Every category where a model named CyberArk Identity for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Workforce identity and SSO	Identity and access	0%	8 of 48	13%	23	accepted challenger
Business password managers	Identity and access	0%	20 of 35	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Bitwarden at 49%
Secrets management	Identity and access	0%	17 of 40	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Doppler at 33%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for CyberArk Identity yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated CyberArk Identity across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	2	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	2	2	0	4
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	1	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	2	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1	1	3
Kimi K2	1	1	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	1	1	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct8 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative23 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained10 labelsNone

Negative16 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative58 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose CyberArk if your absolute priority is locking down high-privilege access and bridging standard employee SSO with PAM.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Workforce identity · comparative prompt · alternative

“CyberArk remains an established leader in privileged access, particularly in large, highly regulated enterprises” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Workforce identity · comparative prompt · alternative

“Native PAM, endpoint trust, top scores in security/innovation | Less emphasis on broad SSO” Grok 4.1 Fast · Workforce identity · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best for: Security-conscious buyers, organizations with strong PAM requirements” MiniMax M2.5 · Workforce identity · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“not the cleanest choice if your primary need is standard workforce SSO/lifecycle management” Perplexity Sonar · Workforce identity · negative prompt · soft negative

“Users report limitations in dashboard capabilities and integration breadth.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Workforce identity · negative prompt · soft negative

“be cautious about buying *all* your workforce identity needs from CyberArk” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Workforce identity · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CyberArk Identity, over the 58 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CyberArk Identity was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Microsoft Entra ID53 of 5826Not in the top three

Ping Identity46 of 581Not in the top three

Okta Workforce Identity34 of 5823Not in the top three

JumpCloud26 of 584Not in the top three

ForgeRock20 of 580Not in the top three

IBM Verify20 of 580Not in the top three

SailPoint20 of 580Not in the top three

Okta19 of 587Not in the top three

OneLogin15 of 581Not in the top three

Saviynt8 of 580Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CyberArk Identity. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 52 of the 58 answers that named CyberArk Identity and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

startwithidentity.com42

siit.io24

forrester.com20

okta.com18

securityboulevard.com15

wifitalents.com14

decryptiondigest.com13

majorkeytech.com13

microsoft.com12

nhimg.org12

183 of the 183 domain citations in answers naming CyberArk Identity came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

startwithidentity.com/articles/top-6-workforce-identity-platforms35

startwithidentity.com/rankings/best-iam-platforms31

siit.io/blog/best-iam-tools20

forrester.com/blogs/announcing-the-forrester-wave-workforce-identity-platforms-q1-202417

securityboulevard.com/2025/12/top-12-identity-and-access-management-platforms13

wifitalents.com/best/identity-software12

cybersecurityessential.com/tools/iam-zero-trust/okta-entra-ping-zero-trust-iam10

guideflow.com/blog/identity-access-management-software10

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as CyberArk Identity

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as CyberArk Identity; a claim can dispute any of them.

CyberArk 10CyberArk Workforce Identity 8CyberArk (Idira) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CyberArk Identity's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CyberArk Identity, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at cyberark.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.