Workforce identity and SSO for small business buyers
Asked as “workforce identity platform”, and as “single sign-on and identity provider for employees”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 56 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
48%
Clear leader
48JumpCloud32Microsoft Entra ID07Google Cloud Identity12others
48% of first choices, clear leader.
Since September 2026▼−1Since September 2026: 48% → 47%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.JumpCloud held the lead, −1 point on 48%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
JumpCloud48%Clear leader▼−1Since September 2026: 48% → 47%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageMid-market
Microsoft Entra ID46%Clear leader▲+6Since September 2026: 36% → 42%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →EnterpriseMicrosoft Entra ID49%Clear leader↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Microsoft Entra ID (47%) replaces Okta Workforce Identity (53% then, 45% now), 2 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →
JumpCloud48%Clear leader▼−1Since September 2026: 48% → 47%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageMid-marketMicrosoft Entra ID46%Clear leader▲+6Since September 2026: 36% → 42%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →EnterpriseMicrosoft Entra ID49%Clear leader↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Microsoft Entra ID (47%) replaces Okta Workforce Identity (53% then, 45% now), 2 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01JumpCloud48%3%69endorsed leader▼−1Since September 2026: 48% → 47%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.48% → 47%
JumpCloud48%3%69endorsed leader▼−1Since September 2026: 48% → 47%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.48% → 47%02Microsoft Entra ID32%9%75endorsed leader▼−3Since September 2026: 35% → 33%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.35% → 33%
Microsoft Entra ID32%9%75endorsed leader▼−3Since September 2026: 35% → 33%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.35% → 33%03
Google Cloud Identity Lab in the set7%9%32accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 6%
Google Cloud Identity Lab in the set7%9%32accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 6%04
OneLogin5%9%34accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 6%
OneLogin5%9%34accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 6%05
Okta Workforce Identity4%51%68criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 4%
Okta Workforce Identity4%51%68criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 4%06
miniOrange2%0%15accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
miniOrange2%0%15accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
09
Ping Identity0%53%17criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Ping Identity0%53%17criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%08
Auth00%20%15accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Auth00%20%15accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%07
Rippling0%0%16accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Rippling0%0%16accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Google Cloud Identity is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice one time of 4; the other thirteen models three times of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.
Head to head
All six head-to-head pages: the top four products, each against each
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203040506070809Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01JumpCloud48%
JumpCloud48%02Microsoft Entra ID32%
Microsoft Entra ID32%03Google Cloud Identity7%
Google Cloud Identity7%04OneLogin5%
OneLogin5%05Okta Workforce Identity4%
Okta Workforce Identity4%06miniOrange2%
miniOrange2%07Rippling0%
Rippling0%08Auth00%
Auth00%09Ping Identity0%
Ping Identity0%What they warned about
Eight of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, Qwen 3.7 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX and GPT-6 Luna changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Okta Workforce Identity51%
35 of 68 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“You don’t need Okta Enterprise ($2–$5+/user) for <50 employees unless you have complex compliance needs.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, budget prompt
Ping Identity53%
9 of 17 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Don’t choose an enterprise-grade platform (like Okta Enterprise or Ping Identity) if you’re a small team.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, budget prompt
CyberArk Identity78%
7 of 9 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Why to avoid: Explicitly designed for enterprises with dedicated security teams” Kimi K2, negative prompt
Microsoft Entra ID9%
7 of 75 labels negative · 6 of 14 models
“only recommended if your business is already deeply invested in the Microsoft ecosystem. Otherwise, you may end up paying for duplicate licensing and face vendor lock-in” Mistral Small, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
73 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 985 links across 204 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 51 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
50 answers · 103 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Siit33 answers · 49 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Okta25 answers · 28 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Corma24 answers · 25 citations · 10 models
