Every category where a model named Diligent One for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
GRC platforms	Security operations	0%	27 of 77	22%	9	under 10 labels · led by Vanta at 14%
Third-party risk management	Security operations	0%	23 of 72	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by UpGuard at 53%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Diligent One yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Diligent One across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	1	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	2	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	0	2
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	2	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative21 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative11 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative42 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you care most about board governance and executive visibility, consider Diligent.” GPT-5.4 mini · GRC · comparative prompt · alternative

“Leader in Gartner; noted for execution in assurance-focused TPRM.” Grok 4.1 Fast · TPRM · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“High cost of ownership and longer implementation cycles (months to years)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · GRC · comparative prompt · soft negative

“Diligent One Platform (formerly HighBond) – Mixed Reviews” GLM 4.7 FlashX · GRC · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Diligent One, over the 42 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Diligent One was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

MetricStream34 of 426Not in the top three

Archer33 of 421Not in the top three

ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management26 of 427Not in the top three

AuditBoard18 of 420Not in the top three

Vanta15 of 421Not in the top three

LogicGate15 of 420Not in the top three

Riskonnect15 of 420Not in the top three

OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management14 of 421Not in the top three

ProcessUnity13 of 424Not in the top three

IBM OpenPages13 of 420Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Diligent One. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 36 of the 42 answers that named Diligent One and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com22

riskonnect.com20

expertinsights.com19

vanta.com17

optro.ai14

metricstream.com13

apono.io12

diligent.comYour site10

learn.g2.com10

upguard.com10

137 of the 147 domain citations in answers naming Diligent One came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

expertinsights.com/compliance/the-top-governance-risk-compliance-grc-platforms15

apono.io/blog/top-10-governance-risk-and-compliance-grc-software-solutions12

riskonnect.com/best-grc-software-platforms-202610

riskonnect.com/best-third-party-risk-management-software-platforms-in-20269

upguard.com/blog/best-third-party-risk-management-software-solutions9

bitsight.com/guides/best-third-party-risk-management-platforms-for-enterprises8

orbiqhq.com/compliance-automation/best-grc-software8

vanta.com/resources/best-tprm-software-for-enterprises8

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Diligent One

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Diligent One; a claim can dispute any of them.

Diligent 7Diligent (Diligent One Platform) 1Diligent (Galvanize) 1Diligent HighBond 1Diligent One (HighBond) 1Diligent One Platform (formerly HighBond) 1Diligent One/HighBond 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Diligent One's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Diligent One, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at diligent.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.