| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workforce identity and SSO | Identity and access | 20% | 3 of 44 | 12% | 41 | accepted challenger | ▲+5Since September 2026: 15% → 20%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Identity governance | Identity and access | 3% | 11 of 76 | 17% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Entra ID Governance at 25% | =heldSince September 2026: 3% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Intelligent document processing | Data platform | 2% | 16 of 89 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Nanonets at 32% | |
| Customer identity and access management | Identity and access | 0% | 48 of 70 | 33% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Frontegg at 21% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Non-human identity management | Identity and access | 0% | 73 of 128 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by JumpCloud at 14% | |
| Privileged access management | Identity and access | 0% | 32 of 73 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Delinea Secret Server at 37% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workforce identity | 15% | 20% | ▲+5Since September 2026: 15% → 20%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 3 of 44, unchanged |
| Document processing | 0% | 2% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. | New this edition | Rank 16 of 89, unchanged |
| CIAM | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 15 → 48 of 70 |
| IGA | 3% | 4% | =heldSince September 2026: 3% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 8 → 11 of 76 |
| NHI management | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 73 of 128, unchanged |
| PAM | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 32 of 73, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 7 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 7 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“the most practical workforce identity choice in the results is OneLogin (by One Identity), which is explicitly described as the budget-tier choice” Perplexity Sonar · Workforce identity · budget prompt · first choice
“OneLogin is a strong fit for mid-market companies that want enterprise-grade SSO and MFA without the implementation timeline of the largest suites.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Workforce identity · direct prompt · first choice
“OneLogin - A strong fit for mid-market companies that want enterprise-grade SSO and MFA without the implementation timeline of the largest suites.” Llama 4 Maverick · Workforce identity · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“If you want a single default recommendation for employee identity and SSO at a mid-sized B2B company, I would choose OneLogin.” Perplexity Sonar · Workforce identity · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“This is currently the highest-risk scenario for enterprises... your costs may skyrocket; if you are looking to buy, the long-term roadmap is opaque.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Workforce identity · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid OneLogin if you are a fast-growing enterprise with complex hybrid-cloud environments” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Workforce identity · negative prompt · hard negative
“It is recommended to avoid OneLogin for primary workforce identity use cases.” Mistral Small · Workforce identity · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid as a *primary* platform for complex workforce needs; better for SMBs with simple SSO/MFA requirements.” Grok 4.20 · Workforce identity · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 119 of the 131 answers that named OneLogin and are not a share of its labels.
422 of the 422 domain citations in answers naming OneLogin came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 253 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 111 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 107 | undated | |||
| Case study | 76 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 74 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 61 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 24 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 8 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 7 | undated | |||
| News or press | 6 | undated |
Every page onelogin.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What OneLogin's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: onelogin.com, onelogin.com/compliance, onelogin.com/product, onelogin.com/customers, onelogin.com/jp-ja/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when OneLogin's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as OneLogin, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for OneLogin by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
OneLogin is among the products AI models recommend first in Workforce identity and SSO this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.