Every category where a model named Microsoft Power Automate for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Workflow orchestration	Data platform	0%	17 of 86	10%	10	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Microsoft Power Automate yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Microsoft Power Automate across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	2	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	1	0	3
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative12 labelsNone

Budget-constrained9 labels3

Scale-constrained6 labelsNone

Negative9 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative40 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you're deeply invested in Microsoft 365: Choose Power Automate.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Orchestration · direct prompt · alternative

“Microsoft Power Automate if you're Microsoft 365-centric” Kimi K2 · Orchestration · scale prompt · alternative

“Microsoft‑heavy environments | Power Automate” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Orchestration · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“tie you into a single cloud or vendor ... risky if you need multi-cloud portability” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Orchestration · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Microsoft Power Automate, over the 40 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Microsoft Power Automate was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Apache Airflow30 of 402Not in the top three

Zapier26 of 4010Not in the top three

n8n26 of 403Not in the top three

Make25 of 406Not in the top three

Temporal24 of 403Not in the top three

Camunda21 of 402Not in the top three

Prefect21 of 401Not in the top three

Workato21 of 401Not in the top three

Dagster15 of 400Not in the top three

ServiceNow12 of 401Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Microsoft Power Automate. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 36 of the 40 answers that named Microsoft Power Automate and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

zapier.com33

elementum.ai24

teamwork.com21

wrike.com19

enate.io16

software.reibuys.com14

reddit.com13

thedigitalprojectmanager.com13

devopsschool.com12

automationatlas.io10

175 of the 175 domain citations in answers naming Microsoft Power Automate came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

zapier.com/blog/workflow-orchestration-tools32

elementum.ai/blog/best-workflow-orchestration-tools24

teamwork.com/blog/workflow-orchestration-tools21

wrike.com/workflow-guide/workflow-orchestration-tools19

enate.io/blog/workflow-orchestration-tools16

software.reibuys.com/workflow-orchestration-software-complete-buyers-guide-202414

devopsschool.com/blog/top-10-workflow-orchestration-tools-features-pros-cons-comparison12

thedigitalprojectmanager.com/tools/workflow-orchestration-tools12

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Microsoft Power Automate

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Microsoft Power Automate; a claim can dispute any of them.

Power Automate 5Azure Logic Apps / Microsoft Power Automate 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Microsoft Power Automate's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Microsoft Power Automate, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at microsoft.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.