Every category where a model named Astronomer Astro for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Workflow orchestration	Data platform	0%	16 of 86	8%	13	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Astronomer Astro yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Astronomer Astro across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	2	1	0	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	1	3
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	3	0	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	2	0	2
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase17 labels4

Comparative4 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained7 labels1

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative38 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Only choose Airflow if you are willing to pay for a managed SaaS provider like Astronomer” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Orchestration · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“look at modern, lightweight, or fully managed alternatives (like Dagster, Prefect, or Astro)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Orchestration · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Managed (Astronomer/MWAA) $1,500+/month—skip those.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Orchestration · budget prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Astronomer Astro, over the 38 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Astronomer Astro was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Prefect35 of 388Not in the top three

Dagster35 of 387Not in the top three

Apache Airflow35 of 385Not in the top three

Temporal16 of 381Not in the top three

Zapier11 of 383Not in the top three

Make11 of 381Not in the top three

Amazon Managed Workflows for Apache Airflow10 of 380Not in the top three

Camunda10 of 380Not in the top three

AWS Step Functions9 of 380Not in the top three

n8n8 of 381Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Astronomer Astro. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 27 of the 38 answers that named Astronomer Astro and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

getorchestra.io16

aimultiple.com14

cognism.com13

reddit.com13

datavidhya.com11

elementum.ai10

andreinita.co9

zapier.com9

devopsschool.com8

ovaledge.com7

110 of the 110 domain citations in answers naming Astronomer Astro came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

aimultiple.com/data-orchestration-tools13

cognism.com/blog/data-orchestration-tools13

datavidhya.com/blog/airflow-vs-dagster-vs-prefect11

elementum.ai/blog/best-workflow-orchestration-tools10

andreinita.co/blog/airflow-vs-prefect-vs-dagster9

zapier.com/blog/workflow-orchestration-tools9

getorchestra.io/guides/data-orchestration-tools-comparison7

ovaledge.com/blog/data-orchestration-tools7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Astronomer Astro

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Astronomer Astro; a claim can dispute any of them.

Astronomer 10Astro 2Astronomer Cloud 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Astronomer Astro's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Astronomer Astro, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at astronomer.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.