22 answers · 24 citations · 9 models
vendor site · JumpCloud21 answers · 28 citations · 9 models
vendor site · G219 answers · 30 citations · 11 models
18 answers · 27 citations · 8 models
16 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Rippling15 answers · 19 citations · 8 models
14 answers · 21 citations · 8 models
14 answers · 20 citations · 6 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
25 answers · 9 models
24 answers · 12 models
21 answers · 10 models
20 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 8 models
15 answers · 7 models
15 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 8 models
14 answers · 8 models
14 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best workforce identity platform”, “workforce identity platform”, “workforce identity platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JumpCloud jumpcloud.com | 48% | 321 | 12,100 | 244 | 108,479 | $8,612 | 80 | |
| Microsoft parent site Microsoft Entra ID 32% | 32% | 480 | 2,240,000 | 403,136 | ||||
| Google Cloud google.dev Google Cloud Identity 7% | 7% | 42 | 165,000 | 7,596 | 881,346 | 109 | ||
| OneLogin onelogin.com | 5% | 119 | 60,500 | 562 | 315,519 | 0 | ||
| Okta Workforce Identity okta.com | 4% | 213 | 390 | 8 | 1,959,740 | 118 | 2 | |
| miniOrange miniorange.com | 2% | 39 | 1,300 | 18 | 48,290 | 17 | ||
| Cisco parent site Cisco Duo 2% | 2% | 198 | 165,000 | 48,352 | ||||
| Rippling rippling.com | 0% | 37 | 301,000 | 17,886 | 712,399 | $42,013 | 115 | |
| Auth0 auth0.com | 0% | 237 | 18,100 | 772 | 170,673 | 117 | ||
| WorkOS workos.com | 0% | 99 | 12,100 | 107 | 33,478 | 75 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 23 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (okta.com, startwithidentity.com). The first result for “best workforce identity platform” is thectoclub.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best workforce identity platform for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which single sign-on and identity provider for employees would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top workforce identity platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best workforce identity platform for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a workforce identity platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which workforce identity platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceagainst: Okta Workforce IdentityGoogle Cloud Identity, Microsoft Entra IDChangedJumpCloudJumpCloudagainst: Okta Workforce Identityno first choiceagainst: Okta Workforce Identity
One alternative
Okta Workforce IdentityTwo alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityTwo alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, OneLoginGPT-5.4 miniMicrosoft Entra IDMicrosoft Entra IDHeldJumpCloud, OneLoginJumpCloud, Microsoft Entra IDagainst: Okta Workforce Identityno first choiceagainst: CyberArk Identity, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
Two alternatives
Okta Workforce Identity, OneLoginThree alternatives
Google Cloud Identity, JumpCloud, Okta Workforce IdentityThree alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, RipplingGemini 3.5 FlashJumpCloudJumpCloudHeldagainst: Google Cloud Identity, Okta Workforce IdentityGoogle Cloud Identity, JumpCloudGoogle Cloud Identity, Microsoft Entra IDagainst: Okta Workforce Identity, Ping IdentityJumpCloudagainst: Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identityagainst: IBM Verify, Microsoft Entra ID Advanced Enterprise Tiers, Okta Workforce Identity, Oracle, Ping Identity, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Symantec Identity Governance and Administration
Three alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, RipplingTwo alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, RipplingThree alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, RipplingFour alternatives
Authentik, Cisco Duo, Cloudflare One, JumpCloudFour alternatives
1Password, Bitwarden, Google Cloud Identity, RipplingPerplexity SonarJumpCloudMicrosoft Entra ID, OneLoginChangedJumpCloudJumpCloud, Microsoft Entra IDno first choiceagainst: CyberArk Identity, IBM ISAM, Okta Workforce Identity, Oracle Identity Governance, Ping Identity, SailPoint IdentityIQ / Identity Security Cloud, Saviynt
Three alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, OneLoginOne alternative
Google Cloud IdentityThree alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, OneLoginOne alternative
Cisco DuoGrok 4.1 FastJumpCloudJumpCloudHeldJumpCloudJumpCloudno first choiceagainst: Auth0, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, Ping Identity
Two alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityFour alternatives
Google Cloud Identity, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, OneLoginThree alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, OneLoginThree alternatives
Google Cloud Identity, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityMistral SmallJumpCloud, OneLoginagainst: Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityOkta Workforce IdentityChangedJumpCloudagainst: Okta Workforce IdentityJumpCloud, miniOrangeno first choiceagainst: Cisco Duo, Okta Workforce Identityagainst: ForgeRock Identity Platform, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, OneLogin, Ping Identity
One alternative
SSOJetThree alternatives
