AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Riskonnect BCM · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Riskonnect BCM

7Judge labels
0First choices
3Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Riskonnect BCM was named 4 times in Business continuity, where LogicManager led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In business continuity · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Riskonnect BCM for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Business continuity managementSecurity operations0%24 of 1140%4under 10 labels · led by LogicManager at 24%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Riskonnect BCM yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Riskonnect BCM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast10001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.501001
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative1 label1not counted in share
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Enterprises prioritize depth/integrations (Riskonnect/Fusion)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Business continuity · comparative prompt · first choice
“For a broad GRC + BCM suite with full BIA/BCP/DR workflow and ISO 22301 evidence packs: Riskonnect BCM.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Business continuity · direct prompt · alternative
“Unified GRC + BCM platform with integrated crisis communications” Kimi K2 · Business continuity · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Riskonnect BCM (Best for Integration)” MiniMax M2.5 · Business continuity · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Riskonnect BCM, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Riskonnect BCM was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
LogicManager3 of 72Not among the top eight
Fusion Risk Management3 of 70Not among the top eight
Noggin3 of 70Not among the top eight
ServiceNow BCM3 of 70Not among the top eight
Archer Resilience Management2 of 71Not among the top eight
ParaSolution2 of 71Not among the top eight
Quantivate2 of 71Not among the top eight
MetricStream Business Continuity Management2 of 70Not among the top eight
SureCloud2 of 70Not among the top eight
ServiceNow Business Continuity Management1 of 71Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Riskonnect BCM. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 7 answers that named Riskonnect BCM and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

riskpublishing.com7
clickup.com5
fortiv.io5
sprinto.com5
surecloud.com5
worldmetrics.org4
em360tech.com3
g2.com3
guideflow.com3
learn.g2.com3

Forty-three of the forty-three domain citations in answers naming Riskonnect BCM came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

riskonnect.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Riskonnect BCM takes 0% of first choices and LogicManager takes 24%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “business continuity management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “business continuity management platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Organic visits to its site
about 55,995 a month
Searches its site ranks for
5,891 · 917 in the top three
Sites linking to it
3,564
Paid Google search
1 searches its ads show for, about 5 clicks and $0 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
72 ads · 58 text, 14 image · 41 shown in the last 30 days

First shown February 2023, as Riskonnect, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 34 in the year, 38 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 24 of 114 in business continuity
Segment leader
24%
LogicManager
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
7 answers
Its own site cited
in 7 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on riskonnect.com
10,853
subdomains included
Content
1,318
counted in the table below
Documentation
5
Product · Integration
17 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
News or press49462026-08-27GRC
Blog35102026-03-18GRC, TPRM
Webinar or virtual event14002026-01-07GRC, TPRM
Case study12002026-06-11GRC
Conference or event6652026-11-23GRC
Glossary or explainer4102024-09-03TPRM
Report or ebook3902026-05-04GRC
Comparison2832026-09-18GRC
Template or tool2802026-04-23
Podcast or video1102026-01-20

Most recent

Events in person

Upcoming
  • November 19, 2026 to November 20, 2026RIMS ERM ConferenceColumbus, Ohio, Columbus, United States · attends
Last twelve months

As the event pages on riskonnect.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page riskonnect.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name GRC (63); 0 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Riskonnect BCM

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Riskonnect BCM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Riskonnect BCM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Riskonnect BCM by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Riskonnect BCM is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Riskonnect BCM, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at riskonnect.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.