| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business continuity management | Security operations | 9% | 3 of 114 | 10% | 20 | accepted challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“The absolute best pick if you want an end-to-end BCM platform that ensures your B2B enterprise clients that your resilience plans are fully standardized and certified.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Business continuity · direct prompt · first choice
“Some of the top-rated platforms include ParaSolution (Premier Continuum), which is suitable for mid-market organizations and offers a user-friendly interface” Llama 4 Maverick · Business continuity · budget prompt · first choice
“a usability-focused, ISO 22301-aligned platform like ParaSolution, Preparis or Mitratech for mid-market firms” Muse Glimmer 30B · Business continuity · comparative prompt · first choice
“I'd suggest starting with ParaSolution or LogicManager as they both offer strong mid-market focus” MiniMax M2.5 · Business continuity · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Usability leader, good for structured plans | Smaller integration ecosystem” Kimi K2 · Business continuity · scale prompt · soft negative
“reviewers note autonomy and onboarding limits” Muse Glimmer 30B · Business continuity · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 34 of the 34 answers that named ParaSolution and are not a share of its labels.
No domain is on file for ParaSolution, so its own site is not marked.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ParaSolution's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ParaSolution, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ParaSolution by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
ParaSolution is among the products AI models recommend first in Business continuity management this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.