IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › SAP GRC · September 2026 Edition

SAP · 1 category · Named, not ranked

SAP GRC

20Judge labels

0First choices

11Negative labels

9 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

6 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SAP GRC was named 6 times in GRC, where Vanta led with 14%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business67 of 71

under the label threshold

Mid-market71 of 77

under the label threshold

Enterprise35 of 47

under the label threshold

In grc · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SAP GRC for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
GRC platforms	Security operations	0%	71 of 77	50%	6	under 10 labels · led by Vanta at 14%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SAP GRC yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SAP GRC across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	1	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative6 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative11 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative20 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you're SAP-heavy, prioritize SAP GRC.” GPT-5.4 mini · GRC · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“ERP "add-on" GRC modules (SAP GRC, Oracle GRC modules) | Vendor lock-in, limited functionality” Kimi K2 · GRC · negative prompt · soft negative

“they can be over-engineered for smaller teams and slower to deploy” GPT-5.4 mini · GRC · negative prompt · soft negative

“otherwise it can feel heavyweight” Perplexity Sonar · GRC · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SAP GRC, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAP GRC was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management18 of 203Not in the top three

MetricStream14 of 201Not in the top three

Archer13 of 200Not in the top three

IBM OpenPages9 of 200Not in the top three

OneTrust9 of 200Not in the top three

Drata8 of 202Not in the top three

Vanta7 of 202Not in the top three

Hyperproof7 of 201Not in the top three

Diligent One7 of 200Not in the top three

AuditBoard5 of 200Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SAP GRC. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 19 of the 20 answers that named SAP GRC and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

expertinsights.com10

gartner.com8

reddit.com7

auditxyz.com6

linkedin.com6

zengrc.com6

cybersierra.co5

devopsschool.com5

vanta.com5

apono.io4

Sixty-two of the sixty-two domain citations in answers naming SAP GRC came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

expertinsights.com/compliance/the-top-governance-risk-compliance-grc-platforms8

devopsschool.com/blog/top-10-grc-governance-risk-compliance-platforms-features-pros-cons-c5

apono.io/blog/top-10-governance-risk-and-compliance-grc-software-solutions4

auditxyz.com/compare/best-grc-tools4

avacompli.com/blog/grc-platform-comparison.html4

ciopages.com/buyer-guides/grc-platform4

reddit.com/r/cybersecurity/comments/1ay5u9v/what_grc_software_is_suitable_in_features_and4

complyjet.com/blog/best-grc-software3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as SAP GRC

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SAP GRC; a claim can dispute any of them.

SAP 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SAP GRC's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SAP GRC, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sapgrc.ai is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.