| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workforce identity and SSO | Identity and access | 23% | 2 of 44 | 32% | 72 | criticized challenger | ▼−6Since September 2026: 32% → 26%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Intelligent document processing | Data platform | 0% | 47 of 89 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Nanonets at 32% |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workforce identity | 32% | 26% | ▼−6Since September 2026: 32% → 26%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 2 of 44, unchanged |
| Document processing | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 47 of 89, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| Grok 4.20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“1. Okta Workforce Identity Cloud - Best for: Large enterprises needing a cloud-native, best-of-breed IAM platform with the broadest integration ecosystem.” Mistral Small · Workforce identity · comparative prompt · first choice
“Okta and Microsoft Entra lead in overall breadth and ecosystem depth... otherwise Okta for a vendor-neutral, deeply integrated solution.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Workforce identity · comparative prompt · first choice
“If you're app-agnostic with a diverse SaaS portfolio, Okta is the default leader with the largest integration catalog (18,000+ apps).” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Workforce identity · scale prompt · first choice
“Start with Okta if you're B2B with lots of SaaS (e.g., Salesforce, Slack)—it's the most cited leader for mid-market flexibility.” Grok 4.20 · Workforce identity · direct prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Okta is not recommended unless you have a SaaS portfolio of 50+ applications” Llama 4 Maverick · Workforce identity · budget prompt · hard negative
“Multiple high-profile breaches (2022 Lapsus$ attack, 2023 support system credential theft)... Mitigation: If you choose Okta, ensure rigorous tenant security hygiene” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Workforce identity · negative prompt · soft negative
“Okta has experienced several security issues... These incidents don't necessarily mean you should avoid Okta... but you should stay current with their security advisories” MiniMax M2.5 · Workforce identity · negative prompt · soft negative
“Other options like Okta start at around $6 per user per month and require a minimum annual commitment, which may not be ideal for very small teams.” Mistral Small · Workforce identity · budget prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 213 of the 233 answers that named Okta Workforce Identity and are not a share of its labels.
591 of the 672 domain citations in answers naming Okta Workforce Identity came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Podcast or video | 1,314 | 0 | 2026-05-27 | ||
| Blog | 1,303 | 6 | 2026-09-22 | Workforce identity | |
| Report or ebook | 1,069 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 292 | 1 | 2026-09-10 | ||
| News or press | 230 | undated | |||
| Case study | 172 | 0 | 2026-03-09 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 65 | 8 | 2026-09-22 | ||
| Conference or event | 47 | 0 | 2025-01-21 | ||
| Comparison | 35 | 5 | 2026-09-08 | ||
| Template or tool | 3 | 0 | 2024-04-12 |
Every page okta.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Okta Workforce Identity's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: okta.com, okta.com/pricing, okta.com/blog/topic/security, okta.com/solutions, okta.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Okta Workforce Identity's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Okta Workforce Identity, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Okta Workforce Identity by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
Okta Workforce Identity is among the products AI models recommend first in Workforce identity and SSO this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.