Business continuity management for small business buyers
Asked as “business continuity management platform”, and as “business continuity planning software”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 52 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each. Added to the September 2026 Edition; its answers are read by the distilled judge (ai-indexes-judge-qwen3-14b-run3), not the claude-opus-5 judge of the earlier categories: how the two compare.
Standing · first-choice share
46%
Clear leader
46SafetyCulture10Sprinto08Preparis37others
46% of first choices, clear leader.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05B06
07
08
09F10
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01SafetyCulture46%
SafetyCulture46%02Sprinto10%
Sprinto10%03Preparis8%
Preparis8%04BCMMetrics4%
BCMMetrics4%05Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience2%
Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience2%06BC in the Cloud0%
07Everbridge 3600%
Everbridge 3600%08MetricStream Business Continuity Management0%
MetricStream Business Continuity Management0%09Archer0%
Archer0%10Fusion Risk Management0%
What they warned about
Four of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash and Kimi K2 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Fusion Risk Management
91%
20 of 22 labels negative · 11 of 12 models · 10 hard negative
“Enterprise tools like Fusion Risk Management or Archer often cost $75K+ annually and require dedicated administrators, which simply doesn't make sense for 30 people.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, scale prompt
Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience67%
12 of 18 labels negative · 9 of 12 models · 6 hard negative
“Avoid trying to implement specialized Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) platforms like **Riskonnect**” Qwen 3.7 Flash, budget prompt
MetricStream Business Continuity Management90%
9 of 10 labels negative · 8 of 12 models · 6 hard negative
“Platforms to Avoid for Tight Budgets: MetricStream can be overcomplicated and expensive for small teams” Claude Haiku 4.5, budget prompt
ServiceNow BCM100%
9 of 9 labels negative · 8 of 12 models · 3 hard negative
“avoid unless you already run most operations in ServiceNow” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the twelve in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
79 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1011 links across 149 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.
vendor site · G257 answers · 58 citations · 13 models
vendor site · ZipDo.co49 answers · 73 citations · 11 models
vendor site · G248 answers · 92 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Fortiv39 answers · 45 citations · 13 models
37 answers · 37 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Sprinto37 answers · 37 citations · 11 models
vendor site · FitGap31 answers · 38 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Riskonnect26 answers · 27 citations · 12 models
24 answers · 24 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Mitratech21 answers · 24 citations · 11 models
20 answers · 20 citations · 10 models
19 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
57 answers · 13 models
46 answers · 10 models
41 answers · 12 models
37 answers · 9 models
37 answers · 11 models
34 answers · 12 models
26 answers · 9 models
23 answers · 11 models
22 answers · 11 models
19 answers · 11 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best business continuity management platform”, “business continuity management platform”, “business continuity management platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SafetyCulture safetyculture.com | 46% | 73 | 18,100 | 132 | 466,981 | 1 | |
| Sprinto sprinto.com | 10% | 234 | 2,400 | 79 | 26,896 | 43 | |
| Preparis preparis.com | 8% | 45 | 390 | 13 | 351 | $28 | 9 |
| BCMMetrics bcmmetrics.com | 4% | 18 | 0 | 938 | |||
| Aptien aptien.com | 4% | 10 | 260 | 1 | 116,286 | 1 | |
| Vanta vanta.com | 4% | 500 | 40,500 | 1,219 | 72,260 | 120 | |
| Google Workspace google.com | 2% | 59 | 368,000 | 7,422 | 1,800,358,416 | $465,944 | 5 |
| LogicManager logicmanager.com | 2% | 43 | 320 | 9 | 8,388 | ||
| Microsoft parent site Microsoft 365 2% | 2% | 87 | 2,240,000 | 403,136 | |||
| Quantivate quantivate.com | 2% | 32 | 260 | 6 | 1,533 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 24 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (g2.com, softwarereviews.com). The first result for “best business continuity management platform” is myhospitalnow.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best business continuity management platform for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which business continuity planning software would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top business continuity management platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best business continuity management platform for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a business continuity management platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which business continuity management platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceAptienChangedagainst: Fusion Risk Management, SAI360PreparisLogicManager, Quantivateagainst: Fusion Risk Management, MetricStream Business Continuity Managementno first choiceagainst: Everbridge 360, Fusion Risk Management, MetricStream Business Continuity Management, Origami Risk, ServiceNow BCM, VMware Site Recovery Manager
Three alternatives
LogicManager, Quantivate Business Continuity, SafetyCultureFour alternatives
BC in the Cloud, Continuity2, Datto, FortivOne alternative
PreparisGPT-5.4 miniSprintoagainst: Fusion, IBM OpenPages, Riskonnect Business Continuity & ResiliencePreparisChangedagainst: Everbridge 360, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementSprintoagainst: Riskonnect Business Continuity & ResilienceSafetyCultureagainst: Continuity2no first choiceagainst: Datto BCDR, Datto SIRIS, Everbridge 360, Fusion Enterprise Resilience Platform, ParaSolution, SureCloud
