AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › n8n · October 2026 Edition
5 categories · Ranked

n8n

121Judge labels
17First choices
16Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
5Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
15% in Orchestration for small business buyers
Rank 4 of 79 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 14% of its 28 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of n8n →
By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
In orchestration · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named n8n for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Workflow orchestrationData platform14%4 of 7914%28accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 8% → 12%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
SOAR platformsSecurity operations0%17 of 670%5under 10 labels · led by Tines at 41%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Robotic process automationIT operations and endpoint0%16 of 680%4under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Power Automate at 51%
AI IT support agentsIT operations and endpoint0%44 of 1210%2under 10 labels · led by Freshservice with Freddy AI at 11%
AI SOC agentsSecurity operations0%85 of 1040%1under 10 labels · led by Dropzone AI at 24%

Movement

Since September 2026, n8n held within the floor in all five categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Orchestration · by segment

Small business▲+1Since September 2026: 15% → 17%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
17%from 15% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 4 → 3 of 81
Mid-market▲+4Since September 2026: 8% → 12%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
12%from 8% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 5 of 72, unchanged
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 18 → 98 of 103

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Orchestration8%12%▲+4Since September 2026: 8% → 12%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 5 → 4 of 79
SOAR0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 32 → 17 of 67
RPA0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 16 of 68, unchanged
AI IT agents0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 44 of 121, unchanged
AI SOC agents0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 85 of 104, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated n8n across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.511204
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash16007
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.2001012
Mistral Small01102
DeepSeek V4 Flash20305
Llama 4 Maverick01001
Qwen 3.7 Flash13004
Kimi K212115
GLM 4.7 FlashX02013
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna11013
Muse Glimmer 30B11103

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct23 labels2
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative18 labelsNone
Budget-constrained36 labels14
Scale-constrained16 labels1
Negative26 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative121 labels in all, every segment counted; 17 of the 19 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you have one developer willing to install software on a cheap Linux server ($5/month VPS), go with n8n. It provides the most flexibility and power for the lowest cost” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Orchestration · budget prompt · first choice
“the cheapest to run today is usually n8n Community on a small VPS” Muse Glimmer 30B · Orchestration · budget prompt · first choice
“Winner: n8n (Self-Hosted) ... can be self-hosted for free” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Orchestration · budget prompt · first choice
“n8n if you mean automating business apps and APIs” GPT-6 Luna · Orchestration · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Free self-hosted, good for custom workflows, requires DevOps to manage.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Orchestration · scale prompt · soft negative
“n8n for a client-facing product unless the license fits your exact use.” GPT-6 Luna · Orchestration · negative prompt · soft negative
“Limited for complex/ high-volume enterprise. | If not data-heavy.” Grok 4.20 · Orchestration · scale prompt · soft negative
“Less robust for complex orchestration” Kimi K2 · Orchestration · scale prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as n8n, over the 121 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and n8n was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Make74 of 12121Compare →
Temporal41 of 1211Not among the top eight
Microsoft Power Automate34 of 1219Not among the top eight
Camunda26 of 1210Not among the top eight
Argo Workflows20 of 1210Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named n8n. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 111 of the 121 answers that named n8n and are not a share of its labels.

Search and answers

n8n.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, n8n takes 14% of first choices and Prefect takes 21%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “workflow orchestration tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “workflow orchestration tools”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
165,000 a month (“n8n”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
2,786 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 133,599 a month
Searches its site ranks for
12,683 · 1,431 in the top three
Sites linking to it
26,477
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
84 ads · 58 video, 13 image, 13 text · 42 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2023, as n8n GmbH, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 83 in the year, 1 before. 31 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
14%
rank 4 of 79 in orchestration
Segment leader
21%
Prefect
First choices
17 across its categories
Named in
121 answers
Its own site cited
in 111 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on n8n.io
163,186
subdomains included
Content
2,848
counted in the table below
Documentation
3
Product · Integration
0 · 147,208
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Report or ebook1,49202025-11-21
Webinar or virtual event635undated
Blog282462026-09-25
Conference or event21802026-02-07
Glossary or explainer79undated
Comparison5162026-09-10
Podcast or video43undated
Case study35undated
Template or tool9undated
News or press4undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page n8n.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as n8n

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as n8n; a claim can dispute any of them.
n8n (Community Edition) 1n8n (Self-Hosted Community Edition) 1n8n (Self-Hosted) 1n8n (self-hosted OSS) 1n8n Community Edition 1

Follow n8n

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

n8n is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
AI workflow automation platform
For
technical teams
Price stated
All plans include unlimited users & workflows and every integration. Pricing based on monthly workflow executions, regardless of complexity. n8n.io/pricing
Starting price
20€/mo, billed annually n8n.io/pricing
Free plan or trial
Get started for free n8n.io
Integrations claimed
500 n8n.io
Certifications
GDPRSOC 2 Type 2SOC 3SOC 2 audited
Hosting
EUFrankfurt, Germany
Customers named
HuelVodafoneTrendyolStepstoneIcatu SegurosSeguros BolívarQuidDelivery Hero

What n8n's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: n8n.io, n8n.io/pricing, trust.n8n.io, n8n.io/features, n8n.io/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when n8n's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as n8n, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for n8n by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where n8n is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name n8n, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at n8n.io is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.