| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workflow orchestration | Data platform | 0% | 13 of 86 | 16% | 38 | accepted challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Temporal is the top choice for long‑running, stateful workflows where durability matters most.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Orchestration · comparative prompt · first choice
“Temporal is designed for durable execution with deterministic workflow patterns and workflow replay, which reduces state drift during restarts.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Orchestration · negative prompt · alternative
“Use open-standard alternatives (like Temporal, Camunda, or Kestra) if portability is a priority.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Orchestration · negative prompt · alternative
“Better alternatives: Tools with long‑running, stateful execution models (e.g., Temporal‑style workflows).” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Orchestration · negative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid Temporal unless you explicitly have long-running business-critical processes and dedicated backend engineers” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Orchestration · direct prompt · hard negative
“Temporal is powerful for long-running, complex workflows ... but it's overkill for simple, short tasks” Mistral Small · Orchestration · negative prompt · soft negative
“Focuses on microservice orchestration, but lacks native AI and human-in-the-loop features.” Mistral Small · Orchestration · comparative prompt · soft negative
“Airflow, Temporal, etc. are powerful but may be over-engineering” MiniMax M2.5 · Orchestration · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 68 of the 89 answers that named Temporal and are not a share of its labels.
291 of the 291 domain citations in answers naming Temporal came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Temporal's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Temporal, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at temporal.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.