Cyber risk quantification
Asked as “cyber risk quantification tool”, and as “CRQ platform”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 51 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the October 2026 Edition on October 4, 2026; its answers are read by the distilled judge (ai-indexes-judge-qwen3-14b-run3), not the claude-opus-5 judge of the earlier categories: how the two compare.
Standing · first-choice share
25%
Contested · Kovrr 12%
25CyberSaint CyberStrong12Kovrr08SAFE Security55others
25% of first choices, contested.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01
CyberSaint CyberStrong25%0%26accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 25% now.
CyberSaint CyberStrong25%0%26accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 25% now.Show the one product at 0%, ordered by negative rate
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
Head to head
All ten head-to-head pages: the top five products, each against each
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04R05
06Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01CyberSaint CyberStrong25%
CyberSaint CyberStrong25%02Kovrr12%
Kovrr12%03SAFE Security8%
SAFE Security8%04Axio6%
Axio6%05RiskLens2%
06Balbix0%
Balbix0%What they warned about
Zero of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
RiskLens
37%
10 of 27 labels negative · 7 of 14 models
“transparent pricing compared to most enterprise CRQ tools (like RiskLens or SAFE Security) that typically start at $25K–$200K+ annually” DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt
SAFE Security32%
13 of 40 labels negative · 7 of 14 models
“such as Kovrr, Safe Security, and Axio) are generally out of reach, as their annual licensing fees frequently scale into the tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars” Gemini 3.5 Flash, budget prompt
Axio16%
5 of 32 labels negative · 4 of 14 models
“six-figure platform costs seen for enterprise tools such as Risk Cloud Quantify, Safe Security, Axio and RiskLens” Muse Glimmer 30B, budget prompt
Kovrr13%
4 of 30 labels negative · 3 of 14 models
“standard enterprise Cyber Risk Quantification (CRQ) tools (such as Kovrr, Safe Security, and Axio) are generally out of reach” Gemini 3.5 Flash, budget prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
74 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1014 links across 207 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. None of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category.
40 answers · 52 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Kovrr35 answers · 60 citations · 13 models
29 answers · 31 citations · 11 models
28 answers · 28 citations · 10 models
26 answers · 29 citations · 11 models
vendor site · CyberSaint24 answers · 35 citations · 12 models
23 answers · 30 citations · 9 models
vendor site · vCISO Lite21 answers · 28 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G221 answers · 27 citations · 10 models
19 answers · 23 citations · 7 models
vendor site · MetricStream17 answers · 20 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Bitsight15 answers · 18 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
37 answers · 10 models
29 answers · 11 models
28 answers · 10 models
21 answers · 10 models
20 answers · 11 models
19 answers · 8 models
17 answers · 7 models
16 answers · 7 models
14 answers · 6 models
14 answers · 9 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best cyber risk quantification tool”, “cyber risk quantification tool”, “cyber risk quantification tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CyberSaint CyberStrong cybersaint.io | 25% | 54 | 0 | 21,504 | 1 | 9 | |
| Kovrr kovrr.com | 12% | 108 | 140 | 3 | 30,981 | 3 | 4 |
| SAFE Security safe.security | 8% | 115 | 2,400 | 5,496 | 1,015,372 | 12 | 8 |
| Axio axio.com | 6% | 96 | 5,400 | 3,654 | 1,815 | 0 | |
| Maxxsure | 6% | 90 | 0 | ||||
| CyberQRM | 4% | ||||||
| Axio360 | 4% | 50 | 0 | ||||
| FAIR-U | 4% | ||||||
| Fair TPRM fairtprm.com | 4% | 9 | |||||
| FairCRQ | 4% | 0 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 26 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (cybersaint.io, kovrr.com, metricstream.com, vcso.ai). The first result for “best cyber risk quantification tool” is cybersierra.co.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best cyber risk quantification tool for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which CRQ platform would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top cyber risk quantification tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best cyber risk quantification tool for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a cyber risk quantification tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which cyber risk quantification tools should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Cyrismano first choiceChangedSAFE Securityno first choiceno first choiceagainst: FAIR, LogicGate, SafeSecurity
Three alternatives
Black Kite, Maxxsure, SAI360Four alternatives
Axio, CyberSaint CyberStrong, Kovrr, RiskLensFour alternatives
Blacksmith, CISA CSET, SAFE Security, VulnRiskGPT-5.4 miniSAFE SecurityQualtricsChangedagainst: RQ PlatformRiskLens, SAFE Securityagainst: OCTAVEFAIR-Uagainst: RiskLens, SAFE Securityno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Kovrr, ThreatConnect Risk QuantifierThree alternatives
G2, Trustpilot, unitQOne alternative
Open FAIR tools / spreadsheet-based FAIROne alternative
Security Decision Labs / FAIR cyber risk quantification toolkitGemini 3.5 FlashKovrragainst: SAFE SecurityAxioChangedSAFE SecuritySimpleRiskagainst: Axio, Kovrr, SAFE Securityno first choiceagainst: RiskLens
Two alternatives
Axio, CyberSaint CyberStrongTwo alternatives
Kovrr, SAFE SecurityFour alternatives
Axio, CyberSaint CyberStrong, KPMG Cyber Risk Insights, KovrrFive alternatives
CyberQRM, FAIR-U, Hive Systems Quantitative Cyber Risk Assessment Tool, evaluator, pyfairPerplexity SonarCyberSaint CyberStrongagainst: CYE, UpGuardCyberSaint CyberStrong, SAFE SecurityChangedno first choiceComp AIno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
RiskLens, SAFE OneOne alternative
RiskLensThree alternatives
Axio, Kovrr, SAFE SecurityGrok 4.1 FastCyberSaint CyberStrongagainst: Axio, Balbix, SAFE SecurityKovrrChangedSAFE SecurityFair TPRMagainst: Balbix, LogicGate, RiskLensno first choiceagainst: Axio, Balbix, RiskLens
Three alternatives
Cyber Quant, Maxxsure, vCISO LiteThree alternatives
Balbix, CyberSaint CyberStrong, X-AnalyticsFour alternatives
Axio, Balbix, Kovrr, ResilienceThree alternatives
CyberQRM, FAIR Institute resources, Security Decision Science GitHub toolsMistral SmallCyberSaint CyberStrong, MaxxsureKovrr, ResilienceChangedSAFE SecurityFAIR-Uno first choiceagainst: SAFE Security
One alternative
RiskLensTwo alternatives
SAFE One, vCISO LiteFour alternatives
Axio, Balbix, CyQuant, ResilienceTwo alternatives
CISA’s CSET, NIST’s Cybersecurity FrameworkDeepSeek V4 FlashCyberSaint CyberStrongagainst: BalbixKovrrChangedSAFE SecurityCyberQRM, FairCRQagainst: Axio, RiskLens, SAFE Securityno first choiceagainst: SAFE Security, ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier
Three alternatives
Axio, SAFE Security, vCISO LiteThree alternatives
Axio, SAFE Security, vCISO LiteFour alternatives
Axio, Balbix, Bitsight, KovrrThree alternatives
Hyperproof, Resiliently, SARA Open-SourceLlama 4 MaverickCyberSaint CyberStrongKovrrChangedno first choiceRiskLensno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Axio, Maxxsure, RiskLensTwo alternatives
C-Risk, MaxxsureTwo alternatives
Balbix, KovrrQwen 3.7 FlashCyberSaint CyberStrong, MaxxsureMaxxsureChangedRiskCloudMicrosoft Excelagainst: Databeagle, RiskLensno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Black Kite, RiskLensTwo alternatives
Cyber Quant, vCISO LiteFour alternatives
Krare Insights, LogicManager, Satori, The FAIR InstituteSix alternatives
Airtable, Notion, OpenFAIR Institute, PowerBI, PyRisk / RiskLib, SimplicityKimi K2CyberSaint CyberStrongagainst: Kovrr, RiskLens, SAFE SecurityAxio360Changedagainst: SAFE SecuritySAFE SecurityCyberQRMCyberSaint CyberStrong, Cyrisma, Kovrragainst: RiskLens, SAFE Security
Two alternatives
Axio, MaxxsureOne alternative
KovrrSix alternatives
Axio, Balbix, Bitsight, CyberSaint CyberStrong, Ostrich Cyber-Risk, TenableTwo alternatives
ComplyJet, Fair TPRMFour alternatives
Axio, Hyperproof, LogicGate, SAFE SecurityGLM 4.7 FlashXCyberSaint CyberStrong, SAFE Securityno first choiceChangedBalbix, BitsightFAIR Excel Spreadsheetno first choicenothing named
Five alternatives
Axio, Balbix, LogicGate Risk Cloud, RiskLens, UpGuardThree alternatives
AuditBoard, CyberSaint CyberStrong, MetricStreamTwo alternatives
CISA CSET Tool, NIST SP 800-30 Risk Assessment GuideMiniMax M2.5CyberSaint CyberStrongCyberSaint CyberStrong, SAFE SecurityChangedSAFE SecurityHiveSystems Quantitative Risk Assessment Tool, Wolferdawg Cyber Risk Assessmentno first choicenothing named
Five alternatives
Bitsight, Black Kite, Kovrr, LogicGate Risk Cloud, UpGuardOne alternative
AxioThree alternatives
Axio, Balbix, RiskLensThree alternatives
CISA CSET, CyberSaint CyberStrong, vCISO LiteGPT-6 LunaAxio360AxioChangedSAFE OneVulcagainst: FAIR-U Workbookno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
CyberSaint CyberStrong, SAFE SecurityTwo alternatives
CyberSaint CyberStrong, SAFE OneThree alternatives
Axio360, CyberSaint CyberStrong, KovrrOne alternative
CyberQRMMuse Glimmer 30BCyberSaint CyberStrongAxioChangedagainst: Kovrr, RiskLens, SAFE SecuritySAFE Securityagainst: ThreatConnectFair TPRM, FairCRQagainst: Axio, Risk Cloud Quantify, RiskLens, SAFE Securityno first choiceagainst: Kovrr, SAFE Security
Three alternatives
Maxxsure, RiskLens, SAFE SecurityThree alternatives
Axio, Balbix, RiskLensOne alternative
MitigataBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 23:44 | yes | 15 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 01:38 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 23:35 | yes | 8 | 30 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 23:39 | yes | 24 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 01:18 | yes | 20 | 11 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 23:54 | yes | 17 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 23:46 | yes | 19 | 54 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 01:54 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 00:40 | yes | 5 | 13 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 00:44 | yes | 13 | 39 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 23:56 | yes | 13 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 01:32 | yes | 5 | 11 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 01:12 | yes | 3 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-04 22:17 | yes | 14 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 01:23 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 01:43 | yes | 4 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 00:04 | yes | 15 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 01:50 | yes | 26 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 22:16 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 23:09 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 00:00 | yes | 20 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 22:30 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 01:17 | yes | 8 | 69 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 22:57 | yes | 23 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 00:42 | yes | 15 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 01:37 | yes | 12 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 00:25 | yes | 3 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 01:36 | yes | 20 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 01:23 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 01:00 | yes | 4 | 11 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 00:42 | yes | 13 | 27 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 00:57 | yes | 23 | 4 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 00:44 | yes | 21 | 16 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 00:46 | yes | 16 | 11 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 01:20 | yes | 23 | 38 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 00:28 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 01:45 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 01:44 | yes | 19 | 31 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 23:47 | yes | 24 | 51 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 22:42 | yes | 18 | 37 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 01:35 | yes | 7 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 01:29 | yes | 19 | 34 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 01:41 | yes | 16 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 01:02 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 22:26 | yes | 11 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 00:33 | yes | 21 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 23:49 | yes | 23 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 01:38 | yes | 14 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 01:53 | yes | 18 | 47 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 23:52 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 23:21 | no | 0 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 01:23 | yes | 19 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 01:18 | yes | 15 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 00:07 | yes | 10 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-04 23:46 | yes | 3 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 01:28 | yes | 14 | 13 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 01:41 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 00:43 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 22:27 | yes | 13 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 23:29 | yes | 17 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 01:26 | yes | 25 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 22:23 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 01:35 | yes | 17 | 55 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 01:41 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 00:38 | yes | 9 | 38 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 01:12 | yes | 24 | 47 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 01:42 | yes | 15 | 103 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 01:29 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-04 23:50 | yes | 2 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 00:13 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 23:04 | yes | 19 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 22:09 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 00:03 | yes | 17 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 22:52 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 00:45 | yes | 23 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 22:17 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 01:13 | yes | 19 | 50 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 00:22 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 00:52 | no | 0 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 22:32 | yes | 24 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 00:40 | yes | 22 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 01:43 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-04 22:26 | yes | 3 | 16 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-04 22:34 | yes | 13 | 21 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
CyberSaint read as CyberSaint CyberStrong
CyberSaint (CyberStrong Platform) read as CyberSaint CyberStrong
CyberSaint (CyberStrong platform) read as CyberSaint CyberStrong
CyberSaint (CyberStrong) read as CyberSaint CyberStrong
Cybersaint read as CyberSaint CyberStrong
SAFE read as SAFE One
Safe read as SAFE One
Unresolved, counted raw
Basic FAIR Analysis
Bitsight Cyber Quant / RiskRecon
Blacksmith
CISA CSET Tool (Free)
CISA’s CSET
CyanoRisk
CyberQuant
Databeagle
Deep-Insight’s Deep-Dive platform
FAIR Excel Spreadsheet (Free)
FAIR Institute partners
FAIR Institute resources
FAIR-U Workbook
Hive Systems Quantitative Cyber Risk Assessment Tool
HiveSystems Quantitative Risk Assessment Tool
KPMG CRI
Krare Insights
Logit
Mitigata
NIST SP 800-30 Risk Assessment Guide (Free)
NIST’s Cybersecurity Framework
Open FAIR tools / spreadsheet-based FAIR
OpenFAIR Institute
Ostrich Cyber-Risk (Birdseye)
Palantir Technologies
PowerBI
PyRisk / RiskLib
RQ Platform
RiskCloud (by MDR)
RiskCloud Quantify
SARA Open-Source
SafeSecurity
Security Decision Labs / FAIR cyber risk quantification toolkit
Security Decision Science GitHub tools
Simplicity
The FAIR Institute (Insight Manager)
Trustpilot
Vulc
Wolferdawg Cyber Risk Assessment
unitQ
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
Follow Cyber risk quantification
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this category moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.