AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Astronomer Astro · October 2026 Edition
Astronomer · 1 category · Ranked

Astronomer Astro

45Judge labels
2First choices
4Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in Orchestration for enterprise buyers
Rank 17 of 79 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 6% of its 16 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Astronomer Astro →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In orchestration · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Astronomer Astro for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Workflow orchestrationData platform0%17 of 796%16accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Astronomer Astro held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Orchestration · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 18 → 17 of 81
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 16 of 72, unchanged
Enterprise▼−6Since September 2026: 10% → 4%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 10% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 5 pointsRank 2 → 8 of 103

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Orchestration0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 16 → 17 of 79

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Astronomer Astro across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash02103
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2002103
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00303
Kimi K201102
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00112

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labels1
Paraphrase17 labels1
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained5 labelsNone
Scale-constrained8 labelsNone
Negative7 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative45 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Managed Airflow (e.g., Astronomer or AWS MWAA): If you specifically want the industry-standard Airflow” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Orchestration · scale prompt · alternative
“Start with managed Airflow (Astronomer or cloud-native options) to reduce operational burden” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Orchestration · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Use managed options (Astronomer from ~$0.35/hr) to skip self-hosting pains.” Grok 4.20 · Orchestration · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Astronomer provides a fully managed, enterprise-ready version of Airflow.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Orchestration · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Managed options such as MWAA, Cloud Composer or Astronomer exist but "the pricing is hard to justify for smaller teams."” Muse Glimmer 30B · Orchestration · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Astronomer Astro, over the 45 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Astronomer Astro was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Apache Airflow43 of 4513Not among the top eight
Prefect39 of 4514Not among the top eight
Dagster39 of 459Not among the top eight
Temporal22 of 451Not among the top eight
Amazon Managed Workflows for Apache Airflow17 of 450Not among the top eight
Google Cloud Composer16 of 450Not among the top eight
n8n14 of 454Not among the top eight
Zapier13 of 450Not among the top eight
Make12 of 453Not among the top eight
Kestra12 of 451Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Astronomer Astro. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 41 of the 45 answers that named Astronomer Astro and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

kestra.io22
getorchestra.io20
cognism.com16
tech-insider.org13
wrike.com12
cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com11
elementum.ai11
devopsschool.com10
medium.com10
datamation.com9

134 of the 134 domain citations in answers naming Astronomer Astro came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

astronomer.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Astronomer Astro takes 0% of first choices and Prefect takes 21%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “workflow orchestration tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “workflow orchestration tools”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
170 a month (“astronomer astro”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
12 a month
Its company's site
astronomer.io shared with Astronomer's other products; the figures are the site's
Organic visits to its site
about 77,826 a month
Searches its site ranks for
2,019 · 445 in the top three
Sites linking to it
3,103
Paid Google search
2 searches its ads show for, about 11 clicks and $0 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
120+ ads · 114 text, 4 video, 2 image · 46 shown in the last 30 days

First shown November 2024, as Astronomer, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 83 in the year, 37 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 17 of 79 in orchestration
Segment leader
21%
Prefect
First choices
2 across its categories
Named in
45 answers
Its own site cited
in 41 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Astronomer Astro

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Astronomer Astro; a claim can dispute any of them.
Astronomer 12Astro 1Astro by Astronomer 1Astro/Astronomer 1Astronomer Cloud 1

Follow Astronomer Astro

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Astronomer is the company behind Astronomer Astro.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
a modern data orchestration platform powered by Apache Airflow®
Customers named
Custom InkTrellixCollibraFaire
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Astronomer Astro's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: astronomer.io/accelerate-astro. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Astronomer Astro's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Astronomer Astro, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Astronomer Astro by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Astronomer Astro is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Astronomer Astro, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at astronomer.io is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.