Attack surface management for small business buyers
Asked as “attack surface management platform”, and as “external attack surface monitoring tool”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 58 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
26%
Contested · Attaxion 19%
26Intruder19Attaxion07Detectify48others
26% of first choices, contested.
Since September 2026▼−23Since September 2026: 52% → 29%, −23 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.Intruder held the lead, −23 points on 52%, past the floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Intruder26%Contested▼−23Since September 2026: 52% → 29%, −23 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageMid-marketIntruder49%Clear leader▼−6Since September 2026: 59% → 53%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Enterprise
Cortex Xpanse29%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Cortex Xpanse (28%) replaces Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management (21% then, 17% now), 11 points clear, past the 11-point floor.Standing →
Intruder26%Contested▼−23Since September 2026: 52% → 29%, −23 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageMid-marketIntruder49%Clear leader▼−6Since September 2026: 59% → 53%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →EnterpriseCortex Xpanse29%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Cortex Xpanse (28%) replaces Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management (21% then, 17% now), 11 points clear, past the 11-point floor.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Intruder26%0%44accepted challenger▼−23Since September 2026: 52% → 29%, −23 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.52% → 29%
Intruder26%0%44accepted challenger▼−23Since September 2026: 52% → 29%, −23 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.52% → 29%02
Attaxion19%0%27accepted challenger▲+14Since September 2026: 2% → 16%, +14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 16%
Attaxion19%0%27accepted challenger▲+14Since September 2026: 2% → 16%, +14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 16%03
Detectify7%17%30accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 6% → 8%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 8%
Detectify7%17%30accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 6% → 8%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 8%04
Halo Security5%0%11accepted challenger▲+6Since September 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 6%
Halo Security5%0%11accepted challenger▲+6Since September 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 6%06
Censys ASM5%38%16criticized challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 6%
Censys ASM5%38%16criticized challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 6%07
UpGuard BreachSight3%17%24accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 4%
UpGuard BreachSight3%17%24accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 4%08
PortWarden3%0%11accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 4%
PortWarden3%0%11accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 4%09
Tenable Attack Surface Management3%60%15criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 4%
Tenable Attack Surface Management3%60%15criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 4%10
Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management2%36%28criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%
Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management2%36%28criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%11
Wiz2%54%13criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Wiz2%54%13criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%12
CyCognito2%72%25criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
CyCognito2%72%25criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%Show the one product at 0%, ordered by negative rate
13Cortex Xpanse0%95%21criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Cortex Xpanse0%95%21criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to head
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Intruder vs UpGuard BreachSightIntruder vs DetectifyIntruder vs Tenable Attack Surface ManagementIntruder vs CrowdStrike Falcon SurfaceAttaxion vs Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface ManagementAttaxion vs CyCognitoAttaxion vs UpGuard BreachSightAttaxion vs DetectifyAttaxion vs Tenable Attack Surface ManagementAttaxion vs CrowdStrike Falcon SurfaceMicrosoft Defender External Attack Surface Management vs CyCognitoMicrosoft Defender External Attack Surface Management vs UpGuard BreachSightMicrosoft Defender External Attack Surface Management vs DetectifyMicrosoft Defender External Attack Surface Management vs Tenable Attack Surface ManagementMicrosoft Defender External Attack Surface Management vs CrowdStrike Falcon SurfaceCyCognito vs UpGuard BreachSightCyCognito vs DetectifyCyCognito vs Tenable Attack Surface ManagementCyCognito vs CrowdStrike Falcon SurfaceUpGuard BreachSight vs DetectifyUpGuard BreachSight vs Tenable Attack Surface ManagementUpGuard BreachSight vs CrowdStrike Falcon SurfaceDetectify vs Tenable Attack Surface ManagementDetectify vs CrowdStrike Falcon SurfaceTenable Attack Surface Management vs CrowdStrike Falcon Surface
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01020304
050607080910111213Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Intruder26%
Intruder26%02Attaxion19%
Attaxion19%03Detectify7%
Detectify7%04Halo Security5%
Halo Security5%05SurfaceLoop5%
SurfaceLoop5%06Censys ASM5%
Censys ASM5%07UpGuard BreachSight3%
UpGuard BreachSight3%08PortWarden3%
PortWarden3%09Tenable Attack Surface Management3%
Tenable Attack Surface Management3%10Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management2%
Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management2%11Wiz2%
Wiz2%12CyCognito2%
CyCognito2%13Cortex Xpanse0%
Cortex Xpanse0%What they warned about
Four of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and GPT-6 Luna changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Cortex Xpanse95%
20 of 21 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 10 hard negative
“**Avoid or be cautious about** platforms like **Palo Alto Cortex Xpanse / Mandiant ASM and CyCognito** unless you have a dedicated security team and a significant budget.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management36%
