| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business continuity management | Security operations | 7% | 4 of 114 | 4% | 23 | accepted challenger | |
| Cyber risk quantification | Security operations | 0% | 98 of 116 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by CyberSaint CyberStrong at 25% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Quantivate and BCMMetrics stand out as particularly cost-effective options for organizations working with limited budgets.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Business continuity · budget prompt · first choice
“I would recommend starting with LogicManager or Quantivate as they specifically target this segment” MiniMax M2.5 · Business continuity · direct prompt · first choice
“Choose Quantivate if you need the best all-around balance of scalability, structure, and BCM depth.” Perplexity Sonar · Business continuity · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“LogicManager or Quantivate are the most commonly recommended” Muse Glimmer 30B · Business continuity · direct prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“be cautious if you are not in a regulated financial-services-style environment” Perplexity Sonar · Business continuity · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 32 of the 32 answers that named Quantivate and are not a share of its labels.
164 of the 164 domain citations in answers naming Quantivate came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 299 | 0 | 2025-06-06 | GRC, TPRM | |
| News or press | 68 | undated | GRC, Business continuity | ||
| Report or ebook | 26 | undated | GRC | ||
| Template or tool | 6 | undated | GRC | ||
| Conference or event | 5 | 0 | 2014-12-16 | GRC | |
| Glossary or explainer | 4 | 0 | 2019-07-11 | GRC | |
| Case study | 3 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 2 | undated | GRC | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 1 | 0 | 2016-10-12 |
Every page quantivate.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name GRC (38); 1 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Quantivate's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: quantivate.com, quantivate.com/solution, quantivate.com/about/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Quantivate's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Quantivate, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Quantivate by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: