AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Ivanti Neurons for ITSM · October 2026 Edition
Ivanti · 1 category · Ranked

Ivanti Neurons for ITSM

66Judge labels
0First choices
19Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in ITSM for mid-market buyers
Rank 65 of 69 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 43% of its 21 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Ivanti Neurons for ITSM →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In itsm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Ivanti Neurons for ITSM for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
IT service managementIT operations and endpoint0%65 of 6943%21criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Ivanti Neurons for ITSM held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · ITSM · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 57 → 55 of 57
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 40 → 54 of 56
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 8 of 45, unchanged

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
ITSM0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 40 → 65 of 69

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Ivanti Neurons for ITSM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500011
GPT-5.4 mini01012
Gemini 3.5 Flash00011
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.2001012
Mistral Small00112
DeepSeek V4 Flash00011
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01113
Kimi K201012
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.501001
GPT-6 Luna01102
Muse Glimmer 30B00213

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct7 labelsNone
Paraphrase4 labelsNone
Comparative22 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained6 labelsNone
Negative25 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative66 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Enterprises requiring unified endpoint management + ITSM (especially in healthcare or government): Ivanti Neurons” MiniMax M2.5 · ITSM · comparative prompt · alternative
“If your priority is linking incidents directly to patching and vulnerability data, Ivanti is a strong contender.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · ITSM · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best if endpoint/device management matters a lot: Ivanti Neurons for ITSM” GPT-5.4 mini · ITSM · comparative prompt · alternative
“Choose Ivanti if automation and employee experience are top priorities” Kimi K2 · ITSM · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Legacy/Glitchy Options (e.g., SolarWinds Service Desk, Ivanti Neurons)... Dated interfaces and bugs” Grok 4.20 · ITSM · negative prompt · hard negative
“Strict Avoid: BMC Helix ... and Ivanti (pending proof of improved security stability).” Qwen 3.7 Flash · ITSM · negative prompt · hard negative
“considered the one to be most cautious about due to a serious, ongoing security track record” Mistral Small · ITSM · negative prompt · hard negative
“powerful enterprise tools like ServiceNow, BMC Helix, and Ivanti are "robust, feature-rich... However, these platforms are often overkill for SMBs."” Muse Glimmer 30B · ITSM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Ivanti Neurons for ITSM, over the 66 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Ivanti Neurons for ITSM was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
ServiceNow ITSM61 of 6627Not among the top eight
BMC Helix ITSM52 of 661Not among the top eight
Jira Service Management47 of 664Not among the top eight
Freshservice44 of 667Not among the top eight
ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus28 of 660Not among the top eight
Zendesk16 of 660Not among the top eight
SolarWinds Service Desk12 of 661Not among the top eight
HaloITSM11 of 660Not among the top eight
SysAid10 of 660Not among the top eight
Cherwell Service Management7 of 660Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Ivanti Neurons for ITSM. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 56 of the 66 answers that named Ivanti Neurons for ITSM and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

atomicwork.com23
virima.com22
ivanti.comYour site20
freshworks.com19
motadata.com18
gartner.com17
blog.invgate.com16
servicenow.com16
ones.com15
teamdynamix.com15

161 of the 181 domain citations in answers naming Ivanti Neurons for ITSM came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Ivanti Neurons for ITSM stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Searches for its name, Google
140 a month (“ivanti neurons for itsm”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
3 a month
Its own site
It sits on Ivanti's site (ivanti.com), so there are no site figures for it alone

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 65 of 69 in ITSM
Segment leader
58%
Freshservice
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
66 answers
Its own site cited
in 56 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Ivanti Neurons for ITSM

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Ivanti Neurons for ITSM; a claim can dispute any of them.
Ivanti 6Ivanti Neurons 5Ivanti Service Manager (Neurons) 1

Follow Ivanti Neurons for ITSM

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Ivanti is the company behind Ivanti Neurons for ITSM.
ShowHide
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Ivanti Neurons for ITSM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Ivanti Neurons for ITSM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Ivanti Neurons for ITSM by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Ivanti Neurons for ITSM is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Ivanti Neurons for ITSM, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at ivanti.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.