Two alternatives
BC in the Cloud, CoplaThree alternatives
BC in the Cloud, Fusion Framework, NogginFour alternatives
Fusion Enterprise Resilience Platform, Fusion Framework, Ncontracts, SafetyCultureOne alternative
BC in the CloudGemini 3.5 FlashSprintoagainst: Archer, Fusion Risk Management, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementDrata, VantaChangedSafetyCultureagainst: Archer, Fusion Framework, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementKingsBridge SHIELDagainst: Archer, Fusion Risk Management, Riskonnect Business Continuity & ResilienceSecureframe, Sprinto, Vantaagainst: Archer, Fusion Risk Management, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilienceagainst: Archer, Datto, Fusion Risk Management, MetricStream Business Continuity Management, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, SAI360, ServiceNow BCM, Veeam
Five alternatives
BCMMetrics, Drata, Mitti, SmartSuite, VantaThree alternatives
Mitti, Preparis, SprintoThree alternatives
Continuity2, Preparis, SprintoThree alternatives
Mitti, Notion, OFB-EZEight alternatives
ComplyJet, Confluence, Google Drive, Mitti, Notion, Preparis, SimpleTexting, TwilioPerplexity SonarSafetyCultureSafetyCultureHeldagainst: Continuity LogicSafetyCultureSafetyCultureagainst: BC in the Cloud, Quantivate BCMno first choiceagainst: Archer Resilience Management / Archer Business Resiliency, Drata, Fusion Risk Management, MetricStream Business Continuity Management, Ncontracts, Quantivate BCM, Riskonnect BCM, ServiceNow BCM, Vanta
Three alternatives
Preparis, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, SprintoTwo alternatives
SimpleBackups, SprintoFour alternatives
Mitratech Preparis, Quantivate, RecoveryPlanner/RPX, SprintoOne alternative
SprintoGrok 4.1 FastSafetyCultureagainst: Fusion Risk Management, Riskonnect Business Continuity & ResilienceSafetyCultureHeldSafetyCultureagainst: Fusion, IBM OpenPagesSafetyCultureagainst: Continuity2, Jira, Quantivateno first choiceagainst: Archer Business Resiliency, Everbridge 360, Fusion Risk Management, IBM OpenPages
Two alternatives
BCMetrics, PreparisOne alternative
PreparisFour alternatives
BC in the Cloud, BCMetrics, MeridianBCMS, QuantivateOne alternative
Regroup Mass NotificationMistral SmallSprintoSafetyCultureChangedBC in the Cloud, SafetyCultureagainst: Fusion Risk ManagementSafetyCultureno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Ideagen Risk Management, MeridianBCMSTwo alternatives
BC in the Cloud, Quantivate Business Continuity ManagementFour alternatives
AlertMedia, Continuity Logic, Datto, SAI360DeepSeek V4 FlashSafetyCultureagainst: Archer, ServiceNow BCMPreparisChangedBC in the Cloud, SafetyCultureagainst: Everbridge 360SafetyCulturePreparisagainst: Archer, Fusion Risk Managementagainst: Archer, Fusion Risk Management, MetricStream Business Continuity Management, Noggin, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, Veoci
Three alternatives
BC in the Cloud, Preparis, SprintoThree alternatives
BC in the Cloud, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, SafetyCultureThree alternatives
BCMMetrics, Copla, SprintoThree alternatives
BC in the Cloud, BCMMetrics, PreparisFive alternatives
Aptien, Corexta, ParaSolution, SafetyCulture, VeociLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceQuantivate Business Continuity ManagementChangedSafetyCultureno first choiceno first choiceagainst: MetricStream Business Continuity Management
One alternative
BC in the CloudOne alternative
Fortiv.ioQwen 3.7 FlashSafetyCultureSprintoChangedagainst: IBM QRadar SOAR, SpheraSafetyCultureSafetyCultureagainst: Archer, Fusion Risk Management, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementBCDM, ResilienceONE, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, Suvodaagainst: Archer, Diligent One, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Managementagainst: IBM OpenPages, MetricStream Business Continuity Management, Oracle Risk Management Cloud, SAP GRC, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
Three alternatives
BCMMetrics, Drata, VantaThree alternatives
BC in the Cloud, Preparis, QuantivateOne alternative
BC in the CloudTwo alternatives
Corexta, Google WorkspaceKimi K2SafetyCulturePreparisChangedSafetyCultureagainst: Fusion Risk Management, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, ServiceNow BCMSafetyCultureagainst: BC in the Cloud, Everbridge 360SafetyCultureagainst: Archer, Fusion Risk Managementagainst: Everbridge 360, Fusion Enterprise Resilience Platform, Fusion Framework System, IBM OpenPages
Four alternatives
Aptien, ParaSolution, Preparis, SprintoThree alternatives
AlertMedia, Continuity Logic, SafetyCultureFour alternatives
BC in the Cloud, ClearView, Noggin, PreparisTwo alternatives
BCMMetrics, PreparisThree alternatives
Corexta, Preparis, SprintoGLM 4.7 FlashXSafetyCultureagainst: QuantivateSafetyCultureHeldagainst: ServiceNow BCMSafetyCultureSafetyCultureAptienagainst: Archer Business Resiliency, Everbridge 360, Fusion Risk Management, IBM OpenPages, MetricStream Business Continuity Management, Ncontracts, Noggin, Oracle Risk Management Cloud
One alternative
PreparisFour alternatives
Everbridge Business Continuity, LogicManager, Noggin, PreparisTwo alternatives
Everbridge 360, LogicManagerTwo alternatives
BCM Starter Kit, ClickUpFour alternatives
BC in the Cloud, BCMMetrics, Copla, SafetyCultureMiniMax M2.5SafetyCultureagainst: Quantivate Business Continuity Management, ServiceNow BCMSafetyCultureHeldSafetyCultureagainst: LogicManagerSafetyCultureno first choiceagainst: Archer Business Continuity Management, Fusion Risk Management, MetricStream Business Continuity Management, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, ServiceNow BCM
Two alternatives
Sprinto, VantaTwo alternatives
Copla, SprintoTwo alternatives
Preparis, VeociThree alternatives
