Workforce identity and SSO for enterprise buyers
Asked as “workforce identity platform”, and as “single sign-on and identity provider for employees”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 59 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
49%
Clear leader
49Microsoft Entra ID44Okta Workforce Identity03Ping Identity03others
49% of first choices, clear leader.
Since September 2026↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Microsoft Entra ID (47%) replaces Okta Workforce Identity (53% then, 45% now), 2 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Microsoft Entra ID leads at 47%, replacing Okta Workforce Identity, which led at 53% and stands at 45% now: 2 points clear, inside the floor, so the swap reads as unsettled.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
JumpCloud48%Clear leader▼−1Since September 2026: 48% → 47%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-market
Microsoft Entra ID46%Clear leader▲+6Since September 2026: 36% → 42%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →EnterpriseMicrosoft Entra ID49%Clear leader↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Microsoft Entra ID (47%) replaces Okta Workforce Identity (53% then, 45% now), 2 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.This page
JumpCloud48%Clear leader▼−1Since September 2026: 48% → 47%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-marketMicrosoft Entra ID46%Clear leader▲+6Since September 2026: 36% → 42%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →EnterpriseMicrosoft Entra ID49%Clear leader↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Microsoft Entra ID (47%) replaces Okta Workforce Identity (53% then, 45% now), 2 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Microsoft Entra ID49%12%72endorsed leader=heldSince September 2026: 47% → 47%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.47% → 47%
Microsoft Entra ID49%12%72endorsed leader=heldSince September 2026: 47% → 47%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.47% → 47%02
Okta Workforce Identity44%19%79endorsed leader▼−8Since September 2026: 53% → 45%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.53% → 45%
Okta Workforce Identity44%19%79endorsed leader▼−8Since September 2026: 53% → 45%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.53% → 45%03
Ping Identity3%8%62accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 4%
Ping Identity3%8%62accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 4%04
OneLogin2%45%22criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
OneLogin2%45%22criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
09
ForgeRock Identity Platform0%35%17criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
ForgeRock Identity Platform0%35%17criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%08JumpCloud0%27%15criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
JumpCloud0%27%15criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%07
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud0%21%19accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud0%21%19accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%06
IBM Verify0%12%17accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
IBM Verify0%12%17accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%05
CyberArk Identity0%7%27accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
CyberArk Identity0%7%27accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to head
All six head-to-head pages: the top four products, each against each
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203040506070809Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Microsoft Entra ID49%
Microsoft Entra ID49%02Okta Workforce Identity44%
Okta Workforce Identity44%03Ping Identity3%
Ping Identity3%04OneLogin2%
OneLogin2%05CyberArk Identity0%
CyberArk Identity0%06IBM Verify0%
IBM Verify0%07SailPoint Identity Security Cloud0%
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud0%08JumpCloud0%
JumpCloud0%09ForgeRock Identity Platform0%
ForgeRock Identity Platform0%What they warned about
Six of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Okta Workforce Identity19%
15 of 79 labels negative · 10 of 14 models
“Okta Workforce Identity (High Security Risk & Vendor Fatigue)... Caution is warranted if you lack the internal IAM team to harden it” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Microsoft Entra ID12%
9 of 72 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“one comparison explicitly says to avoid it as the primary platform unless the macOS or Linux population is small” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt
OneLogin45%
10 of 22 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Flagged for high negative sentiment (50% negative labels), with recommendations to avoid using it as a primary workforce identity provider” Mistral Small, negative prompt
ForgeRock Identity Platform35%
6 of 17 labels negative · 6 of 14 models
“extremely cautious about organizations heavily reliant on Ping Identity and ForgeRock due to their recent merger” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
75 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1121 links across 257 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 51 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
43 answers · 67 citations · 11 models
40 answers · 67 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Siit32 answers · 41 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Okta32 answers · 37 citations · 11 models
22 answers · 25 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Microsoft20 answers · 31 citations · 11 models
20 answers · 23 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Ping Identity20 answers · 23 citations · 10 models
vendor site · SSOJet18 answers · 25 citations · 9 models
15 answers · 19 citations · 8 models
vendor site · WorkOS14 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
vendor site · MojoAuth14 answers · 15 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
25 answers · 8 models
18 answers · 8 models
16 answers · 8 models
16 answers · 8 models
16 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 9 models
12 answers · 8 models
12 answers · 7 models
12 answers · 6 models
12 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best workforce identity platform”, “workforce identity platform”, “workforce identity platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft parent site Microsoft Entra ID 49% | 49% | 480 | 2,240,000 | 403,136 | ||||
| Okta Workforce Identity okta.com | 44% | 213 | 390 | 8 | 1,959,740 | 118 | 2 | |
| Ping pingidentity.com Ping Identity 3%, ForgeRock Identity Platform 0% | 3% | 251 | 12,100 | 249 | 73,959 company | $30 | 55 | |
| Saviynt saviynt.com | 2% | 25 | 9,900 | 285 | 14,800 | $71 | 34 | 1 |
| OneLogin onelogin.com | 2% | 119 | 60,500 | 562 | 315,519 | 0 | ||
| CyberArk cyberark.com CyberArk Identity 0% | 0% | 51 | 22,200 | 1,253 | 147,793 company | $62 | 0 | |
| IBM parent site IBM Verify 0% | 0% | 79 | 201,000 | 34,098 | ||||
| SailPoint Identity Security Cloud sailpoint.com | 0% | 199 | 320 | 3 | 58,881 | 46 | ||
| JumpCloud jumpcloud.com | 0% | 321 | 12,100 | 244 | 108,479 | $8,612 | 80 | |
| PingOne for Workforce | 0% |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 23 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (okta.com, startwithidentity.com). The first result for “best workforce identity platform” is thectoclub.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best workforce identity platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which single sign-on and identity provider for employees would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade workforce identity platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best workforce identity platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a workforce identity platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which workforce identity platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityChangedMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityOkta Workforce Identityno first choicenothing named
Six alternatives
Auth0, Frontegg, JumpCloud, Microsoft Entra ID, SSOJet, WorkOSThree alternatives
JumpCloud, Keycloak, Ping IdentityTwo alternatives
ForgeRock Identity Platform, Ping IdentityOne alternative
Ping IdentityGPT-5.4 miniMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra IDChangedMicrosoft Entra ID, Microsoft Entra ID Governance, Okta Workforce IdentityOneLoginagainst: Okta Workforce Identityno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Ping Identity, SailPoint Identity Security CloudTwo alternatives
Okta Workforce Identity, PingOne for WorkforceFour alternatives
ForgeRock Identity Platform, OneLogin Workforce IAM, PingOne for Workforce, SailPoint Identity Security CloudTwo alternatives
Microsoft Entra Suite, PingOne for WorkforceGemini 3.5 FlashMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityHeldMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra ID, Ping Identityagainst: Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identityagainst: CA SiteMinder / Broadcom VIP, ForgeRock Identity Platform, JumpCloud, Keycloak, Okta Workforce Identity, OneLogin, Oracle Access Manager, Rippling, Shibboleth
Two alternatives
CyberArk Identity, Ping IdentityOne alternative
Ping IdentityThree alternatives
CyberArk Identity, IBM Verify, Ping IdentityOne alternative
Ping IdentityPerplexity SonarOkta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityChangedOkta Workforce IdentityPing Identityno first choiceagainst: Google Cloud Identity, JumpCloud, Microsoft Entra ID, Scalefusion
Two alternatives
CyberArk Identity, Microsoft Entra IDFour alternatives
CyberArk Identity, Microsoft Entra ID, One Identity, Ping IdentityTwo alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityGrok 4.1 FastMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identityagainst: ForgeRock Identity Platform, IBM VerifyOkta Workforce IdentityChangedMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra IDno first choiceagainst: Arculix, JumpCloud, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, Omada Identity, One Identity
Two alternatives
CyberArk Identity, Ping IdentityThree alternatives
Google Cloud Identity, Microsoft Entra ID, Ping IdentityThree alternatives
CyberArk Identity, IBM Verify, Ping IdentityThree alternatives
Okta Workforce Identity, OneLogin, Ping IdentityMistral SmallOkta Workforce IdentityOkta Workforce IdentityHeldOkta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra IDagainst: Okta Workforce Identityno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, OneLogin, Ping Identity
Two alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Ping IdentityTwo alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Ping IdentityFive alternatives
CyberArk Identity, IBM Verify, JumpCloud, Microsoft Entra ID, Ping IdentityDeepSeek V4 FlashOkta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra IDChangedagainst: Ping IdentityMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identityagainst: ForgeRock Identity PlatformMicrosoft Entra IDagainst: Okta Workforce Identity, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, SaviyntMicrosoft Entra IDagainst: OneLoginagainst: Amazon Cognito, Auth0, CA Identity Manager, CyberArk Identity, IBM Verify, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, OneLogin, Oracle Identity Governance, Ping Identity, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
Two alternatives
CyberArk Identity, Microsoft Entra IDOne alternative
Okta Workforce IdentityThree alternatives
CyberArk Identity, IBM Verify, Ping IdentityOne alternative
Ping IdentityTwo alternatives
Okta Workforce Identity, Ping IdentityLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceOkta Workforce IdentityChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceagainst: ForgeRock Identity Platform, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, OneLogin, Ping Identity
Two alternatives
SSOJet, WorkOSQwen 3.7 FlashMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityHeldMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra IDSaviyntagainst: Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, SailPoint Identity Security Cloudagainst: Cisco Duo, CyberArk Identity, Okta Workforce Identity, OneLogin, Windows Server Active Directory
Three alternatives
ForgeRock Identity Platform, IBM Verify, Ping IdentityTwo alternatives
CyberArk Identity, Ping IdentityTwo alternatives
Fortra, Okta Workforce IdentityThree alternatives
CyberArk Identity, OneAccess, Ping IdentityKimi K2Microsoft Entra IDMicrosoft Entra IDHeldOkta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra IDagainst: Auth0, ForgeRock Identity Platform, Okta Workforce Identity, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, SaviyntMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identityagainst: Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity
Three alternatives
CyberArk Identity, Okta Workforce Identity, Ping IdentityTwo alternatives
Okta Workforce Identity, Ping IdentityThree alternatives
CyberArk Identity, Microsoft Entra ID, Ping IdentityOne alternative
Ping IdentityOne alternative
Ping IdentityGLM 4.7 FlashXOkta Workforce IdentityOkta Workforce IdentityHeldOkta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra IDno first choiceagainst: Auth0, OneLogin, miniOrange
Four alternatives
IBM Verify, Microsoft Entra ID, OneLogin, Ping IdentityTwo alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Ping IdentityFive alternatives
CyberArk Identity, JumpCloud Device & Identity Management, Microsoft Entra ID, OneLogin, Ping IdentityTwo alternatives
Okta Workforce Identity, Ping IdentityMiniMax M2.5Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityHeldagainst: OneLoginMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityOkta Workforce Identityagainst: Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, Ping Identity / ForgeRock
Three alternatives
CyberArk Identity, Ping Identity, SailPoint Identity Security CloudTwo alternatives
ForgeRock Identity Platform, Ping IdentityTwo alternatives
CyberArk Identity, Ping IdentityOne alternative
LumosTwo alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Ping IdentityGPT-6 LunaOkta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra IDChangedMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra IDno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Entra ID Governance, SAP Identity Management
