| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Extended detection and response | Security operations | 0% | 13 of 61 | 21% | 29 | accepted challenger |
| Endpoint detection and response | Security operations | 0% | 12 of 54 | 11% | 19 | accepted challenger |
| Endpoint protection | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 19 of 99 | 0% | 14 | accepted challenger |
| Vulnerability management platforms | Security operations | 0% | 71 of 80 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Rapid7 InsightVM at 45% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 10 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 8 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 7 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“### 1. Palo Alto Cortex XDR - Best for: Native correlation and enterprise security needs ... Score: 8.8/10 (2026 rankings)” Kimi K2 · XDR · comparative prompt · first choice
“If you need the absolute best detection and have the budget, CrowdStrike or Palo Alto Cortex XDR are the top picks.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · XDR · comparative prompt · first choice
“Palo Alto Cortex XDR – often rated #1 overall for correlation quality and data coverage” DeepSeek V4 Flash · XDR · comparative prompt · first choice
“Palo Alto and CrowdStrike lead in AI-driven detection and automation.” Mistral Small · XDR · comparative prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Complex policy tuning/detections leading to high false positives/noise (requires expertise), steep learning curve ... aggressive pricing” Grok 4.1 Fast · XDR · negative prompt · soft negative
“Robust platform, but multiple security advisories and documented bypasses mean you must: Keep agents and content updates current.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · EDR · negative prompt · soft negative
“Major "Native" XDR vendors (such as Palo Alto Cortex, Microsoft Defender, and CrowdStrike)... Why to be cautious” Qwen 3.7 Flash · XDR · negative prompt · soft negative
“is good, but it's usually positioned more as an enterprise/advanced option than the cheapest choice” GPT-5.4 mini · XDR · budget prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 175 of the 213 answers that named Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR and are not a share of its labels.
675 of the 675 domain citations in answers naming Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at palo.ai is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.