Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 66 → 51 of 58
SAP · 2 categories · RankedSAP GRC
25Judge labels
0First choices
12Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in GRC for enterprise buyers
Rank 65 of 75 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 50% of its 4 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business53 of 60
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market65 of 75
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise66 of 67
0%10 labels
criticized challenger
In grc · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named SAP GRC for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRC platforms | Security operations | 0% | 65 of 75 | 50% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Hyperproof at 19% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Third-party risk management | Security operations | 0% | 78 of 87 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by UpGuard at 55% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, SAP GRC held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · GRC · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 68 → 61 of 69
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 34 → 61 of 65
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRC | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 68 → 65 of 75 |
| TPRM | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 78 of 87, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated SAP GRC across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated SAP GRC across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative7 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained5 labelsNone
Negative9 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative25 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you run SAP → SAP GRC is essentially required for deep ERP access control.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · GRC · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“SAP GRC: For organizations without extensive SAP infrastructure, this may be overkill” GLM 4.7 FlashX · GRC · negative prompt · hard negative
“you likely lack the resources and budget for massive Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) modules like RSA Archer or SAP GRC.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · TPRM · scale prompt · soft negative
“Avoids the complexity and cost of enterprise suites (ServiceNow, MetricStream, SAP)” Kimi K2 · GRC · scale prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SAP GRC, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAP GRC was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SAP GRC, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAP GRC was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SAP GRC. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 19 of the 25 answers that named SAP GRC and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
vanta.com12
expertinsights.com10
riskonnect.com8
cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com7
cybersierra.co7
enzuzo.com7
riskwatch.com7
surecloud.com7
complyjet.com6
metricstream.com6
Seventy-seven of the seventy-seven domain citations in answers naming SAP GRC came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where SAP GRC stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where SAP GRC stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 880 a month (“sap grc”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 236 a month
- Its own site
- It sits on SAP's site (sap.com), so there are no site figures for it alone
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 65 of 75 in GRC
Segment leader
19%
Hyperproof
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 25 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 19 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as SAP GRC
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SAP GRC; a claim can dispute any of them.
SAP 1
Follow SAP GRC
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
SAP is the company behind SAP GRC.ShowHide
The company
SAP is the company behind SAP GRC.
ShowHideOn record
Company records- Also from SAP
- SAP AI, SAP Access Control, SAP Ariba, SAP BTP, SAP BTP API Management, SAP Build Process Automation, SAP Business ByDesign, SAP Business Data Cloud and 19 more
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Enabling migration and easy mass-maintenance of master data in SAP GRC.
- For
- end-users of SAP GRC
- Price stated
- Price upon request; 4900 EUR Per Year sap.com/products/financial-management/partners/riscomp-gmbh-framework-update-addon-for-sap-grc.html
- Starting price
- 4900 sap.com/products/financial-management/partners/riscomp-gmbh-framework-update-addon-for-sap-grc.html
- Certifications
- SAP Certified - Integration with SAP S/4HANAISO 27001 (Information Security Management)ISO 12207 (Software Lifecycle)
- Not stated on the pages read
- Free plan or trial, integrations, hosting, customers
What SAP GRC's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: sap.com/products/financial-management/partners/riscomp-gmbh-framework-update-addon-for-sap-grc.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SAP GRC's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SAP GRC, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SAP GRC by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where SAP GRC is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name SAP GRC, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.