Every category where a model named Optro for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
GRC platforms	Security operations	0%	17 of 75	11%	9	under 10 labels · led by Hyperproof at 19%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
AI governance platforms	Data platform	0%	44 of 135	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Credo AI at 18%
Compliance automation	Security operations	0%	32 of 67	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Drata at 34%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Third-party risk management	Security operations	0%	28 of 87	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by UpGuard at 55%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Cyber risk quantification	Security operations	0%	95 of 116	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by CyberSaint CyberStrong at 25%

Movement

Since September 2026, Optro held within the floor in all five categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · GRC · by segment

Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 47 of 58, unchanged

Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 30 → 17 of 69

Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

2%from 4% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 7 → 11 of 65

All categories · Mid-market

Category	September 2026	Now	Change	Reading	Rank
GRC	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 30 → 17 of 75
AI governance	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 44 of 135, unchanged
Compliance automation	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 23 → 32 of 67
TPRM	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 28 of 87, unchanged
Cyber risk quant	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 95 of 116, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Optro across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1	1	3
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	2	0	3
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	2	1	0	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.20	1	1	1	0	3
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	1	1	0	2
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct7 labels1

Paraphrase3 labels1

Comparative18 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained7 labelsNone

Negative11 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative47 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Favor leaders like Optro/AuditBoard (G2 4.6/5, 1,500+ reviews, Fortune 500 trust)” Grok 4.20 · GRC · negative prompt · first choice

“Optro expects an audit function to already exist, which makes it a fit for public and pre-IPO companies carrying SOX obligations” Claude Haiku 4.5 · GRC · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best for: Unifying AI governance directly into traditional enterprise risk programs.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · AI governance · comparative prompt · alternative

“it is widely considered the gold standard for Internal Audit and SOX compliance” Gemini 3.5 Flash · GRC · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“post-sales support dropping off significantly after go-live, and reporting has gaps” Claude Haiku 4.5 · GRC · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Optro, over the 47 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Optro was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Vanta26 of 478Not among the top eight

Drata24 of 477Not among the top eight

ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management23 of 471Not among the top eight

MetricStream21 of 470Not among the top eight

Archer16 of 470Not among the top eight

Hyperproof15 of 470Not among the top eight

OneTrust GRC14 of 470Not among the top eight

Secureframe14 of 470Not among the top eight

AuditBoard12 of 470Not among the top eight

LogicGate11 of 471Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Optro. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 47 of the 47 answers that named Optro and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

optro.aiYour site25

vanta.com20

complyjet.com13

g2.com12

gartner.com12

metricstream.com12

orbiqhq.com11

expertinsights.com10

drata.com8

diligent.com7

105 of the 130 domain citations in answers naming Optro came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

metricstream.com/blog/top-governance-risk-compliance-grc-tools.html9

vanta.com/resources/best-grc-software-solutions-for-enterprises9

expertinsights.com/compliance/the-top-governance-risk-compliance-grc-platforms7

bdemerson.com/article/the-best-grc-software-a-practical-evaluation6

complyjet.com/blog/best-grc-software6

orbiqhq.com/compliance-automation/best-grc-software6

enzuzo.com/blog/best-grc-software5

hackernoon.com/12-best-governance-risk-and-compliance-grc-tools-and-software-for-2026-comp5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

optro.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Optro takes 0% of first choices and Hyperproof takes 19%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “grc platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “grc platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 2,900 a month (“optro”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 39 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 126,117 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 9,596 · 1,715 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 5,057
Paid Google search: 4 searches its ads show for, about 315 clicks and $4,599 a month (estimate)

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

120+ ads · 118 text, 2 video · 75 shown in the last 30 days

First shown August 2023, as Optro, Inc, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 102 in the year, 18 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 17 of 75 in GRC

Segment leader

19%

Hyperproof

First choices: 2 across its categories
Named in: 47 answers
Its own site cited: in 47 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on optro.ai

2,141

subdomains included

Content

1,892

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

24 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	1,358	undated		GRC, TPRM
Webinar or virtual event	293	undated		GRC, TPRM
Report or ebook	87	9	2026-09-25	GRC, TPRM
Case study	79	undated
Template or tool	26	undated		GRC
Glossary or explainer	20	undated
Comparison	13	undated
Conference or event	12	undated		GRC
Podcast or video	2	undated
News or press	2	undated

Most recent

2026-09-25Vendor sprawl guide report or ebook
2026-09-15Risk in focus 2027 north america report or ebook
2026-09-09G sib report report or ebook
2026-09-08Bcm reality checklist report or ebook
2026-08-25Agentic ai playbook for auditors report or ebook
2026-08-05Agentic ai report report or ebook

Events in person

Upcoming

November 10, 2026 to November 11, 2026#RISK Expo Europe 2026ExCeL London, London, U.K.

Last twelve months

October 13, 2026 to October 15, 2026in-person experienceSan Diego · took part
October 13, 2026AI & GRC WorkshopGaylord Pacific Resort, San Diego · took part
October 13, 2026 to October 15, 2026CRX (Connected Risk Experience)Gaylord Pacific Resort, San Diego · took part
October 12, 2026 to October 14, 2026Infosec World 2026Gaylord Palms, Orlando
September 28, 2026 to September 29, 2026Gartner Enterprise Risk, Audit and Compliance Conference — EMEALondon, U.K.
September 27, 2026 to September 29, 2026MBA Compliance and Risk Management ConferenceGrand Hyatt, Washington
September 15, 2026 to September 16, 2026Gartner Enterprise Risk, Audit and Compliance Conference — AmericasGrapevine
August 17, 2026 to August 19, 2026GRC Conference 2026 (ISACA and The IIA)Gaylord Pacific Resort and Convention Center, San Diego

As the event pages on optro.ai state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page optro.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Optro

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Optro; a claim can dispute any of them.

Optro (formerly AuditBoard) 5AuditBoard / Optro 1Optro (AuditBoard AI Governance) 1Optro (formerly AuditBoard / FairNow) 1Optro/AuditBoard 1

Follow Optro

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Optro is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: AI-Powered GRC Software
optro.ai
For: enterprises
optro.ai
Price stated: Request Optro Pricing optro.ai/pricing
Certifications: ISO 27001SOC 2 Type IISOC 1 Type IICCPAGDPRHECVATCSAHIPAA
Customers named: PetSmartLennar HomesMarmon HoldingsPopulation Services InternationalEdgewellArthur J. GallagherTeradataMDA
Not stated on the pages read: Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What Optro's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: optro.ai, optro.ai/pricing, trust.optro.ai, optro.ai/platform, optro.ai/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Optro's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Optro, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Optro by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Optro is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Optro, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.