IT AI Index
Index Vendors › Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR · September 2026 Edition
Palo Alto Networks · 4 categories · Ranked

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR

213Judge labels
7First choices
49Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
4Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
15% in XDR for enterprise buyers
Rank 13 of 61 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 21% of its 29 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
In xdr · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Extended detection and responseSecurity operations0%13 of 6121%29accepted challenger
Endpoint detection and responseSecurity operations0%12 of 5411%19accepted challenger
Endpoint protectionIT operations and endpoint0%19 of 990%14accepted challenger
Vulnerability management platformsSecurity operations0%71 of 80100%1under 10 labels · led by Rapid7 InsightVM at 45%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500202
GPT-5.4 mini03014
Gemini 3.5 Flash02114
Perplexity Sonar01203
Grok 4.1 Fast153110
Mistral Small10506
DeepSeek V4 Flash13228
Llama 4 Maverick00404
Qwen 3.7 Flash13116
Kimi K211103
GLM 4.7 FlashX12126
MiniMax M2.501517

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct38 labels3
Paraphrase25 labels4
Comparative68 labels11not counted in share
Budget-constrained12 labelsNone
Scale-constrained31 labelsNone
Negative39 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative213 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 18 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“### 1. Palo Alto Cortex XDR - Best for: Native correlation and enterprise security needs ... Score: 8.8/10 (2026 rankings)” Kimi K2 · XDR · comparative prompt · first choice
“If you need the absolute best detection and have the budget, CrowdStrike or Palo Alto Cortex XDR are the top picks.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · XDR · comparative prompt · first choice
“Palo Alto Cortex XDR – often rated #1 overall for correlation quality and data coverage” DeepSeek V4 Flash · XDR · comparative prompt · first choice
“Palo Alto and CrowdStrike lead in AI-driven detection and automation.” Mistral Small · XDR · comparative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Complex policy tuning/detections leading to high false positives/noise (requires expertise), steep learning curve ... aggressive pricing” Grok 4.1 Fast · XDR · negative prompt · soft negative
“Robust platform, but multiple security advisories and documented bypasses mean you must: Keep agents and content updates current.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · EDR · negative prompt · soft negative
“Major "Native" XDR vendors (such as Palo Alto Cortex, Microsoft Defender, and CrowdStrike)... Why to be cautious” Qwen 3.7 Flash · XDR · negative prompt · soft negative
“is good, but it's usually positioned more as an enterprise/advanced option than the cheapest choice” GPT-5.4 mini · XDR · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR, over the 213 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
SentinelOne Singularity152 of 21317Not in the top three
CrowdStrike Falcon121 of 21355Not in the top three
Microsoft Defender XDR99 of 21331Not in the top three
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint86 of 21320Not in the top three
Sophos Intercept X65 of 2130Not in the top three
Trend Vision One47 of 2130Not in the top three
Bitdefender GravityZone40 of 2132Not in the top three
CrowdStrike Falcon XDR36 of 2136Not in the top three
Stellar Cyber35 of 2132Not in the top three
Cisco XDR30 of 2130Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 175 of the 213 answers that named Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gbhackers.com122
cybersecuritynews.com91
paloaltonetworks.com85
cyberpress.org82
decryptiondigest.com68
gartner.com64
sentinelone.com46
guideflow.com44
microsoft.com37
esecurityplanet.com36

675 of the 675 domain citations in answers naming Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR; a claim can dispute any of them.
Palo Alto Cortex XDR 33Cortex XDR 2Palo Alto Cortex 2Cortex 1Palo Alto 1Palo Alto Cortex XDR (with EDR) 1Palo Alto Networks 1Palo Alto Networks Cortex 1Palo Alto Networks Cortex / Cortex XDR 1Palo Alto/Cortex 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at palo.ai is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack