQuantivateChangedno first choicePreparisno first choiceagainst: Drata, Fusion Risk Management, Ncontracts, Quantivate, ServiceNow BCM, Vanta
Two alternatives
LogicManager, QuantivateThree alternatives
BC in the Cloud, LogicManager, SafetyCultureNine alternatives
Everbridge BC in the Cloud, Fusion Risk Management, IBM OpenPages, Mitratech Preparis, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, SAI360, SafetyCulture, ServiceNow BCM, SprintoTwo alternatives
Quantivate, SafetyCultureGrok 4.1 FastLogicManagerLogicManagerHeldagainst: Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementFusion Framework System, Riskonnect BCMSafetyCultureagainst: Everbridge 360, Resolver, SprintoParasoft/ParaSolutionagainst: IBM OpenPages, MetricStream Business Continuity Managementagainst: Archer, ComplyScore, Continuity2, Everbridge 360, GlobalSuite, MetricStream Business Continuity Management, Noggin, Veoci
Two alternatives
BC in the Cloud, Everbridge 360Four alternatives
BC in the Cloud, Everbridge 360, Fusion Framework, PreparisFive alternatives
Archer Resilience Management, MetricStream Business Continuity Management, Noggin, ServiceNow BCM, SureCloudFour alternatives
NIST, ParaSolution, Ready.gov, SureCloudFour alternatives
Everbridge 360, Fusion Framework, SafetyCulture, monday serviceMistral SmallLogicManagerLogicManagerHeldno first choiceAptien, SafetyCultureno first choiceagainst: Acronis Cyber Protect, Archer, Arcserve Continuous Availability, Datto SIRIS, MetricStream Business Continuity Management, Ncontracts, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, ServiceNow BCM
Four alternatives
BC in the Cloud, Copla, Quantivate, SafetyCultureTwo alternatives
Quantivate, SafetyCultureOne alternative
NAKIVO Backup & ReplicationDeepSeek V4 FlashLogicManager, SureCloudContinuity2ChangedFortivagainst: ServiceNow BCMSafetyCultureno first choiceagainst: Fusion Risk Managementagainst: Everbridge 360, Fusion Framework, IBM OpenPages, Noggin, RS Archer
Four alternatives
BC in the Cloud, Copla, Noggin, ParaSolutionFour alternatives
Castellan, Fortiv, Noggin, ParaSolutionFive alternatives
Archer, Continuity2, Fusion Risk Management, Noggin, Riskonnect Business Continuity & ResilienceTwo alternatives
IDrive Business, PreparisLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceSafetyCultureChangedno first choiceagainst: HyperproofParaSolutionno first choiceagainst: Continuity2, Drata, Noggin, Vanta
Four alternatives
BC in the Cloud, Copla, LogicManager, QuantivateQwen 3.7 FlashLogicManageragainst: Archer, IBM QRadar SOARLogicManagerHeldParaSolution, alive-ITSafetyCultureagainst: Fusion Risk Management, Resolverno first choiceagainst: Archer, Excel, LogicGate, MetricStream Business Continuity Management, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
Five alternatives
Everbridge 360, Interos, OnSolve, Resilinc, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementTwo alternatives
Continuity Logic, QuantivateThree alternatives
Archer Resilience Management, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, ServiceNow BCMThree alternatives
BC in the Cloud, ContinuityOne, PreparisKimi K2ParaSolutionagainst: Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementParaSolutionHeldagainst: FusionServiceNow Business Continuity ManagementSafetyCultureno first choiceagainst: Fusion Risk Management, Noggin, ParaSolutionagainst: BC in the Cloud, Castellan Solutions, Everbridge 360, Microsoft Business Contact Manager
Four alternatives
BC in the Cloud, LogicManager, Noggin, SafetyCultureThree alternatives
BC in the Cloud, Quantivate, Riskonnect BCMFour alternatives
Fusion Framework System, Onspring Business Continuity, ParaSolution, Riskonnect Business Continuity & ResilienceThree alternatives
BDRSuite, ParaSolution, PreparisGLM 4.7 FlashXLogicManagerLogicManagerHeldFusion Risk Management, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementSafetyCultureno first choiceagainst: Archer, Continuity Software, Everbridge 360, Fusion Risk Management, GlobalSuite, MetricStream Business Continuity Management, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience
Two alternatives
MeridianBCMS, Riskonnect BCMTwo alternatives
Resolver, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementSix alternatives
Continuity2, Mitratech, Noggin, ParaSolution, Quantivate, Riskonnect Business Continuity & ResilienceOne alternative
Comet BackupMiniMax M2.5LogicManager, QuantivateLogicManager, ParaSolutionChangedRiskonnect Business Continuity & ResilienceAWS Business Continuity, ISO 22301 Templates & Documentation Tools, Microsoft Azure Business Continuityno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Riskonnect BCM, SureCloudOne alternative
MeridianBCMSSeven alternatives
Archer Resilience Management, Everbridge 360, Fusion Framework System, IBM OpenPages, Noggin, ParaSolution, QuantivateThree alternatives
LogicGate, Premier Continuum, ResolverBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 00:04 | yes | 12 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 00:25 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 00:03 | yes | 20 | 32 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 22:41 | yes | 19 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 22:42 | yes | 21 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 00:01 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 01:00 | yes | 10 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 01:21 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 22:52 | no | 0 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 22:34 | yes | 19 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 22:55 | yes | 19 | 61 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 01:21 | yes | 5 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 00:44 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 22:38 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 00:06 | yes | 15 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 01:44 | yes | 19 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 22:41 | yes | 23 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 01:42 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 01:26 | yes | 17 | 53 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 22:41 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 23:33 | yes | 9 | 36 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 23:42 | yes | 12 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 00:06 | yes | 10 | 101 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 01:13 | yes | 5 | 21 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 22:59 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 01:00 | yes | 6 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 00:15 | yes | 13 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 01:33 | yes | 20 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 01:13 | yes | 19 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 01:49 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 22:30 | yes | 19 | 40 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 23:27 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 00:15 | yes | 12 | 52 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 00:05 | yes | 14 | 25 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 23:55 | yes | 14 | 164 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 01:46 | yes | 23 | 44 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 23:36 | yes | 9 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 23:51 | yes | 4 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 01:49 | yes | 13 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 00:07 | yes | 18 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 01:29 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 00:21 | yes | 9 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 01:04 | yes | 18 | 43 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 01:42 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 00:10 | yes | 23 | 187 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 00:05 | yes | 10 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 00:30 | yes | 23 | 184 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 01:05 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 01:19 | yes | 15 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 01:26 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 00:16 | yes | 9 | 23 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 01:08 | yes | 19 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 00:54 | yes | 13 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 00:37 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 23:50 | yes | 22 | 41 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 01:44 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 22:14 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 22:35 | yes | 18 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 22:20 | yes | 12 | 45 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 00:56 | no | 0 | 55 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 01:08 | yes | 16 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 00:04 | yes | 2 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 01:31 | yes | 21 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 23:48 | yes | 18 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 23:40 | yes | 21 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 23:44 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 01:14 | yes | 21 | 34 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 01:37 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 01:53 | no | 0 | 34 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 01:42 | yes | 23 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 01:43 | yes | 17 | 81 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 00:55 | yes | 5 | 12 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Everbridge read as Everbridge 360
Everbridge (BC in the Cloud) read as Everbridge 360
MetricStream read as MetricStream Business Continuity Management
Riskonnect read as Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience
Riskonnect (includes Castellan) read as Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience
Riskonnect (via Castellan acquisition) read as Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience
Riskonnect Business Continuity read as Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience
ServiceNow read as ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
ServiceNow (Incident & Crisis Management) read as ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
Unresolved, counted raw
AWS Business Continuity
Arcserve Continuous Availability
C-BCM
Castell InterRisk
Castellan Solutions
ContinueOps
Continuity Software
ContinuityOne
Crises Control
Datto Continuity
GlobalSuite – likely GRC Suite Continuity
ISO 22301 Templates & Documentation Tools
LogicManager BCM
Microsoft Azure Business Continuity
Microsoft Business Contact Manager (BCM)
Onspring Business Continuity
Open Resilience
ParaSolutio n Premier Continuum
ParaSolution Premier Continuum
Parasoft/ParaSolution (Premier Continuum)
Pirani
RS Archer (RSA Archer / Archer Business Resiliency)
SAI Global Assurance
SAP Business Continuity
SourceForge free BCM software
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.