Aptien, Copla, PreparisBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 00:53 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 01:49 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 00:22 | yes | 13 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 01:42 | yes | 18 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 00:31 | yes | 19 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 23:58 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 01:22 | yes | 21 | 65 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 01:04 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 01:09 | yes | 9 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 01:54 | yes | 15 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 00:38 | yes | 22 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 01:56 | yes | 11 | 49 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 22:37 | yes | 15 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 00:29 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 01:05 | yes | 10 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 00:06 | yes | 18 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 01:29 | yes | 21 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 01:05 | yes | 9 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 00:08 | yes | 21 | 47 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 00:04 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 23:49 | yes | 7 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 23:21 | yes | 9 | 31 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 23:50 | yes | 19 | 43 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 23:42 | yes | 11 | 21 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 00:40 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 22:09 | yes | 3 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 22:36 | yes | 12 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 01:27 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 01:31 | yes | 18 | 14 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 23:50 | yes | 11 | 13 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 00:06 | yes | 20 | 56 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 00:42 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 22:41 | yes | 19 | 65 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 01:00 | yes | 14 | 20 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 22:38 | yes | 20 | 83 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 00:52 | yes | 19 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 23:57 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 23:14 | yes | 4 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 00:47 | yes | 15 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 23:59 | yes | 20 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 01:07 | yes | 21 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 23:17 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 23:22 | yes | 19 | 57 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 22:48 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 23:02 | yes | 8 | 41 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 01:28 | yes | 15 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 23:59 | yes | 23 | 39 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 01:11 | yes | 13 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 23:59 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 23:55 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 00:27 | yes | 9 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 01:10 | yes | 19 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 00:53 | yes | 17 | 47 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 01:47 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 22:20 | yes | 18 | 43 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 23:03 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 22:24 | no | 0 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 22:43 | yes | 21 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 01:34 | yes | 12 | 51 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 01:06 | yes | 5 | 15 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 00:18 | yes | 17 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 23:04 | yes | 6 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 01:11 | yes | 18 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 01:20 | yes | 18 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 23:53 | yes | 21 | 12 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 00:05 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 00:46 | yes | 24 | 53 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 01:10 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 01:20 | yes | 5 | 34 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 23:32 | yes | 22 | 36 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 00:04 | yes | 17 | 101 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 01:49 | yes | 18 | 38 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Everbridge read as Everbridge 360
MetricStream read as MetricStream Business Continuity Management
RiskOnnect read as Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience
Riskonnect read as Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience
Riskonnect Business Continuity read as Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience
ServiceNow read as ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
Unresolved, counted raw
Ampersand
BCDM
BCM Starter Kit
BCP Builder
ClearView
Continuous Logic / Continuity Logic
Everbridge Business Continuity
Fortiv.io
IBHS’s free OFB-EZ toolkit
IBM Resilience Manager
Ideagen Risk Management
Kaspersky Incident Management
Kingsbridge BCP
Mitigance
OFB-EZ (Open for Business-EZ)
Preparis Planner
Preparis RecoveryPlanner
Ready.gov Business Continuity Plan Template
RecoveryPlanner/RPX
Regroup Mass Notification
ResilienceONE
SafetyCulture – Bowtie / iAuditor continuity
SafetyCulture's Mitti
SimpleBackups
Sphera
Suvoda
Tandem
VMware Site Recovery Manager
Word and Excel
Zmanda
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.