1 category · RankedRiskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business continuity management | Security operations | 4% | 7 of 114 | 25% | 28 | criticized challenger |
Movement
By model
How each model treated Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best-in-class BCM and resilience platform with strong integrations with broader GRC functionality” MiniMax M2.5 · Business continuity · comparative prompt · first choice
“choose Riskonnect if you want a deeper, more scalable BCM program” GPT-5.4 mini · Business continuity · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Best overall for a mid-market B2B company: Riskonnect.” GPT-5.4 mini · Business continuity · direct prompt · first choice
“Those platforms are positioned for more complex, connected programs, so I'd check whether the added scope is worth the implementation and administration effort” GPT-6 Luna · Business continuity · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Legacy GRC Suites (e.g., Riskonnect, Archer, MetricStream) - These platforms are often criticized for being overly complex, difficult to implement, and not user-friendly.” Mistral Small · Business continuity · negative prompt · soft negative
“investing in high-end, enterprise-level GRC ... systems like Riskonnect, Archer, or Fusion Framework is often out of the question” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Business continuity · budget prompt · soft negative
“their pricing and implementation complexity are typically geared toward larger enterprises (typically 1,000+ employees)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Business continuity · scale prompt · soft negative
“without the heavy pricing of giants like ServiceNow or Riskonnect (custom quotes often $90K+ annually)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Business continuity · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, over the 90 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 89 of the 90 answers that named Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
361 of the 397 domain citations in answers naming Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
riskonnect.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience takes 4% of first choices and LogicManager takes 24%.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- not counted (“riskonnect business continuity & resilience”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 55,995 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 5,891 · 917 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 3,564
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 5 clicks and $0 a month (estimate)
In answers
This edition- First choices
- 8 across its categories
- Named in
- 90 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 89 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHide| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News or press | 494 | 6 | 2026-08-27 | GRC | |
| Blog | 351 | 0 | 2026-03-18 | GRC, TPRM | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 140 | 0 | 2026-01-07 | GRC, TPRM | |
| Case study | 120 | 0 | 2026-06-11 | GRC | |
| Conference or event | 66 | 5 | 2026-11-23 | GRC | |
| Glossary or explainer | 41 | 0 | 2024-09-03 | TPRM | |
| Report or ebook | 39 | 0 | 2026-05-04 | GRC | |
| Comparison | 28 | 3 | 2026-09-18 | GRC | |
| Template or tool | 28 | 0 | 2026-04-23 | ||
| Podcast or video | 11 | 0 | 2026-01-20 |
Most recent
- 2026-11-23Ifaci 2026 conference or event
- 2026-11-19Future of risk tech the 2027 vision conference or event
- 2026-10-22A roadmap for retention keeping people and resources aligned and engaged conference or event
- 2026-10-22A roadmap for retention keeping people and resources aligned and engaged 2 conference or event
- 2026-09-28List conference or event
- 2026-09-18Riskonnect vs logicgate grc comparison comparison
Events in person
- November 19, 2026 to November 20, 2026RIMS ERM ConferenceColumbus, Ohio, Columbus, United States · attends
- September 8, 2026 to September 9, 2026NSW Major Projects Conference 2026ICC, Sydney, Sydney, Australia
As the event pages on riskonnect.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page riskonnect.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name GRC (63); 0 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience
Follow Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience is its own company.ShowHide
The company
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Riskonnect's business continuity software helps you prepare for threats and minimize disruption to operations
- For
- Risk, claims, and safety professionals
- Customers named
- IHG Hotels & ResortsThe Wendy’s CompanyBTTransport for LondonU.S. Army PEO MSReimagined ParkingRandstad
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: riskonnect.com, riskonnect.com/compliance/ccpa, riskonnect.com/solutions, riskonnect.com/portfolio_category/case-studies, riskonnect.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.