Every category where a model named BC in the Cloud for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Business continuity management	Security operations	0%	21 of 114	12%	17	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for BC in the Cloud yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated BC in the Cloud across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	2	0	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	1	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	0	0	2
Mistral Small	0	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	2	0	1	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct8 labelsNone

Paraphrase14 labelsNone

Comparative9 labels3not counted in share

Budget-constrained7 labelsNone

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative45 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Everbridge if you want BCM tightly connected to alerts and incident response.” GPT-5.4 mini · Business continuity · comparative prompt · first choice

“platforms like Fusion Framework System, BC in the Cloud, and ParaSolution, which offer simple setup, affordable plans” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Business continuity · budget prompt · alternative

“Highly configurable but scaled down enough for mid-market teams, offering great support during onboarding.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Business continuity · scale prompt · alternative

“worth considering if your priority is usability and faster adoption for a medium-sized organization” Perplexity Sonar · Business continuity · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Caution flags: Multiple user-reported issues including complex initial setup, integration problems, limited functionality for alert tracking, and configuration challenges” Kimi K2 · Business continuity · negative prompt · soft negative

“much cheaper than enterprise-oriented options like BC in the Cloud” GPT-5.4 mini · Business continuity · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as BC in the Cloud, over the 45 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and BC in the Cloud was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

SafetyCulture27 of 4513Not among the top eight

Preparis13 of 454Not among the top eight

Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience12 of 452Not among the top eight

Fusion Risk Management11 of 452Not among the top eight

Everbridge 36011 of 450Not among the top eight

Sprinto10 of 454Not among the top eight

Quantivate10 of 452Not among the top eight

LogicManager9 of 454Not among the top eight

ParaSolution8 of 452Not among the top eight

Copla8 of 450Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named BC in the Cloud. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 45 of the 45 answers that named BC in the Cloud and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

learn.g2.com40

g2.com31

zipdo.co26

riskpublishing.com22

sprinto.com21

fortiv.io20

mitratech.com18

guideflow.com17

softwaretestinghelp.com17

us.fitgap.com16

No domain is on file for BC in the Cloud, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

learn.g2.com/best-business-continuity-management-software40

g2.com/categories/business-continuity-management-software26

riskpublishing.com/best-business-continuity-management-software-compared22

sprinto.com/blog/business-continuity-management-software21

zipdo.co/best/business-continuity-plan-software20

fortiv.io/blog/best-business-continuity-software18

softwaretestinghelp.com/best-business-continuity-software-solutions17

guideflow.com/blog/business-continuity-software16

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where BC in the Cloud stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 110 a month (“bc in the cloud”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 3 a month
Its own site: No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 21 of 114 in business continuity

Segment leader

24%

LogicManager

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 45 answers
Its own site cited: No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as BC in the Cloud

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as BC in the Cloud; a claim can dispute any of them.

BC in the Cloud (Continuity2/BCMS2) 1BC in the Cloud (Infinite Blue) 1Everbridge 360 / BC in the Cloud 1Everbridge 360 AI Prepare / BC in the Cloud 1SafetyCulture/BC in the Cloud 1

Follow BC in the Cloud

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when BC in the Cloud's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as BC in the Cloud, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for BC in the Cloud by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where BC in the Cloud is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name BC in the Cloud, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.