Two alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Ping IdentityOne alternative
Okta Workforce IdentityFive alternatives
CyberArk Identity, Google Cloud Identity, IBM Verify, JumpCloud, Ping IdentityOne alternative
Okta Workforce IdentityMuse Glimmer 30BMicrosoft Entra IDOkta Workforce IdentityChangedMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identityagainst: JumpCloud, OneLoginMicrosoft Entra IDagainst: Auth0no first choiceagainst: ForgeRock Identity Platform, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, OneLogin, Ping Identity
One alternative
Okta Workforce IdentityTwo alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Ping IdentityTwo alternatives
CyberArk Identity, Ping IdentityTwo alternatives
Okta Workforce Identity, Ping IdentityBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:02 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:32 | yes | 4 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:13 | yes | 18 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 13:01 | yes | 17 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 07:57 | yes | 24 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 12:12 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 12:34 | yes | 24 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:15 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 12:47 | yes | 5 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:50 | yes | 20 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 13:13 | yes | 15 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:33 | yes | 10 | 61 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:09 | yes | 4 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 13:34 | yes | 15 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:57 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:48 | yes | 6 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:47 | yes | 10 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 13:46 | yes | 17 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:07 | yes | 25 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:46 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:24 | yes | 25 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:27 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:30 | no | 0 | 34 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:56 | yes | 9 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 13:32 | yes | 25 | 66 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 12:27 | no | 0 | 43 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 13:05 | yes | 2 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 12:53 | yes | 14 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 12:55 | yes | 17 | 10 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:04 | yes | 8 | 12 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:51 | yes | 15 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:38 | yes | 19 | 4 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:35 | yes | 24 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:55 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:02 | yes | 23 | 41 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 13:26 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 13:38 | yes | 25 | 55 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 07:39 | yes | 19 | 26 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:22 | yes | 24 | 48 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 13:00 | yes | 15 | 34 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:35 | yes | 8 | 32 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:19 | yes | 23 | 36 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:46 | yes | 17 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 07:45 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:17 | yes | 14 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:18 | yes | 18 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 13:12 | yes | 21 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 12:29 | yes | 19 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:18 | yes | 25 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:00 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:52 | no | 0 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:30 | yes | 25 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:11 | yes | 24 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:44 | yes | 5 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:19 | yes | 2 | 13 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:40 | yes | 14 | 23 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:33 | yes | 18 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:54 | yes | 2 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:39 | no | 0 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 07:59 | yes | 13 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:14 | yes | 20 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:44 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:17 | yes | 24 | 43 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 07:54 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:52 | no | 0 | 42 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:06 | yes | 25 | 48 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:18 | yes | 15 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:12 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 07:46 | yes | 4 | 39 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:11 | yes | 14 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:42 | yes | 18 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:19 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:47 | yes | 20 | 34 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 07:50 | yes | 21 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:57 | yes | 25 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 07:56 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 12:12 | yes | 25 | 60 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 07:36 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:13 | yes | 14 | 35 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:33 | yes | 25 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 12:00 | yes | 24 | 82 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 12:40 | yes | 22 | 37 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:26 | yes | 3 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:45 | yes | 24 | 30 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
CyberArk read as CyberArk Identity
CyberArk (Idira) read as CyberArk Identity
ForgeRock read as ForgeRock Identity Platform
IBM read as IBM Verify
Microsoft Entra read as Microsoft Entra ID
Okta read as Okta Workforce Identity
Okta Identity Cloud read as Okta Workforce Identity
Okta Workforce read as Okta Workforce Identity
Ping read as Ping Identity
SailPoint read as SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
Unresolved, counted raw
Active Directory
Arculix
CA SiteMinder / Broadcom VIP
JumpCloud Device & Identity Management
Microsoft Entra Suite
OneAccess (Netwrix)
OneLogin Workforce IAM
Shibboleth
Windows Server Active Directory
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.