| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT service management | IT operations and endpoint | 21% | 2 of 48 | 6% | 53 | accepted challenger |
| Incident management and on-call | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 14 of 53 | 11% | 28 | accepted challenger |
| IT asset management | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 20 of 61 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Snipe-IT at 24% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 10 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 10 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 6 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 9 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 7 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 9 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 7 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If your B2B company has an internal software development, product, or engineering team that already uses Jira, JSM is almost always the best choice.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ITSM · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Best overall "mid‑market" ITSM platform in 2024‑2025: Jira Service Management (for dev‑centric orgs) or Freshservice” MiniMax M2.5 · ITSM · direct prompt · first choice
“JSM is the preferred platform for technology-first organizations, rapidly scaling companies, and software-led enterprises.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ITSM · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose Jira Service Management if: Your organization values speed, cost transparency, and seamless collaboration” Qwen 3.7 Flash · ITSM · comparative prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Choose Jira Service Management/Opsgenie migration only if Atlassian alignment matters more than best-in-class incident response” GPT-5.4 mini · Incidents · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“be cautious if you need a dedicated engineering incident platform, because it is positioned as an ITSM platform” Perplexity Sonar · Incidents · negative prompt · soft negative
“moving to JSM results in higher costs ("2x price increase for same features") and more manual processes” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Incidents · negative prompt · soft negative
“Be Cautious (Solid but Significant Drawbacks): Jira Service Management ... Steep learning curve” Grok 4.1 Fast · ITSM · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 195 of the 241 answers that named Jira Service Management and are not a share of its labels.
509 of the 558 domain citations in answers naming Jira Service Management came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Jira Service Management's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Jira Service Management, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at atlassian.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.