Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 78 of 81, unchanged
1 category · RankedCamunda
67Judge labels
5First choices
12Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
9% in Orchestration for enterprise buyers
Rank 16 of 79 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 11% of its 19 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Camunda →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business85 of 86
0%12 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market16 of 79
0%19 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise5 of 108
9%33 labels
accepted challenger
In orchestration · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Camunda for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workflow orchestration | Data platform | 0% | 16 of 79 | 11% | 19 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Camunda held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Orchestration · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 14 → 17 of 72
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 8% → 6%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
6%from 8% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 3 → 5 of 103
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Orchestration | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 14 → 16 of 79 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Camunda across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Camunda across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct8 labels3
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative14 labelsNone
Budget-constrained7 labels1
Scale-constrained14 labels1
Negative22 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative67 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Regulated, developer-heavy organizations that want a standardized process notation should look at Camunda” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Orchestration · comparative prompt · alternative
“Create a Shortlist of 2–3 tools from different tiers (e.g., Make + Workato + Camunda)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Orchestration · scale prompt · alternative
“BPMN‑compliant enterprise process automation, audit trails | Camunda” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Orchestration · comparative prompt · alternative
“We need BPMN-style business process modeling | Camunda Community (free)” MiniMax M2.5 · Orchestration · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Embedded Workflow Engines (Camunda, etc.) - Classloading conflicts... Configuration complexity... Deployment friction” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Orchestration · negative prompt · soft negative
“Camunda | Pure data pipelines (it's for BPM/business processes)” Kimi K2 · Orchestration · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Camunda, over the 67 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Camunda was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Camunda, over the 67 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Camunda was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Camunda. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 61 of the 67 answers that named Camunda and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
kestra.io25
larksuite.com25
teamwork.com25
kanerika.com22
wrike.com21
bmc.com20
elementum.ai19
ones.com18
zapier.com17
pracdata.io16
208 of the 208 domain citations in answers naming Camunda came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
camunda.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Camunda takes 0% of first choices and Prefect takes 21%.ShowHide
Search and answers
camunda.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Camunda takes 0% of first choices and Prefect takes 21%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “workflow orchestration tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “workflow orchestration tools”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 5,400 a month (“camunda”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 237 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 13,960 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,369 · 277 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 5,195
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 16 of 79 in orchestration
Segment leader
21%
Prefect
- First choices
- 5 across its categories
- Named in
- 67 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 61 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on camunda.com
3,868
subdomains included
Content
2,937
counted in the table below
Documentation
50
Product · Integration
57 · 208
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,392 | 34 | 2026-09-01 | ||
| Conference or event | 1,009 | 0 | 2023-12-01 | ||
| Case study | 330 | undated | |||
| News or press | 102 | 0 | 2014-07-01 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 46 | 0 | 2024-06-01 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 29 | 0 | 2024-07-01 | ||
| Podcast or video | 11 | 0 | 2024-03-01 | ||
| Comparison | 10 | 0 | 2024-07-01 | ||
| Report or ebook | 4 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 4 | 0 | 2025-07-01 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-01Why bolting ai onto legacy workflows fails and what nyc enterprise leaders are doing about it blog
- 2026-09-01Processos momentum across industries blog
- 2026-09-01A simpler more connected camunda experience meet the camundasuccess center blog
- 2026-09-01Stop stitching logs to explain an ai agents decision blog
- 2026-09-01The data says it ai isnt failing you your processes are blog
- 2026-09-01Where ai really creates value and where it doesnt blog
Events in person
Upcoming
- November 9, 2026 to November 12, 2026Gartner IT Symposium/Xpo™ 2026place not stated · takes part
Last twelve months
- October 19, 2026 to October 22, 2026Gartner IT Symposium//Xpo™ Orlando 2026place not stated · attended
- June 25, 2026 to June 26, 2026Reuters: The Future of Insurance 2026place not stated · hosted
As the event pages on camunda.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page camunda.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Camunda
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Camunda; a claim can dispute any of them.
Camunda (BPMN) 1
Follow Camunda
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Camunda is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Camunda is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The open platform for agentic orchestration
- For
- enterprises
- Price stated
- Start free for development, then run in production — self-managed or in the cloud. camunda.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Try Free camunda.com
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type IIISO/IEC 27001GDPRTISAXCloud Security Alliance
- Hosting
- EUAWSGoogle CloudAzureOpenShifton-prem
- Customers named
- BarclaysIntuitDeutsche TelekomBT24 Hour FitnessAtlassianathenahealthFirst American
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, integrations
What Camunda's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: camunda.com, camunda.com/pricing, camunda.com/security, camunda.com/platform, camunda.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Camunda's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Camunda, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Camunda by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Camunda is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Camunda, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.