| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT service management | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 65 of 69 | 43% | 21 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITSM | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 40 → 65 of 69 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Enterprises requiring unified endpoint management + ITSM (especially in healthcare or government): Ivanti Neurons” MiniMax M2.5 · ITSM · comparative prompt · alternative
“If your priority is linking incidents directly to patching and vulnerability data, Ivanti is a strong contender.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · ITSM · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best if endpoint/device management matters a lot: Ivanti Neurons for ITSM” GPT-5.4 mini · ITSM · comparative prompt · alternative
“Choose Ivanti if automation and employee experience are top priorities” Kimi K2 · ITSM · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Legacy/Glitchy Options (e.g., SolarWinds Service Desk, Ivanti Neurons)... Dated interfaces and bugs” Grok 4.20 · ITSM · negative prompt · hard negative
“Strict Avoid: BMC Helix ... and Ivanti (pending proof of improved security stability).” Qwen 3.7 Flash · ITSM · negative prompt · hard negative
“considered the one to be most cautious about due to a serious, ongoing security track record” Mistral Small · ITSM · negative prompt · hard negative
“powerful enterprise tools like ServiceNow, BMC Helix, and Ivanti are "robust, feature-rich... However, these platforms are often overkill for SMBs."” Muse Glimmer 30B · ITSM · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 56 of the 66 answers that named Ivanti Neurons for ITSM and are not a share of its labels.
161 of the 181 domain citations in answers naming Ivanti Neurons for ITSM came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Ivanti Neurons for ITSM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Ivanti Neurons for ITSM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Ivanti Neurons for ITSM by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: