IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › Ping Workforce360 · September 2026 Edition

Ping · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Ping Workforce360

3Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

2 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Ping Workforce360 was named 2 times in Workforce identity, where Microsoft Entra ID led with 36%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market16 of 48

under the label threshold

Enterprise20 of 55

under the label threshold

In workforce identity · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Ping Workforce360 for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Workforce identity and SSO	Identity and access	0%	16 of 48	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Entra ID at 36%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Ping Workforce360 yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Ping Workforce360 across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Ping if you have complex hybrid environments or strict regulatory requirements” Kimi K2 · Workforce identity · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Ping Workforce360, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Ping Workforce360 was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

CyberArk Identity3 of 30Not in the top three

IBM Verify3 of 30Not in the top three

Microsoft Entra ID3 of 30Not in the top three

Okta Workforce Identity2 of 31Not in the top three

ForgeRock2 of 30Not in the top three

Okta1 of 31Not in the top three

JumpCloud1 of 30Not in the top three

Ping Identity1 of 30Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Ping Workforce360. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named Ping Workforce360 and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

startwithidentity.com3

securityboulevard.com2

wifitalents.com2

cyber-tools.net1

cybersecurityessential.com1

cybervendorguide.com1

decryptiondigest.com1

forrester.com1

majorkeytech.com1

okta.com1

Fourteen of the fourteen domain citations in answers naming Ping Workforce360 came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

startwithidentity.com/articles/top-6-workforce-identity-platforms3

securityboulevard.com/2025/12/top-12-identity-and-access-management-platforms2

startwithidentity.com/rankings/best-iam-platforms2

wifitalents.com/best/identity-software2

cyber-tools.net/blog/iam-tools-compared-okta-azure-ad-ping-cyberark-20261

cybersecurityessential.com/tools/iam-zero-trust/okta-entra-ping-zero-trust-iam1

cybervendorguide.com/guides/identity-access-management1

decryptiondigest.com/blog/workforce-identity-zero-trust-comparison1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Ping Workforce360

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Ping Workforce360; a claim can dispute any of them.

Ping Identity / Ping Workforce360 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Ping Workforce360's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Ping Workforce360, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at ping.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.