Google Cloud Identity, JumpCloud, Microsoft Entra IDThree alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, OneLogin, miniOrangeDeepSeek V4 FlashJumpCloudagainst: Okta Workforce Identity, OneLoginJumpCloudHeldagainst: Okta Workforce IdentityJumpCloud, Microsoft Entra IDMicrosoft Entra IDagainst: Cisco Duo, CyberArk Identity, Okta Workforce Identity, SailPoint Identity Security CloudMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, OneLoginagainst: ForgeRock Identity Platform, Ping Identityagainst: CyberArk Identity, ForgeRock Identity Platform, IBM Verify, ManageEngine ADSelfService Plus, Okta Workforce Identity, Omada, OneLogin, Ping Identity, RSA IGA, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Saviynt, Thales SafeNet
Three alternatives
Auth0, Microsoft Entra ID, WorkOSTwo alternatives
Google Cloud Identity, Microsoft Entra IDThree alternatives
Okta Workforce Identity, OneLogin, miniOrangeTwo alternatives
Google Cloud Identity, JumpCloudOne alternative
JumpCloudLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldJumpCloudMicrosoft Entra IDno first choiceagainst: IBM ISAM, Okta Workforce Identity, Oracle Identity Governance, SailPoint IdentityIQ, Saviynt
Four alternatives
Auth0, CyberArk Identity, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityTwo alternatives
JumpCloud, RipplingQwen 3.7 FlashJumpCloudCisco DuoChangedGoogle Cloud Identity, JumpCloud, Microsoft Entra IDagainst: Okta Workforce IdentityJumpCloud, Microsoft Entra IDagainst: Okta Workforce Identity, Ping Identityno first choiceagainst: CyberArk Identityagainst: Broadcom (formerly CA Technologies) Identity Manager, Oracle Identity Governance, SAP Identity Management
Three alternatives
Google Identity, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityFour alternatives
Google Cloud Identity, JumpCloud, Microsoft Entra ID, OneLoginOne alternative
RipplingTwo alternatives
Google Cloud Identity, SSOJetThree alternatives
JumpCloud Directory-as-a-Service, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityKimi K2JumpCloudJumpCloudHeldagainst: Google Cloud Identity, Okta Workforce IdentityJumpCloudagainst: Okta Workforce IdentityGoogle Cloud Identityagainst: Okta Workforce IdentityJumpCloud, Microsoft Entra IDagainst: Okta Workforce Identityagainst: CyberArk Identity, ForgeRock Identity Platform, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
Five alternatives
Google Cloud Identity, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, OneLogin, RipplingOne alternative
Microsoft Entra IDThree alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, OneLogin, RipplingThree alternatives
JumpCloud, Microsoft Entra ID, OneLoginGLM 4.7 FlashXJumpCloud, Microsoft Entra IDJumpCloudChangedMicrosoft Entra IDagainst: Auth0Microsoft Entra IDno first choiceagainst: CyberArk Identity, Idira Identity
Two alternatives
Entrust Identity as a Service, Okta Workforce IdentityTwo alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, WorkOSFour alternatives
JumpCloud, Okta Workforce Identity, OneLogin, Ping IdentityFour alternatives
Auth0, Cisco Duo, JumpCloud, Ping IdentityMiniMax M2.5JumpCloudJumpCloudHeldJumpCloudagainst: Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra IDagainst: Auth0Microsoft Entra IDagainst: JumpCloud, Okta Workforce Identity
Two alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityTwo alternatives
Google Cloud Identity, Microsoft Entra IDThree alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, OneLogin, miniOrangeOne alternative
miniOrangeTwo alternatives
JumpCloud, Okta Workforce IdentityGPT-6 LunaJumpCloudMicrosoft Entra IDChangedGoogle Cloud Identity, Microsoft Entra IDagainst: Okta Workforce IdentityGoogle Cloud Identityagainst: Okta Workforce Identityno first choiceagainst: Google Cloud Identity, JumpCloud, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity
Two alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityTwo alternatives
JumpCloud, RipplingTwo alternatives
JumpCloud, Microsoft Entra IDMuse Glimmer 30BJumpCloudJumpCloudHeldJumpCloudagainst: Okta Workforce IdentityJumpCloud, Microsoft Entra IDagainst: Okta Workforce Identityno first choiceagainst: IBM ISAM, Okta Workforce Identity, Oracle Identity Governance, Ping Identity, SailPoint IdentityIQ, Saviynt
Four alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, Rippling, Zoho DirectoryOne alternative
Microsoft Entra IDTwo alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, OneLoginOne alternative
RipplingBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 13:08 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:57 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 07:59 | yes | 12 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:39 | yes | 17 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 13:01 | yes | 25 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:41 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:46 | yes | 23 | 30 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:56 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 12:44 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:17 | yes | 10 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 07:41 | yes | 10 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 12:10 | yes | 15 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:50 | yes | 3 | 12 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 07:57 | yes | 15 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 07:47 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 12:15 | yes | 4 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:02 | yes | 8 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 07:54 | yes | 14 