Microsoft · 4 categories · RankedMicrosoft Power Automate
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robotic process automation | IT operations and endpoint | 51% | 1 of 68 | 6% | 72 | endorsed leader | |
| Process mining | IT operations and endpoint | 5% | 6 of 61 | 7% | 14 | accepted challenger | |
| Workflow orchestration | Data platform | 2% | 10 of 79 | 12% | 16 | accepted challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Intelligent document processing | Data platform | 0% | 66 of 89 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Nanonets at 32% |
Movement
By model
How each model treated Microsoft Power Automate across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Grok 4.20 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 11 |
| Mistral Small | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 8 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 8 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 8 |
| Kimi K2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 8 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 10 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 8 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“the best RPA platform is usually one of these two: 1. Microsoft Power Automate — best if your company already uses Microsoft 365/Windows and wants a low entry cost” GPT-5.4 mini · RPA · budget prompt · first choice
“mid-market companies evaluate Microsoft Power Automate (especially if you are already heavily invested in the Microsoft 365 ecosystem)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · RPA · scale prompt · first choice
“If your company is already using Microsoft products, Power Automate is likely the most cost-effective and easiest to implement.” Mistral Small · RPA · budget prompt · first choice
“For most mid-market B2B companies, Microsoft Power Automate delivers the best balance of cost, speed to value, and capability” DeepSeek V4 Flash · RPA · direct prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“if your environment is not already Microsoft-centric, because its value is strongest inside the Microsoft ecosystem, and costs can rise quickly” Perplexity Sonar · RPA · negative prompt · soft negative
“Be cautious for heavy non-Microsoft estates or complex attended/unattended enterprise governance.” Muse Glimmer 30B · RPA · negative prompt · soft negative
“30-day workflow duration limit... licensing... can get confusing, and it often needs an IT admin” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Orchestration · negative prompt · soft negative
“it may not be suitable for organizations that do not use Microsoft 365” Llama 4 Maverick · RPA · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Microsoft Power Automate, over the 333 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Microsoft Power Automate was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 314 of the 333 answers that named Microsoft Power Automate and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
738 of the 738 domain citations in answers naming Microsoft Power Automate came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where Microsoft Power Automate stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 14,800 a month (“microsoft power automate”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 477 a month
- Its own site
- It sits on Microsoft's site (microsoft.com), so there are no site figures for it alone
In answers
This edition- Named in
- 333 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 314 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Microsoft Power Automate
Follow Microsoft Power Automate
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Microsoft is the company behind Microsoft Power Automate.ShowHide
The company
On record
Company records- Also from Microsoft
- Microsoft 365, Microsoft 365 Admin Center, Microsoft 365 Administration, Microsoft 365 Backup, Microsoft 365 Compliance Center, Microsoft 365 Copilot, Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat, Microsoft 365 DSC and 164 more
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Решавайте предизвикателствата пред бизнеса с инструменти, които не изискват програмиране, за вашите екипи.
- Price stated
- Вижте плановете и цените microsoft.com/bg-bg/microsoft-365/business/microsoft-powerapps
- Customers named
- Групата за застраховане HanoverHanover Insurance GroupCineplexHolland America LineCommonwealth Bank of Australia (CBA)
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Microsoft Power Automate's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: microsoft.com/bg-bg/microsoft-365/business/microsoft-powerapps, microsoft.com/bg-bg/microsoft-copilot/copilot-101/ai-automation, microsoft.com/sr-latn-rs/microsoft-copilot/copilot-101/ai-automation, microsoft.com/bg-bg/microsoft-copilot/copilot-101/workflow-automation, microsoft.com/de-de/microsoft-copilot/copilot-101/workflow-automation. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Microsoft Power Automate's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Microsoft Power Automate, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Microsoft Power Automate by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Microsoft Power Automate is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Microsoft Power Automate, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Microsoft Power Automate is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
AI models recommend Microsoft Power Automate first in Robotic process automation this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.