Every category where a model named miniOrange for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Data loss prevention	Security operations	4%	7 of 84	0%	10	accepted challenger
Workforce identity and SSO	Identity and access	2%	7 of 48	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Entra ID at 36%
Multi-factor authentication	Identity and access	0%	26 of 78	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Cisco Duo at 42%
Privileged access management	Identity and access	0%	19 of 74	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by ManageEngine PAM360 at 21%
Customer identity and access management	Identity and access	0%	50 of 74	50%	2	under 10 labels · led by Auth0 at 22%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for miniOrange yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated miniOrange across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	2	0	2
Mistral Small	2	0	0	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	5	0	5
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1	3	0	5
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	1	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	2	0	4
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct12 labelsNone

Paraphrase8 labels2

Comparative14 labelsNone

Budget-constrained23 labels3

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative6 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative67 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“miniOrange - Best for SMBs and mid-market companies, SaaS teams, healthcare, finance, and legal organizations that want multi-channel coverage with a faster deployment path.” Llama 4 Maverick · DLP · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“For the most budget-conscious choice, miniOrange is frequently cited as the most flexible and affordable option” Mistral Small · Workforce identity · budget prompt · first choice

“CurrentWare and miniOrange are strong choices due to their scalability, ease of use, and value for money” Mistral Small · DLP · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“miniOrange is a flexible and affordable option for businesses that need a modular and customizable PAM solution” Claude Haiku 4.5 · PAM · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“it may be less established as a default SMB recommendation than LoginRadius in the sources here” Perplexity Sonar · CIAM · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as miniOrange, over the 67 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and miniOrange was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Microsoft Entra ID31 of 678Not in the top three

JumpCloud30 of 6716Not in the top three

OneLogin25 of 671Not in the top three

Okta22 of 671Not in the top three

CurrentWare19 of 675Not in the top three

Safetica17 of 672Not in the top three

Microsoft Purview DLP16 of 679Not in the top three

Netwrix Endpoint Protector13 of 670Not in the top three

Nightfall AI11 of 671Not in the top three

Cisco Duo9 of 676Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named miniOrange. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 66 of the 67 answers that named miniOrange and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

miniorange.comYour site34

startwithidentity.com34

learn.g2.com25

corma.io19

currentware.com19

gartner.com18

g2.com14

expertinsights.com13

consilien.com11

forcepoint.com10

163 of the 197 domain citations in answers naming miniOrange came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

startwithidentity.com/rankings/best-iam-for-smb29

miniorange.com/blog/top-data-loss-prevention-tools21

currentware.com/blog/best-data-loss-prevention-software19

learn.g2.com/best-data-loss-prevention-software18

corma.io/blog/top-10-iam-solutions-for-smbs-and-mid-size-companies-202617

startwithidentity.com/rankings/best-iam-platforms17

startwithidentity.com/articles/top-6-workforce-identity-platforms16

consilien.com/news/best-dlp-solutions-202611

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as miniOrange

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as miniOrange; a claim can dispute any of them.

JumpCloud/miniOrange 1MiniOrange CIAM 1Miniorange 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when miniOrange's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as miniOrange, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at miniorange.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.