AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Mitratech Continuity Planning · October 2026 Edition
Mitratech · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Mitratech Continuity Planning

5Judge labels
2First choices
1Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Mitratech Continuity Planning was named 3 times in Business continuity, where LogicManager led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In business continuity · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Mitratech Continuity Planning for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Business continuity managementSecurity operations2%13 of 1140%3under 10 labels · led by LogicManager at 24%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Mitratech Continuity Planning yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Mitratech Continuity Planning across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.511103
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase2 labels2
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“This is best for mid-to-enterprise organizations needing an all-in-one BCM platform” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Business continuity · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Mitratech is best for mid-to-enterprise organizations needing an all-in-one BCM platform” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Business continuity · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Mitratech Continuity Planning, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mitratech Continuity Planning was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Everbridge 3603 of 50Not among the top eight
Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience3 of 50Not among the top eight
Sprinto2 of 51Not among the top eight
Continuity22 of 50Not among the top eight
Fusion Risk Management2 of 50Not among the top eight
MetricStream Business Continuity Management2 of 50Not among the top eight
Quantivate2 of 50Not among the top eight
Archer1 of 50Not among the top eight
Archer Business Resilience1 of 50Not among the top eight
BC in the Cloud1 of 50Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Mitratech Continuity Planning. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 5 answers that named Mitratech Continuity Planning and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

mitratech.comYour site5
sprinto.com5
fortiv.io4
zipdo.co4
expertinsights.com3
riskonnect.com3
softwaretestinghelp.com3
em360tech.com2
g2.com2
gartner.com2

Twenty-eight of the thirty-three domain citations in answers naming Mitratech Continuity Planning came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

mitratech.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Mitratech Continuity Planning takes 2% of first choices and LogicManager takes 24%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “business continuity management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “business continuity management platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Its company's site
mitratech.com shared with Mitratech's other products; the figures are the site's
Organic visits to its site
about 46,305 a month
Searches its site ranks for
11,621 · 614 in the top three
Sites linking to it
5,254
Paid Google search
14 searches its ads show for, about 177 clicks and $10,768 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
108+ ads · 94 text, 7 image, 7 video · 106 shown in the last 30 days

First shown March 2022, as Mitratech Holdings, Inc, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 69 in the year, 39 before. 12 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 13 of 114 in business continuity
Segment leader
24%
LogicManager
First choices
2 across its categories
Named in
5 answers
Its own site cited
in 5 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Mitratech Continuity Planning

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Mitratech Continuity Planning; a claim can dispute any of them.
Mitratech Continuity Planning (Preparis) 1

Follow Mitratech Continuity Planning

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Mitratech is the company behind Mitratech Continuity Planning.
ShowHide

On record

Company records
Also from Mitratech
Mitratech Preparis

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
A RegTech solution that automates risk, compliance, vendor and performance management for the financial services industry. It integrates the mandated processes of risk and compliance to boost performance.
For
the financial services industry
Certifications
ISO 22301GDPRHIPAA
Customers named
NeodigitalShawbrook BankHMSHostCapitol BankMajor U.S. Bankan $18 billion bank based in New York CityFarm Bureau Insurance Organization
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What Mitratech Continuity Planning's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: success.mitratech.com/Continuity, mitratech.com/products/continuity, mitratech.com/resource-hub/case-studies/us-bank-continuity-planning, mitratech.com/solutions/risk-compliance/business-continuity-planning, mitratech.com/solutions/human-resources/business-continuity-planning. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Mitratech Continuity Planning's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Mitratech Continuity Planning, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Mitratech Continuity Planning by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Mitratech Continuity Planning is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Mitratech Continuity Planning, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at mitratech.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.