| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business continuity management | Security operations | 6% | 6 of 114 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by LogicManager at 24% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If your team does not have a dedicated, certified business continuity manager on staff ... Preparis (owned by Mitratech) is an industry favorite.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Business continuity · direct prompt · first choice
“My default recommendation: Mitratech Preparis for a mid-sized B2B company” GPT-6 Luna · Business continuity · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Start with Mitratech Preparis if you want simplicity and speed” GPT-5.4 mini · Business continuity · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Preparis or Noggin if guided planning or broader resilience workflows are priorities” GPT-6 Luna · Business continuity · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 7 answers that named Mitratech Preparis and are not a share of its labels.
Thirty-five of the forty domain citations in answers naming Mitratech Preparis came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Mitratech Preparis's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: mitratech.com/products/preparis, mitratech.com/products/grc-platform, mitratech.com/solutions/risk-compliance, mitratech.com/solutions/risk-compliance/incident-management, mitratech.com/solutions/risk-compliance/emergency-notifications. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Mitratech Preparis's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Mitratech Preparis, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Mitratech Preparis by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: