Mid-marketgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsNot ranked
Jira · 1 category · Named, not rankedJira Service Management Assets
6Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Jira Service Management Assets was named 2 times in ITAM, where Freshservice led with 31%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market32 of 82
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise21 of 91
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
In itam · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Jira Service Management Assets for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT asset management | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 32 of 82 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Freshservice at 31% | goneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Jira Service Management Assets held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · ITAM · by segment
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 19 → 51 of 85
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITAM | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 49 → 32 of 82 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Jira Service Management Assets across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Jira Service Management Assets across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Jira Service Management Assets, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Jira Service Management Assets was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Jira Service Management Assets, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Jira Service Management Assets was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Jira Service Management Assets. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 6 answers that named Jira Service Management Assets and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
flexera.com4
cloudaware.com3
docs.lansweeper.com3
servicenow.com3
virima.com3
atlassian.comYour site2
cloudnuro.ai2
ezo.io2
gartner.com2
ivanti.com2
Twenty-four of the twenty-six domain citations in answers naming Jira Service Management Assets came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
atlassian.com ranks 4 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Jira Service Management Assets takes 0% of first choices and Freshservice takes 31%.ShowHide
Search and answers
atlassian.com ranks 4 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Jira Service Management Assets takes 0% of first choices and Freshservice takes 31%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “it asset management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “it asset management platforms”
4
- Its company's site
- atlassian.com shared with Jira's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 4,724,388 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 192,288 · 33,627 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 137,840
- Paid Google search
- 33 searches its ads show for, about 356 clicks and $5,906 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 32 of 82 in ITAM
Segment leader
31%
Freshservice
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 6 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 6 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Jira Service Management Assets
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Jira Service Management Assets; a claim can dispute any of them.
Jira Assets 1
Follow Jira Service Management Assets
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Jira is the company behind Jira Service Management Assets.ShowHide
The company
Jira is the company behind Jira Service Management Assets.
ShowHideOn record
Company recordsIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Deliver service at high-velocity
- For
- IT professionals
- Price stated
- 1,000 objects per month* atlassian.com/software/jira/pricing
- Customers named
- Software AGDISH WirelessEMC InsuranceCHG HealthcareSOPHOS
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Jira Service Management Assets's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: atlassian.com, atlassian.com/software/jira/pricing, trust.atlassian.com, atlassian.com/platform, atlassian.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Jira Service Management Assets's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Jira Service Management Assets, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Jira Service Management Assets by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Jira Service Management Assets is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Jira Service Management Assets, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.