IT AI Index
Index Vendors › Temporal · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Temporal

90Judge labels
6First choices
22Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
8% in Orchestration for enterprise buyers
Rank 13 of 86 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 16% of its 38 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In orchestration · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Temporal for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Workflow orchestrationData platform0%13 of 8616%38accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Temporal yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Temporal across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501102
GPT-5.4 mini01203
Gemini 3.5 Flash01315
Perplexity Sonar00112
Grok 4.1 Fast01203
Mistral Small00123
DeepSeek V4 Flash02114
Llama 4 Maverick00202
Qwen 3.7 Flash01102
Kimi K203205
GLM 4.7 FlashX11103
MiniMax M2.501214

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct16 labels5
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative19 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained12 labelsNone
Scale-constrained15 labels1
Negative28 labels3not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative90 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 10 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Temporal is the top choice for long‑running, stateful workflows where durability matters most.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Orchestration · comparative prompt · first choice
“Temporal is designed for durable execution with deterministic workflow patterns and workflow replay, which reduces state drift during restarts.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Orchestration · negative prompt · alternative
“Use open-standard alternatives (like Temporal, Camunda, or Kestra) if portability is a priority.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Orchestration · negative prompt · alternative
“Better alternatives: Tools with long‑running, stateful execution models (e.g., Temporal‑style workflows).” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Orchestration · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid Temporal unless you explicitly have long-running business-critical processes and dedicated backend engineers” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Orchestration · direct prompt · hard negative
“Temporal is powerful for long-running, complex workflows ... but it's overkill for simple, short tasks” Mistral Small · Orchestration · negative prompt · soft negative
“Focuses on microservice orchestration, but lacks native AI and human-in-the-loop features.” Mistral Small · Orchestration · comparative prompt · soft negative
“Airflow, Temporal, etc. are powerful but may be over-engineering” MiniMax M2.5 · Orchestration · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Temporal, over the 89 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Temporal was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Apache Airflow77 of 897Not in the top three
Prefect64 of 898Not in the top three
Dagster52 of 894Not in the top three
Camunda49 of 892Not in the top three
Zapier46 of 897Not in the top three
n8n40 of 897Not in the top three
Make37 of 898Not in the top three
AWS Step Functions34 of 890Not in the top three
Workato28 of 892Not in the top three
Argo Workflows28 of 890Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Temporal. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 68 of the 89 answers that named Temporal and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

zapier.com44
elementum.ai43
enate.io35
teamwork.com35
reddit.com30
wrike.com27
devopsschool.com24
kanerika.com20
unmeshed.io18
getorchestra.io15

291 of the 291 domain citations in answers naming Temporal came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Temporal

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Temporal; a claim can dispute any of them.
Prefect/Temporal 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Temporal's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Temporal, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at temporal.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack