AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Data platform › Orchestration › n8n vs Make
Workflow orchestration · October 2026 Edition

n8n vs Make

One of fourteen models named n8n first on the direct prompt; six named Make. n8n was named by eleven of the fourteen models and Make by twelve and n8n carries 28 labels and Make 27, so the shares are not directly comparable.

n8n

accepted challenger

Named in five categories this edition.

Make

criticized challenger

Named in five categories this edition.

First-choice share14%12%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate14%26%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#5A position in a field of 14; printed, not drawn.
Labels2827A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, n8n reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Prefect vs n8n · Prefect vs Make · Apache Airflow vs n8n

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the workflow orchestration page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
n8nFirst choices, of fourteen modelsMake
Direct161 against Make
Paraphrase00
Comparative00
Budget-constrained711 against Make
Scale-constrained003 against n8n
Negative001 against n8n · 5 against Make
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, n8n and Make were named in the same answer seventy-four times, of the 121 answers naming n8n and the 118 naming Make. In those answers Make took the first choice twenty-one times and n8n eight.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where n8n and Make stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
n8n Make first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, n8n on the left and Make on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where n8n and Make stood in it.

n8n first, Make not the choice

1 of 14 modelsMake was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
DeepSeek V4 Flashn8n alternatives: Microsoft Power Automate, Zapier

Make first, n8n an alternative

6 of 14 modelsn8n was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5Make, Zapier alternatives: Prefect, n8n
Gemini 3.5 FlashMake, Prefect alternatives: Astronomer Astro, Dagster, Workato, n8n
Grok 4.1 FastMake, Zapier alternatives: Apache Airflow, Microsoft Power Automate, Prefect, Tray.io, n8n
Qwen 3.7 FlashMake alternatives: Kissflow, Microsoft Power Automate, Native HubSpot Workflows, Nintex
Kimi K2Make alternatives: Tray.io, Workato, n8n
GLM 4.7 FlashXMake alternatives: Zapier, n8n

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Perplexity SonarWorkato alternatives: HubSpot workflows, Make, SnapLogic, Zapier, n8n
GPT-6 LunaWorkato alternatives: Make, Prefect, Temporal, n8n
Muse Glimmer 30BWorkato alternatives: Make, Microsoft Power Automate, ServiceNow Workflow, Zapier

Neither was named

4 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniPrefect alternatives: Apache Airflow, Dagster, Temporal
Mistral SmallHubSpot Marketing Hub alternatives: Kissflow, Microsoft Power Automate, Revo, Tray.io
Llama 4 MaverickKissflow alternatives: HubSpot Marketing Hub, Microsoft Power Automate
MiniMax M2.5Microsoft Power Automate, Tray.io alternatives: Zapier

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Make leads by nine points.
Make24%#1 of 12
n8n15%#3 of 12
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: n8n leads at mid-market.
n8n14%#4 of 14
Make12%#5 of 14
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
n8n0%#15 of 16
Make0%#– of 16
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about n8n

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Free self-hosted, good for custom workflows, requires DevOps to manage.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · scale prompt · soft negative
“n8n for a client-facing product unless the license fits your exact use.” GPT-6 Luna · negative prompt · soft negative
“Limited for complex/ high-volume enterprise. | If not data-heavy.” Grok 4.1 Fast · scale prompt · soft negative
“If you have one developer willing to install software on a cheap Linux server ($5/month VPS), go with n8n. It provides the most flexibility and power for the lowest cost” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“the cheapest to run today is usually n8n Community on a small VPS” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“Winner: n8n (Self-Hosted) ... can be self-hosted for free” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Make

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of six in this category shown.

“Avoid No-Code (Zapier/Make) for data infrastructure, ETL, and backend logic.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“If your budget is bleeding from expensive tools like Zapier or Make” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Good visual builder at a budget price ($9/mo) — but workflows get messy at scale.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · soft negative
“Make is usually the best overall choice if you want a low-cost, user-friendly automation platform with a generous free tier” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
“Make typically offers the best balance of features, pricing, and ease of use for mid-market B2B companies” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
“Make.com is the most cost-effective and powerful engine for a mid-market B2B budget” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.