Every category where a model named Continuity2 for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Business continuity management	Security operations	2%	11 of 114	11%	19	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Continuity2 yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Continuity2 across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	2	1	0	3
GPT-5.4 mini	0	2	1	0	3
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	2	0	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	2	1	0	4
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	1	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labels1

Comparative8 labelsNone

Budget-constrained7 labelsNone

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative30 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Top Recommendation: Continuity2 ... stands out as the strongest, most pragmatic choice” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Business continuity · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“good if you want a more straightforward BCM tool focused on creating, storing, managing, and distributing continuity plans” GPT-5.4 mini · Business continuity · direct prompt · alternative

“Highly regarded for clean, straightforward implementation, especially if you are aligning with ISO 22301 standards.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Business continuity · scale prompt · alternative

“Starting at £22,500 per year, this platform is purpose-built for mid-market firms seeking ISO 22301 certification.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Business continuity · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Mixed sentiment on Capterra (4.3/5 from ~18 reviews), with some negative feedback on usability and support” Grok 4.1 Fast · Business continuity · negative prompt · soft negative

“Continuity2, which has a limited footprint outside BCM core.” Llama 4 Maverick · Business continuity · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Continuity2, over the 30 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Continuity2 was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience13 of 303Compare →

Fusion Risk Management12 of 302Not among the top eight

Noggin11 of 300Not among the top eight

Sprinto9 of 301Not among the top eight

Everbridge 3609 of 300Not among the top eight

ServiceNow BCM8 of 301Not among the top eight

Archer8 of 300Not among the top eight

SafetyCulture7 of 305Compare →

Preparis7 of 304Compare →

Quantivate7 of 302Compare →

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Continuity2. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 30 of the 30 answers that named Continuity2 and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

fortiv.io23

learn.g2.com17

riskpublishing.com14

em360tech.com13

sprinto.com13

riskonnect.com12

g2.com10

mitratech.com10

capterra.com9

advisori.de8

No domain is on file for Continuity2, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

fortiv.io/blog/best-business-continuity-software19

learn.g2.com/best-business-continuity-management-software17

riskpublishing.com/best-business-continuity-management-software-compared14

em360tech.com/top-10/business-continuity-platforms13

sprinto.com/blog/business-continuity-management-software13

riskonnect.com/best-business-continuity-software-compare-features-and-benefits12

mitratech.com/resource-hub/blog/top-bcm-software-solutions9

advisori.de/en/blog/business-continuity-software-comparison-bcm-platforms-20268

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Continuity2 stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 20 a month (“continuity2”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Its own site: No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 11 of 114 in business continuity

Segment leader

24%

LogicManager

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 30 answers
Its own site cited: No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Continuity2

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Continuity2; a claim can dispute any of them.

Continuity2 (BCMS2) 1Continuity2 (C2) 1Continuity2 (Meridian BCMS) 1

Follow Continuity2

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Continuity2's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Continuity2, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Continuity2 by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Continuity2 is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Continuity2, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.