IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › LogicManager · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

LogicManager

11Judge labels

2First choices

0Negative labels

7 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

8 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. LogicManager was named 8 times in GRC and 1 other category, where Vanta led with 14%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market14 of 77

under the label threshold

Enterprise12 of 47

under the label threshold

In grc · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named LogicManager for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
GRC platforms	Security operations	2%	14 of 77	0%	7	under 10 labels · led by Vanta at 14%
Compliance automation	Security operations	0%	38 of 54	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Drata at 37%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for LogicManager yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated LogicManager across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	2	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1	2
Kimi K2	1	1	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labels1

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labels1

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“LogicManager – Best Overall for Mid-Market” Kimi K2 · GRC · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Best for: Organizations prioritizing risk management methodology... Consideration: May have steeper learning curve” Kimi K2 · GRC · direct prompt · alternative

“Tier 2: Enterprise GRC with Mid-Market Reach ... AuditBoard, OneTrust, LogicManager, Diligent” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Compliance automation · scale prompt · alternative

“LogicManager is another good fit for mid-market organizations.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · GRC · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as LogicManager, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LogicManager was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Secureframe7 of 111Not in the top three

Vanta6 of 112Not in the top three

ZenGRC6 of 111Not in the top three

Archer6 of 110Not in the top three

OneTrust6 of 110Not in the top three

ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management6 of 110Not in the top three

Drata5 of 111Not in the top three

Sprinto5 of 111Not in the top three

MetricStream5 of 110Not in the top three

Hyperproof4 of 112Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named LogicManager. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 11 answers that named LogicManager and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

comchart.com5

initiarisk.com5

riskwatch.com5

saltycloud.com5

bdemerson.com4

riskonnect.com4

enzuzo.com2

expertinsights.com2

learn.g2.com2

metricstream.com2

Thirty-six of the thirty-six domain citations in answers naming LogicManager came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

comchart.com/grc-software-mid-market5

initiarisk.com/resources/best-grc-software-for-mid-market-companies-20265

riskwatch.com/grc-software5

saltycloud.com/blog/mid-market-grc-tools-and-solutions5

bdemerson.com/article/the-best-grc-software-a-practical-evaluation4

riskonnect.com/best-grc-software-platforms-20264

enzuzo.com/blog/best-grc-software2

expertinsights.com/compliance/the-top-governance-risk-compliance-grc-platforms2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when LogicManager's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as LogicManager, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at logicmanager.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.