IT AI Index

Index › Products › Palo Alto Networks Enterprise DLP · October 2026 Edition

Palo Alto Networks · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Palo Alto Networks Enterprise DLP

6Judge labels

0First choices

3Negative labels

4 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Palo Alto Networks Enterprise DLP was named 2 times in DLP, where Microsoft Purview DLP led with 46%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business64 of 82

under the label threshold

Mid-market74 of 89

under the label threshold

Enterprise28 of 60

under the label threshold

In dlp · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Palo Alto Networks Enterprise DLP for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Data loss prevention	Security operations	0%	74 of 89	50%	2	under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Purview DLP at 46%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Palo Alto Networks Enterprise DLP held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · DLP · by segment

Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 63 of 77, unchanged

Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 59 → 74 of 80

Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 2% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 8 → 27 of 55

All categories · Mid-market

Category	September 2026	Now	Change	Reading	Rank
DLP	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 59 → 74 of 89

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Palo Alto Networks Enterprise DLP across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.20	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	1	0	1
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Uses a cloud-based DLP service across Palo Alto enforcement points.” GPT-6 Luna · DLP · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Ecosystem lock-in... Expensive licensing... Performance overhead” Kimi K2 · DLP · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Palo Alto Networks Enterprise DLP, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Palo Alto Networks Enterprise DLP was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Microsoft Purview DLP5 of 62Not among the top eight

Forcepoint DLP4 of 60Not among the top eight

Symantec Data Loss Prevention4 of 60Not among the top eight

Fortra DLP3 of 60Not among the top eight

Netskope DLP3 of 60Not among the top eight

Proofpoint Enterprise DLP3 of 60Not among the top eight

Trellix DLP3 of 60Not among the top eight

Zscaler Internet Access2 of 60Not among the top eight

Cyberhaven1 of 60Not among the top eight

Digital Guardian1 of 60Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Palo Alto Networks Enterprise DLP. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 6 answers that named Palo Alto Networks Enterprise DLP and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

forcepoint.com4

cyberhaven.com3

docs.paloaltonetworks.comYour site3

learn.microsoft.com3

netskope.com3

proofpoint.com3

venn.com3

aimultiple.com2

comparitech.com2

docs.broadcom.com2

Twenty-five of the twenty-eight domain citations in answers naming Palo Alto Networks Enterprise DLP came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

forcepoint.com/product/dlp-data-loss-prevention3

netskope.com/products/data-loss-prevention3

venn.com/learn/dlp/dlp-software3

aimultiple.com/dlp-software2

comparitech.com/data-privacy-management/data-loss-prevention-tools-software2

cyberhaven.com/blog/top-dlp-solutions2

docs.broadcom.com/doc/data-loss-prevention-family-en2

docs.paloaltonetworks.com/prisma-browser/integrations/first-party-integrations/enterprise-2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Palo Alto Networks Enterprise DLP

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Palo Alto Networks Enterprise DLP; a claim can dispute any of them.

Palo Alto Enterprise DLP 1

Follow Palo Alto Networks Enterprise DLP

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Palo Alto Networks is the company behind Palo Alto Networks Enterprise DLP.

ShowHide

On record

Company records

Also from Palo Alto Networks: Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, Palo Alto Networks DLP, Palo Alto Networks DNS Security, Palo Alto Networks GlobalProtect, Palo Alto Networks Industrial OT and 21 more

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Review the proximity keywords and other important information for predefined data patterns included with Enterprise Data Loss Prevention (E-DLP).
docs.paloaltonetworks.com/enterprise-dlp/reference
For: data security administrators
docs.paloaltonetworks.com/enterprise-dlp/getting-started
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers

What Palo Alto Networks Enterprise DLP's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: unit42.paloaltonetworks.com/tag/enterprise-dlp, docs.paloaltonetworks.com/enterprise-dlp/reference, docs.paloaltonetworks.com/enterprise-dlp/release-notes, docs.paloaltonetworks.com/enterprise-dlp/administration, docs.paloaltonetworks.com/enterprise-dlp/getting-started. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Palo Alto Networks Enterprise DLP's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Palo Alto Networks Enterprise DLP, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Palo Alto Networks Enterprise DLP by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Palo Alto Networks Enterprise DLP is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Palo Alto Networks Enterprise DLP, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.