Workflow orchestration
Asked as “workflow orchestration tool”, and as “data pipeline orchestrator”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 58 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
21%
Contested · Apache Airflow 17%
21Prefect17Apache Airflow14Dagster48others
21% of first choices, contested.
Since September 2026=heldSince September 2026: 24% → 24%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Prefect held the lead, ±0 points on 24%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Make24%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Make (23%) replaces Prefect (23% then, 21% now), 2 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →Mid-market
Prefect21%Contested=heldSince September 2026: 24% → 24%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageEnterprise
Apache Airflow26%Contested▼−1Since September 2026: 29% → 27%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →
Make24%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Make (23%) replaces Prefect (23% then, 21% now), 2 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketPrefect21%Contested=heldSince September 2026: 24% → 24%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageEnterpriseApache Airflow26%Contested▼−1Since September 2026: 29% → 27%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Prefect21%5%55accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 24% → 24%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.24% → 24%
Prefect21%5%55accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 24% → 24%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.24% → 24%02Apache Airflow17%31%65criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 16% → 14%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.16% → 14%
Apache Airflow17%31%65criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 16% → 14%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.16% → 14%03
Dagster14%8%50accepted challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 18% → 14%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.18% → 14%
Dagster14%8%50accepted challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 18% → 14%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.18% → 14%04
n8n14%14%28accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 8% → 12%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.8% → 12%
n8n14%14%28accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 8% → 12%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.8% → 12%05Make12%26%27criticized challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 10% → 14%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.10% → 14%
Make12%26%27criticized challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 10% → 14%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.10% → 14%06
Workato5%33%18criticized challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 2%
Workato5%33%18criticized challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 2%07
Kestra3%11%19accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 4%
Kestra3%11%19accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 4%08
Zapier3%50%32criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 4%
Zapier3%50%32criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 4%09
Temporal2%7%30accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Temporal2%7%30accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%10
Microsoft Power Automate2%12%16accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Microsoft Power Automate2%12%16accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
14
AWS Step Functions0%22%18accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
AWS Step Functions0%22%18accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%11
Argo Workflows0%14%22accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Argo Workflows0%14%22accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%12
Camunda0%11%19accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Camunda0%11%19accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%13
Astronomer Astro0%6%16accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Astronomer Astro0%6%16accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Prefect vs MakePrefect vs WorkatoPrefect vs KestraPrefect vs ZapierApache Airflow vs DagsterApache Airflow vs n8nApache Airflow vs MakeApache Airflow vs WorkatoApache Airflow vs KestraApache Airflow vs ZapierDagster vs n8nDagster vs MakeDagster vs WorkatoDagster vs KestraDagster vs Zapiern8n vs Maken8n vs Workaton8n vs Kestran8n vs ZapierMake vs WorkatoMake vs KestraMake vs ZapierWorkato vs KestraWorkato vs ZapierKestra vs Zapier
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
0102030405060708091011121314Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Prefect21%
Prefect21%02Apache Airflow17%
Apache Airflow17%03Dagster14%
Dagster14%04n8n14%
n8n14%05Make12%
Make12%06Workato5%
Workato5%07Kestra3%
Kestra3%08Zapier3%
Zapier3%09Temporal2%
Temporal2%10Microsoft Power Automate2%
Microsoft Power Automate2%11Argo Workflows0%
Argo Workflows0%12Camunda0%
Camunda0%13Astronomer Astro0%
Astronomer Astro0%14AWS Step Functions0%
AWS Step Functions0%What they warned about
Zero of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Apache Airflow31%
20 of 65 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“The Budget Trap: Why Apache Airflow is often a bad choice” Gemini 3.5 Flash, budget prompt
Zapier50%
16 of 32 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“If your budget is bleeding from expensive tools like Zapier or Make... self-hosting is your best friend.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, budget prompt
Make26%
7 of 27 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Avoid No-Code (Zapier/Make)** for data infrastructure, ETL, and backend logic.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
Workato33%
6 of 18 labels negative · 5 of 14 models
“Workato specifically gets complaints about overwhelming complexity/pricing, steep onboarding, data limits” Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
78 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1013 links across 264 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 7 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Kestra30 answers · 60 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Cognism23 answers · 27 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Teamwork.com22 answers · 22 citations · 10 models
vendor site · LarkSuite21 answers · 26 citations · 9 models
21 answers · 24 citations · 9 models
vendor site · ONES.com19 answers · 21 citations · 10 models
18 answers · 20 citations · 10 models
18 answers · 18 citations · 8 models
16 answers · 19 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Wrike16 answers · 17 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Zapier15 answers · 20 citations · 10 models
14 answers · 25 citations · 6 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
21 answers · 9 models
21 answers · 9 models
19 answers · 10 models
18 answers · 10 models
18 answers · 9 models
18 answers · 8 models
15 answers · 10 models
14 answers · 8 models
12 answers · 7 models
11 answers · 5 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best workflow orchestration tool”, “workflow orchestration tool”, “workflow orchestration tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prefect prefect.io | 21% | 142 | 14,800 | 1,159 | 8,198 | $691 | 6 |
| Apache Airflow apache.org | 17% | 220 | 8,100 | 271 | 1,144,025 | 0 | |
| Dagster dagster.io | 14% | 147 | 5,400 | 143 | 23,407 | 34 | |
| n8n n8n.io | 14% | 111 | 165,000 | 2,786 | 133,599 | 42 | |
| Make make.com | 12% | 104 | 135,000 | 12,939,045 | 439,031 | 76 | |
| Workato workato.com | 5% | 64 | 14,800 | 405 | 38,042 | $20 | 120 |
| Kestra kestra.io | 3% | 43 | 14,800 | 291 | 4,471 | 2 | |
| Zapier zapier.com | 3% | 151 | 165,000 | 2,145 | 7,333,309 | $230 | 120 |
| Temporal temporal.io | 2% | 92 | 49,500 | 13,896 | 41,181 | 70 | |
| Microsoft parent site Microsoft Power Automate 2% | 2% | 314 | 2,240,000 | 403,136 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 17 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (teamwork.com, thedigitalprojectmanager.com). The first result for “best workflow orchestration tool” is guptadeepak.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best workflow orchestration tool for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which data pipeline orchestrator would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top workflow orchestration tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best workflow orchestration tool for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a workflow orchestration tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which workflow orchestration tools should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Make, ZapierDagster, Hevo DataChangedagainst: Apache Airflowno first choiceApache Airflow, n8nno first choiceagainst: AWS Step Functions, Apache Airflow, Google Cloud Workflows, Microsoft Power Automate, Pega, ServiceNow, Zapier
Two alternatives
Prefect, n8nOne alternative
KestraSix alternatives
AWS Step Functions, Apache Airflow, Camunda, Google Cloud Workflows, Prefect, TemporalThree alternatives
Activepieces, Argo Workflows, CamundaGPT-5.4 miniPrefectDagsterChangedApache Airflowagainst: LuigiApache Airflowno first choiceagainst: Apache Airflow
Three alternatives
Apache Airflow, Dagster, TemporalTwo alternatives
Apache Airflow, PrefectFour alternatives
Argo Workflows, Dagster, Prefect, TemporalThree alternatives
Argo Workflows, Dagster, PrefectGemini 3.5 FlashMake, Prefectagainst: Apache Airflow, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, ZapierDagsterChangedagainst: Apache Airflowno first choicePrefect, n8nagainst: Apache Airflow, Make, ZapierDagster, Prefectagainst: Apache Airflow, Zapieragainst: Apache Airflow, Apache Oozie, ArcGIS Workflow Manager, Argo Workflows, Azkaban, Dagster, Kestra, Kubeflow, Luigi, Mage, Make, Prefect, Zapier
Four alternatives
Astronomer Astro, Dagster, Workato, n8nOne alternative
PrefectFive alternatives
AWS Step Functions, Activepieces, Dagster, Google Cloud Workflows, KestraSeven alternatives
Amazon Managed Workflows for Apache Airflow, Astronomer Astro, Make, Temporal, Tray.io, Workato, n8nPerplexity SonarWorkatoDagsterChangedApache AirflowMakeagainst: Zapierno first choiceagainst: Apache Airflow, Celery, Cron, Temporal
Five alternatives
HubSpot workflows, Make, SnapLogic, Zapier, n8nThree alternatives
Apache Airflow, Fivetran, KestraFour alternatives
Argo Workflows, Dagster, Kestra, PrefectOne alternative
KestraGrok 4.1 FastMake, Zapieragainst: WorkatoPrefectChangedagainst: DagsterApache AirflowApache AirflowPrefectagainst: Zapier, n8nagainst: ActiveBatch, Apache Airflow, Argo Workflows, Dagster, Make, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, Prefect, Workato, Zapier
Five alternatives
Apache Airflow, Microsoft Power Automate, Prefect, Tray.io, n8nTwo alternatives
Apache Airflow, Astronomer AstroFour alternatives
Argo Workflows, Dagster, Flyte, PrefectThree alternatives
Dagster, Mage, PrefectSix alternatives
ActiveBatch, Apache Airflow, Astronomer Astro, BMC Control-M, Dagster, KestraMistral SmallHubSpot Marketing HubApache AirflowChangedApache AirflowApache Airflowno first choiceagainst: Make, Zapier
Four alternatives
Kissflow, Microsoft Power Automate, Revo, Tray.ioTwo alternatives
Dagster, PrefectFive alternatives
Argo Workflows, Dagster, Luigi, Prefect, TemporalThree alternatives
Lark, Zapier, n8nDeepSeek V4 Flashn8nagainst: Make, SnapLogic, WorkatoDagsterChangedApache Airflowagainst: Luigin8nagainst: Zapierno first choiceagainst: ActiveBatch, Apache Airflow, Luigi, Make, ServiceNow, Tidal, Zapier
Two alternatives
Microsoft Power Automate, ZapierTwo alternatives
Apache Airflow, PrefectFive alternatives
Argo Workflows, Dagster, Flyte, Prefect, TemporalTwo alternatives
Apache Airflow, MakeLlama 4 MaverickKissflowno first choiceChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
HubSpot Marketing Hub, Microsoft Power AutomateQwen 3.7 FlashMakeagainst: ZapierPrefectChangedApache Airflow, Dagster, Prefectn8nagainst: ZapierDagster, Prefectagainst: Apache Airflowagainst: ActiveBatch, Apache Airflow, Cron Jobs / Bash Scripts, Make, ServiceNow, Workato, Zapier
Four alternatives
Kissflow, Microsoft Power Automate, Native HubSpot Workflows, NintexFour alternatives
Amazon Managed Workflows for Apache Airflow, Apache Airflow, Dagster, Google Cloud ComposerFive alternatives
Activepieces, Apache Airflow, Make, Node-RED, PrefectTwo alternatives
Camunda, TemporalKimi K2Makeagainst: ZapierPrefectChangedApache AirflowKestra, n8nTemporalagainst: Apache Airflow, Workato, n8nagainst: AWS Step Functions, Apache Airflow, Argo Workflows, Azkaban, Azure Logic Apps, Camunda, Dagster, Flo, Google Cloud Composer, Google Cloud Workflows, Kestra, Luigi, Orchest, Prefect, Temporal
Three alternatives
Tray.io, Workato, n8nThree alternatives
Apache Airflow, Astronomer Astro, MageSix alternatives
Argo Workflows, Camunda, Dagster, Kestra, Prefect, TemporalThree alternatives
Activepieces, Apache Airflow, Argo WorkflowsTwo alternatives
Kestra, PrefectGLM 4.7 FlashXMakeagainst: Microsoft Power Automate, WorkatoApache AirflowChangedApache AirflowKestra, Prefectno first choiceagainst: AWS Step Functions, Apache Airflow, Appian, Zapier, n8nagainst: Apache Airflow, Camunda, Kubernetes
Two alternatives
Zapier, n8nFour alternatives
Astronomer Astro, Dagster, Kestra, PrefectEight alternatives
Apache NiFi, Camunda, Dagster, Inngest, Kestra, Prefect, Temporal, n8nFour alternatives
Apache Airflow, Dagster, Make, ZapierTwo alternatives
Camunda, WorkatoMiniMax M2.5Microsoft Power Automate, Tray.ioApache Airflow, PrefectChangedno first choicePrefectno first choiceagainst: Apache Airflow
One alternative
ZapierOne alternative
DagsterSix alternatives
AWS Step Functions, Apache Airflow, Argo Workflows, Camunda, Dagster, PrefectSix alternatives
Apache Airflow, Camunda, Dagster, Make, Microsoft Power Automate, ZapierGPT-6 LunaWorkatoDagsterChangedno first choiceApache Airflow, n8nno first choiceagainst: AWS Step Functions, Apache Airflow, n8n
Four alternatives
Make, Prefect, Temporal, n8nOne alternative
Apache AirflowSix alternatives
AWS Step Functions, Apache Airflow, Argo Workflows, Dagster, Prefect, TemporalFour alternatives
Apache Airflow, Camunda, Microsoft Power Automate, TemporalMuse Glimmer 30BWorkatoApache AirflowChangedApache AirflowApache Airflow, n8nagainst: Amazon Managed Workflows for Apache Airflow, Astronomer Astro, Google Cloud Composerno first choiceagainst: Apache Airflow, LangChain, Microsoft AutoGen, Oozie
Four alternatives
Make, Microsoft Power Automate, ServiceNow Workflow, ZapierTwo alternatives
Dagster, PrefectThirteen alternatives
AWS Step Functions, BMC, Dagster, Inngest, Make, Pipedream, Prefect, Redwood Software, Stonebranch Universal Automation Center, Temporal, Trigger.dev, Zapier, n8nOne alternative
PrefectBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:54 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:06 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:05 | yes | 11 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:27 | yes | 19 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:41 | yes | 25 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:50 | yes | 11 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 13:43 | yes | 24 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 07:58 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 07:59 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 13:10 | yes | 17 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:28 | yes | 18 | 34 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:20 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 07:58 | yes | 6 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:00 | yes | 15 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 12:12 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:11 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:04 | yes | 7 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 07:47 | yes | 17 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:41 | yes | 24 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 12:44 | yes | 13 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:30 | yes | 15 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:59 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:05 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:11 | yes | 19 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:40 | yes | 14 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:47 | yes | 9 | 40 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:45 | yes | 2 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 07:42 | yes | 14 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:53 | yes | 9 | 10 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:07 | yes | 2 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:25 | yes | 8 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 12:53 | yes | 20 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:36 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:36 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:24 | yes | 20 | 42 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 13:13 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:31 | yes | 10 | 29 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:35 | yes | 12 | 25 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:34 | yes | 20 | 36 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 13:05 | yes | 15 | 29 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 07:54 | yes | 6 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:58 | yes | 15 | 37 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 12:28 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 12:23 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:25 | yes | 8 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:02 | yes | 18 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:39 | yes | 23 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:04 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:44 | yes | 25 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:49 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:07 | yes | 9 | 37 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:28 | yes | 17 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:33 | yes | 15 | 46 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 13:10 | no | 0 | 45 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:41 | yes | 2 | 11 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 13:36 | yes | 15 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 07:28 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:59 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:26 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 13:12 | yes | 20 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:27 | yes | 18 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:47 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 07:43 | yes | 24 | 63 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:47 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:41 | yes | 10 | 49 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:51 | yes | 12 | 23 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:01 | yes | 9 | 73 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 12:50 | yes | 10 | 31 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:02 | yes | 4 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 12:57 | yes | 12 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 12:14 | yes | 13 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:43 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:03 | yes | 26 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:10 | yes | 20 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:06 | yes | 22 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 13:33 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:29 | yes | 23 | 34 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:00 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 12:41 | yes | 19 | 52 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:45 | yes | 25 | 31 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 12:28 | yes | 24 | 38 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:56 | yes | 23 | 30 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:27 | yes | 4 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:38 | yes | 24 | 32 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Argo read as Argo Workflows
Astronomer read as Astronomer Astro
Astronomer Cloud read as Astronomer Astro
Databricks read as Databricks Lakeflow Jobs
MuleSoft read as MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
Stonebranch read as Stonebranch Universal Automation Center
Unresolved, counted raw
ArcGIS Workflow Manager (Classic)
Cron Jobs / Bash Scripts
Flo
HubSpot workflows
LangGraph
Microsoft AutoGen
Native HubSpot Workflows
Netflix Maestro
Node-RED
Oozie
Revo
RollWorks
Rundeck
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.