IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR · September 2026 Edition

Palo Alto Networks · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR

6Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

6 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR was named 5 times in Threat intel, where NordStellar led with 13%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business108 of 122

under the label threshold

Mid-market27 of 128

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In threat intel · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Threat intelligence platforms	Security operations	0%	27 of 128	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by NordStellar at 13%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative4 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Combines a high-fidelity intelligence repository (backed by Unit 42 research) with automation/playbooks.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Threat intel · comparative prompt · alternative

“their SOAR product includes a native TIP ... this is often the most efficient choice” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Threat intel · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Recorded Future5 of 62Not in the top three

ThreatConnect5 of 61Not in the top three

Anomali ThreatStream5 of 60Not in the top three

Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence4 of 60Not in the top three

CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence / Adversary Intelligence3 of 60Not in the top three

Cyble Vision3 of 60Not in the top three

Flashpoint3 of 60Not in the top three

OpenCTI3 of 60Not in the top three

Cyware2 of 60Not in the top three

Google Threat Intelligence2 of 60Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 6 answers that named Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

analyticsinsight.net4

cyware.com4

devopsschool.com4

securityboulevard.com4

csoonline.com2

cyble.com2

decryptiondigest.com2

esecurityplanet.com2

b2breviews.com1

ciopages.com1

Twenty-six of the twenty-six domain citations in answers naming Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

analyticsinsight.net/cybersecurity/best-threat-intelligence-platforms4

cyware.com/blog/top-threat-intelligence-platforms-and-solutions4

devopsschool.com/blog/top-10-threat-intelligence-tools-globally4

securityboulevard.com/2024/10/top-7-threat-intelligence-platforms-for-20244

csoonline.com/article/3984720/threat-intelligence-platform-buyers-guide-how-to-pick-the-be2

cyble.com/knowledge-hub/top-best-threat-intelligence-platforms2

esecurityplanet.com/products/threat-intelligence-platforms2

analyticsinsight.net/amp/story/cybersecurity/10-best-threat-intelligence-platforms-in-20261

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR; a claim can dispute any of them.

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR (now XSIAM) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at palo.ai is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.