Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 35 → 46 of 51
1 category · RankedForgeRock Identity Platform
37Judge labels
0First choices
14Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Workforce identity for mid-market buyers
Rank 9 of 44 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 21% of its 14 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of ForgeRock Identity Platform →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business48 of 54
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market9 of 44
0%14 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise13 of 48
0%17 labels
criticized challenger
In workforce identity · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named ForgeRock Identity Platform for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workforce identity and SSO | Identity and access | 0% | 9 of 44 | 21% | 14 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, ForgeRock Identity Platform held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Workforce identity · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 11 → 9 of 38
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 7 → 13 of 46
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workforce identity | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 11 → 9 of 44 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated ForgeRock Identity Platform across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated ForgeRock Identity Platform across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative15 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative14 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative37 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Hybrid/on-prem requirements or strict data residency? → Ping Identity or ForgeRock are strong.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Workforce identity · comparative prompt · alternative
“Cited alongside Ping as the option for "high-assurance and customization"” Muse Glimmer 30B · Workforce identity · comparative prompt · alternative
“Ping or ForgeRock for high-assurance and customization” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Workforce identity · comparative prompt · alternative
“ForgeRock (strong on-prem/hybrid support)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Workforce identity · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“extremely cautious about organizations heavily reliant on these platforms due to their recent merger, which may introduce instability” Mistral Small · Workforce identity · negative prompt · soft negative
“ForgeRock is often overkill and operationally expensive to manage without a full-time Identity Engineering team.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Workforce identity · negative prompt · soft negative
“Be cautious if you are looking for long-term stability without migration headaches.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Workforce identity · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ForgeRock Identity Platform, over the 37 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ForgeRock Identity Platform was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ForgeRock Identity Platform, over the 37 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ForgeRock Identity Platform was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ForgeRock Identity Platform. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 33 of the 37 answers that named ForgeRock Identity Platform and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
startwithidentity.com27
securityboulevard.com21
expertinsights.com13
forrester.com13
it-ai-index.com11
okta.com10
guptadeepak.com9
loginradius.com9
siit.io8
ssojet.com8
129 of the 129 domain citations in answers naming ForgeRock Identity Platform came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
pingidentity.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, ForgeRock Identity Platform takes 0% of first choices and Microsoft Entra ID takes 46%.ShowHide
Search and answers
pingidentity.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, ForgeRock Identity Platform takes 0% of first choices and Microsoft Entra ID takes 46%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “workforce identity platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “workforce identity platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 20 a month (“forgerock identity platform”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 73,959 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 9,378 · 940 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 10,341
- Paid Google search
- 2 searches its ads show for, about 2 clicks and $30 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 9 of 44 in workforce identity
Segment leader
46%
Microsoft Entra ID
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 37 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 33 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on pingidentity.com
10,010
subdomains included
Content
1,510
counted in the table below
Documentation
6,101
Product · Integration
65 · 24
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Podcast or video | 482 | undated | MFA, CIAM | ||
| Blog | 339 | 8 | 2026-09-23 | MFA, CIAM | |
| Report or ebook | 251 | undated | CIAM, MFA | ||
| News or press | 217 | undated | CIAM, IGA | ||
| Case study | 92 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 57 | 0 | 2026-01-07 | CIAM, PAM | |
| Template or tool | 31 | undated | CIAM | ||
| Conference or event | 21 | 0 | 2025-03-21 | ||
| Comparison | 11 | 0 | 2025-02-12 | MFA | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 9 | 0 | 2026-03-20 | CIAM |
Most recent
- 2026-09-23September 2026 product updates blog
- 2026-09-23Ai agent security incidents summer 2026 blog
- 2026-09-18Consumer agents enterprise identity blog
- 2026-09-17Ai agent standards security blog
- 2026-09-15Identity gateway post quantum cryptography blog
- 2026-08-26August 2026 product updates blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page pingidentity.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name MFA (36); 0 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as ForgeRock Identity Platform
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ForgeRock Identity Platform; a claim can dispute any of them.
ForgeRock 13Ping Identity & ForgeRock 1
Follow ForgeRock Identity Platform
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
ForgeRock Identity Platform is its own company.ShowHide
The company
ForgeRock Identity Platform is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Free plan or trial
- Try Ping pingidentity.com
- Integrations claimed
- 6500 pingidentity.com
- Certifications
- FedRAMP
- Customers named
- State of ConnecticutCoast CapitalPhilipsBest BuyThe BBC
- Not stated on the pages read
- Positioning, who it is for, price, starting price, hosting
What ForgeRock Identity Platform's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: pingidentity.com, pingidentity.com/en/platform.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ForgeRock Identity Platform's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ForgeRock Identity Platform, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ForgeRock Identity Platform by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where ForgeRock Identity Platform is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name ForgeRock Identity Platform, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.