Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 44 → 30 of 46
2 categories · Named, not rankedAuth0/Okta Customer Identity Cloud
7Judge labels
0First choices
3Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Auth0/Okta Customer Identity Cloud was named 3 times in CIAM and 1 other category, where Frontegg led with 21%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business35 of 51
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market20 of 70
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise66 of 69
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In ciam · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Auth0/Okta Customer Identity Cloud for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Customer identity and access management | Identity and access | 0% | 20 of 70 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Frontegg at 21% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Workforce identity and SSO | Identity and access | 0% | 17 of 44 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Entra ID at 46% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Auth0/Okta Customer Identity Cloud held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · CIAM · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 20 → 25 of 61
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 35 → 59 of 62
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIAM | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 20 of 70, unchanged |
| Workforce identity | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 17 of 44, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Auth0/Okta Customer Identity Cloud across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Auth0/Okta Customer Identity Cloud across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative3 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best overall / developer benchmark with a score of 9.2 in a 2026 ranking; "Auth0 (Okta) still the developer benchmark"” Muse Glimmer 30B · CIAM · comparative prompt · first choice
“Best if you want the deepest developer ecosystem and broadest CIAM maturity: Auth0 / Okta Customer Identity Cloud” GPT-5.4 mini · CIAM · direct prompt · alternative
“Auth0 / Okta Customer Identity Cloud (developer-first, multi-tenant)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Workforce identity · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Auth0/Okta Customer Identity Cloud, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Auth0/Okta Customer Identity Cloud was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Auth0/Okta Customer Identity Cloud, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Auth0/Okta Customer Identity Cloud was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Auth0/Okta Customer Identity Cloud. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 7 answers that named Auth0/Okta Customer Identity Cloud and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
frontegg.com3
fusionauth.io3
g2.com3
guptadeepak.com3
loginradius.com3
okta.com3
securityboulevard.com3
authx.com2
clerk.com2
cybersecuritynews.com2
Twenty-seven of the twenty-seven domain citations in answers naming Auth0/Okta Customer Identity Cloud came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
auth0.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Auth0/Okta Customer Identity Cloud takes 0% of first choices and Frontegg takes 21%.ShowHide
Search and answers
auth0.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Auth0/Okta Customer Identity Cloud takes 0% of first choices and Frontegg takes 21%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “customer identity platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “customer identity platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Organic visits to its site
- about 170,673 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 20,005 · 2,025 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 28,328
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 20 of 70 in CIAM
Segment leader
21%
Frontegg
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 7 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 7 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on auth0.com
11,776
subdomains included
Content
3,659
counted in the table below
Documentation
6,822
Product · Integration
21 · 4
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 2,431 | 10 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Report or ebook | 483 | undated | |||
| Case study | 230 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 145 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 119 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 83 | undated | |||
| News or press | 61 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 40 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 39 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 28 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Securing agentic commerce using auth0 universal commerce protocol ucp blog
- 2026-09-28Auth0 for chatgpt build manage identity blog
- 2026-09-25Stop building mfa from scratch blog
- 2026-09-22Confused deputy the old bug that ai agents keep reintroducing blog
- 2026-09-21Building secure ai agents microsoft agent framework auth0 part 4 human in the loop approval blog
- 2026-09-18Auth0 identity conversion suite early access blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page auth0.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Auth0/Okta Customer Identity Cloud
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Auth0/Okta Customer Identity Cloud; a claim can dispute any of them.
Auth0 / Okta Customer Identity Cloud 3
Follow Auth0/Okta Customer Identity Cloud
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Auth0/Okta Customer Identity Cloud is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Auth0/Okta Customer Identity Cloud is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- an easy-to-implement, scalable, and adaptable authentication and authorization platform
- For
- developers and enterprises
- Price stated
- Start building for free auth0.com
- Starting price
- 0 auth0.com
- Free plan or trial
- Start building for free auth0.com
- Integrations claimed
- 30 auth0.com
- Certifications
- Compliance CertificationsHIPAA BAA & PCIFAPI certified Security ProfileC5CISA: Secure-by-Design PledgeCSA STAR Level 1CSA STAR Level 2CSA Trusted Cloud Provider
- Customers named
- McLarenArdy NaghshinehSiemensJersey Mike'sCLAASRecidivizNHS Leadership AcademyDunelm
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What Auth0/Okta Customer Identity Cloud's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: auth0.com, auth0.com/pricing, auth0.com/security, auth0.com/platform, auth0.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Auth0/Okta Customer Identity Cloud's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Auth0/Okta Customer Identity Cloud, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Auth0/Okta Customer Identity Cloud by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Auth0/Okta Customer Identity Cloud is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Auth0/Okta Customer Identity Cloud, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.