AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Everbridge 360 · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Everbridge 360

57Judge labels
0First choices
24Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Business continuity for mid-market buyers
Rank 86 of 114 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 41% of its 17 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Everbridge 360 →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In business continuity · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Everbridge 360 for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Business continuity managementSecurity operations0%86 of 11441%17criticized challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Everbridge 360 yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Everbridge 360 across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500112
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast03126
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00112
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K200011
GLM 4.7 FlashX00011
MiniMax M2.501102
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00011

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct8 labelsNone
Paraphrase9 labelsNone
Comparative11 labelsNone
Budget-constrained4 labelsNone
Scale-constrained7 labelsNone
Negative18 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative57 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“better if your top priority is critical event management and employee notifications during incidents” GPT-5.4 mini · Business continuity · direct prompt · alternative
“Everbridge (now part of OnSolve) is the gold standard for enterprise-grade notifications” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Business continuity · direct prompt · alternative
“Everbridge 360: Excels in crisis comms/alerting; good for distributed teams.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Business continuity · scale prompt · alternative
“Best for: Large enterprises requiring mass notification capabilities” MiniMax M2.5 · Business continuity · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“users frequently criticize its BCM capabilities... Why to avoid: Users report that the interface is clunky.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Business continuity · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid pricier ones like Sprinto ($10K+/year) or enterprise tools (e.g., Everbridge, Resolver)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Business continuity · budget prompt · hard negative
“Caution flags: Multiple user-reported issues including complex initial setup, integration problems, limited functionality for alert tracking, and configuration challenges” Kimi K2 · Business continuity · negative prompt · soft negative
“The breadth and complexity can overwhelm teams that only need core BCM, and premium pricing and add-ons push total cost higher” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Business continuity · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Everbridge 360, over the 57 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Everbridge 360 was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Fusion Risk Management25 of 5711Not among the top eight
Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience24 of 574Not among the top eight
MetricStream Business Continuity Management19 of 570Not among the top eight
IBM OpenPages15 of 570Not among the top eight
SafetyCulture14 of 577Not among the top eight
Sprinto13 of 573Not among the top eight
ServiceNow BCM13 of 572Not among the top eight
BC in the Cloud11 of 571Not among the top eight
Noggin11 of 570Not among the top eight
Archer10 of 570Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Everbridge 360. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 52 of the 57 answers that named Everbridge 360 and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

learn.g2.com36
sprinto.com34
fortiv.io33
riskpublishing.com33
g2.com32
em360tech.com29
mitratech.com23
surecloud.com22
expertinsights.com20
worldmetrics.org20

282 of the 282 domain citations in answers naming Everbridge 360 came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

everbridge.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Everbridge 360 takes 0% of first choices and LogicManager takes 24%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “business continuity management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “business continuity management platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
720 a month (“everbridge 360”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
15 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 62,347 a month
Searches its site ranks for
4,321 · 759 in the top three
Sites linking to it
5,450
Paid Google search
1 searches its ads show for, about 1 clicks and $0 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
52 ads · 48 text, 2 image, 2 video · 16 shown in the last 30 days

First shown August 2025, as Everbridge, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 19 in the year, 33 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 86 of 114 in business continuity
Segment leader
24%
LogicManager
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
57 answers
Its own site cited
in 52 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on everbridge.com
2,235
subdomains included
Content
943
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
61 · 3
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
News or press48042026-09-28
Blog31612026-09-04
Case study5902024-01-10
Conference or event2822026-09-21
Webinar or virtual event23undated
Template or tool1832026-08-25
Glossary or explainer802026-03-27
Report or ebook412026-07-09
Comparison402026-06-03
Podcast or video302024-12-02
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page everbridge.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Everbridge 360

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Everbridge 360; a claim can dispute any of them.
Everbridge 8Everbridge (BC in the Cloud) 1Everbridge 360 (Critical Event Management) 1Everbridge 360 / BC in the Cloud 1Everbridge 360 / Everbridge BC in the Cloud 1

Follow Everbridge 360

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Everbridge 360 is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
the only end-to-end platform that helps organizations know risk earlier, understand what matters most, and act faster, combining real-time risk intelligence, automation, and human judgment to coordinate response, accelerate recovery, and improve with every event
For
organizations
Price stated
Core (large teams) Professional (multiple teams) Enterprise (global enterprises) everbridge.com/pricing
Starting price
Starting under $9K everbridge.com/pricing
Certifications
C5CCPADORAEU-US DPFFedRAMP ModerateG-CloudGDPRHIPAA
Customers named
Burns & McDonnellDiebold NixdorfFairfax CountyRegeneronSony PlayStationMilliporeSigma
Not stated on the pages read
Free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What Everbridge 360's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: everbridge.com, everbridge.com/pricing, trust.everbridge.com, everbridge.com/products, everbridge.com/no/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Everbridge 360's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Everbridge 360, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Everbridge 360 by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Everbridge 360 is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Everbridge 360, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at everbridge.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.