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:28 | yes | 21 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:48 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 13:20 | yes | 22 | 40 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:01 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:03 | no | 0 | 34 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:23 | yes | 10 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 13:22 | yes | 25 | 70 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:12 | yes | 10 | 55 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:04 | yes | 1 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 12:41 | yes | 20 | 34 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:39 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 07:38 | yes | 4 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 12:46 | yes | 15 | 27 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:29 | yes | 21 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:04 | yes | 23 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 13:48 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:20 | yes | 22 | 38 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:45 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:47 | yes | 9 | 29 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 07:57 | yes | 19 | 27 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:22 | yes | 15 | 50 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:22 | yes | 9 | 17 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:16 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:16 | yes | 24 | 47 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:00 | yes | 18 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:26 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:46 | yes | 14 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 12:35 | yes | 23 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:05 | yes | 25 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:48 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:05 | yes | 22 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 12:06 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:17 | yes | 5 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:23 | yes | 20 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:01 | yes | 12 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:27 | yes | 13 | 32 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:30 | yes | 4 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:15 | yes | 15 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 13:35 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:18 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:36 | yes | 8 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 12:50 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:40 | yes | 18 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:20 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:44 | yes | 18 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:00 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:37 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 12:22 | yes | 19 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:26 | yes | 25 | 31 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:47 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 13:01 | yes | 3 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 13:16 | no | 0 | 1 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 07:45 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:31 | yes | 6 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 07:48 | yes | 14 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:22 | yes | 21 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:36 | yes | 25 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 07:36 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:34 | yes | 25 | 40 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 12:58 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:59 | no | 0 | 39 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:25 | yes | 19 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 12:17 | yes | 23 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:20 | yes | 24 | 46 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:58 | yes | 4 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:36 | yes | 18 | 31 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
CyberArk read as CyberArk Identity
CyberArk (Identity Security) read as CyberArk Identity
ForgeRock read as ForgeRock Identity Platform
ForgeRock (now part of Ping Identity) read as ForgeRock Identity Platform
Google Workspace read as Google Cloud Identity
Google Workspace (Built-in Google Identity) read as Google Cloud Identity
Google Workspace (formerly G Suite) read as Google Cloud Identity
Google Workspace Identity read as Google Cloud Identity
Google Workspace SSO read as Google Cloud Identity
Microsoft Entra read as Microsoft Entra ID
Okta read as Okta Workforce Identity
Okta (Professional) read as Okta Workforce Identity
Okta Workforce read as Okta Workforce Identity
Ping read as Ping Identity
SailPoint read as SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
Unresolved, counted raw
Auth0 Organizations
Broadcom (formerly CA Technologies) Identity Manager
Duo SSO
Entrust Identity as a Service
Google Identity
Idira Identity
Microsoft Entra ID Advanced Enterprise Tiers (P2 or Suite Upgrades)
RSA IGA
StackOne
Thales SafeNet
YeshID
Zilla
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.