Every category where a model named Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
SIEM platforms	Security operations	0%	10 of 49	8%	13	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	0	2
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	2	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct7 labels2

Paraphrase6 labels2

Comparative18 labelsNone

Budget-constrained7 labels3

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative7 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative49 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“| Palo Alto Cortex XSIAM | Converged platform | Cloud | Platform license | ML auto-incidents, SOAR built-in |” Grok 4.1 Fast · SIEM · scale prompt · alternative

“converged XDR/SIEM/SOAR platform with platform-based (non-volume) pricing and heavy ML automation” DeepSeek V4 Flash · SIEM · comparative prompt · alternative

“Choose Cortex XSIAM if: - You want a converged XDR\u2011SIEM\u2011SOAR\u2011ASM platform” GLM 4.7 FlashX · SIEM · comparative prompt · alternative

“Go with Palo Alto Cortex XSIAM if your goal is security platform consolidation” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SIEM · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“it may be more than necessary for typical mid-market needs” MiniMax M2.5 · SIEM · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM, over the 49 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Microsoft Sentinel40 of 499Not in the top three

Splunk Enterprise Security32 of 499Not in the top three

IBM QRadar31 of 490Not in the top three

Exabeam25 of 490Not in the top three

Google Security Operations22 of 491Not in the top three

Elastic Security22 of 490Not in the top three

Rapid7 InsightIDR17 of 494Not in the top three

CrowdStrike Falcon Next-Gen SIEM15 of 490Not in the top three

Securonix15 of 490Not in the top three

LogRhythm13 of 490Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 41 of the 49 answers that named Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

paloaltonetworks.com35

underdefense.com33

gartner.com21

exabeam.com20

expertinsights.com20

solutionsreview.com15

cipherssecurity.com14

manageengine.com12

guardsarm.com10

puppygraph.com10

190 of the 190 domain citations in answers naming Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

paloaltonetworks.com/cyberpedia/siem-tools-comparison32

underdefense.com/blog/siem-solutions-comparison31

expertinsights.com/security-operations/the-top-siem-solutions19

gartner.com/reviews/market/security-information-event-management19

exabeam.com/explainers/siem-tools/siem-buyers-guide14

cipherssecurity.com/best-siem-tools-in-2026-compared11

manageengine.com/log-management/top-siem-tools.html11

solutionsreview.com/security-information-event-management/whats-changed-2024-gartner-magic11

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM; a claim can dispute any of them.

Palo Alto Cortex XSIAM 4Cortex XSIAM 2Palo Alto XSIAM 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at palo.ai is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.