10 of 28 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“"Enterprise-heavy tools (e.g., Microsoft Defender EASM, CrowdStrike Falcon Surface) were excluded" for SMB fit” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
CyCognito72%
18 of 25 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“small businesses should likely steer clear because pricing is not public and could lead to unexpectedly large bills” Mistral Small, negative prompt
CrowdStrike Falcon Surface78%
7 of 9 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“"Not suitable for small businesses" and "Potentially cost-prohibitive for small businesses."” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
81 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1058 links across 190 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 35 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Synack41 answers · 41 citations · 11 models
vendor site · G235 answers · 52 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Wiz33 answers · 38 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Guideflow33 answers · 33 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Attaxion32 answers · 52 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Palo Alto Networks29 answers · 33 citations · 12 models
vendor site · UpGuard25 answers · 32 citations · 8 models
25 answers · 28 citations · 9 models
24 answers · 24 citations · 11 models
24 answers · 24 citations · 11 models
22 answers · 24 citations · 10 models
19 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
41 answers · 11 models
33 answers · 12 models
29 answers · 10 models
27 answers · 11 models
25 answers · 10 models
25 answers · 9 models
24 answers · 11 models
23 answers · 10 models
23 answers · 11 models
22 answers · 10 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “attack surface management platform”, “attack surface management platforms”, “best attack surface management platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intruder intruder.io | 26% | 231 | 27,100 | 8,557 | 49,562 | 43 | ||
| Attaxion attaxion.com | 19% | 46 | 50 | 0 | 1,077 | 6 | ||
| Detectify detectify.com | 7% | 92 | 590 | 4 | 1,393 | 15 | ||
| Halo Security halosecurity.com | 5% | 15 | 1,300 | 99 | 1,163 | $357 | 7 | |
| SurfaceLoop surfaceloop.com | 5% | 13 | 0 | 12 | ||||
| Censys censys.com Censys ASM 5% | 5% | 62 | 30 | 0 | 4,973 company | 43 | ||
| UpGuard upguard.com UpGuard BreachSight 3%, UpGuard Breach Risk Self-Service 2% | 5% | 114 | 2,900 | 80 | 319,457 company | 25 | 8 | |
| PortWarden portwarden.io | 3% | 13 | 10 | 0 | 0 | |||
| Aikido aikido.dev Aikido Security 3% | 3% | 342 | 2,400 | 51 | 6,442 company | $936 | 120 | |
| Tenable parent site Tenable Attack Surface Management 3% | 3% | 63 | 27,100 | 1,194 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 21 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (attaxion.com, paloaltonetworks.com, synack.com, upguard.com). The first result for “attack surface management platform” is sentinelone.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best attack surface management platform for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which external attack surface monitoring tool would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top attack surface management platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best attack surface management platform for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating an attack surface management platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which attack surface management platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Attaxion, DetectifyDetectifyChangedAttaxion, Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface ManagementAttaxionno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
CyCognito, Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface ManagementOne alternative
IntruderOne alternative
CyCognitoTwo alternatives
HostedScan, IntruderGPT-5.4 miniRapid7 Surface Commandagainst: CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure ManagementTenable Attack Surface ManagementChangedIntruderagainst: WizTenable Attack Surface Managementagainst: CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management, Rapid7 Commandno first choiceagainst: Censys ASM, Shodan
One alternative
Censys Attack Surface ManagementTwo alternatives
Bitsight, CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure ManagementThree alternatives
Aikido Security, Censys ASM, Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface ManagementOne alternative
Censys ASMGemini 3.5 FlashIntruderagainst: Cortex Xpanse, CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management, CyCognitoIntruderHeldAttaxionagainst: Cortex Xpanse, CyCognitoAttaxion, ProjectDiscovery Cloud Platformagainst: Cortex Xpanse, CyCognito, IBM RandoriDetectify, Halo Security, Intruderagainst: Cortex Xpanse, CyCognitoagainst: Censys ASM, CrowdStrike Falcon Surface, CyCognito, Google Cloud, IBM Randori, Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management, Palo Alto Networks, Shodan, Tenable Attack Surface Management
Three alternatives
Aikido Security, Detectify, UpGuard BreachSightFour alternatives
Attaxion, Bitsight, Halo Security, SecurityScorecardFour alternatives
Detectify, Intruder, ProjectDiscovery Cloud Platform, UpGuard BreachSightSeven alternatives
Intruder, Mangudai Security, Naabu, Nuclei, OWASP Amass, Subfinder, reNginePerplexity SonarCyCognitoagainst: Cortex XpanseIntruderChangedIntruderagainst: CloudSEK, Cortex Xpanse, IONIXAikido Security, Censys ASMagainst: Wizno first choiceagainst: Bugcrowd Attack Surface Management platform, CrowdStrike Falcon Surface, Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management, Reflectiz, UpGuard BreachSight
One alternative
DetectifyThree alternatives
Detectify, Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management, UpGuard BreachSightThree alternatives
CyCognito, Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management, UpGuard BreachSightGrok 4.1 FastSurfaceLoopagainst: CrowdStrike, WizIntruderChangedagainst: Bitsight, WizIntruderagainst: CrowdStrike Falcon, CyCognito, Palo Alto Cortex, Qualys External Attack Surface Management, Tenable Attack Surface ManagementIntelliBreach Attack Surface Managementagainst: Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management, Rapid7, Tenable Attack Surface ManagementCensys ASM, UpGuard BreachSight, Wizagainst: Bugcrowd, Cortex Xpanse, CrowdStrike Falcon Surface, CyCognito, Qualys, Reflectiz, Resurface Labs, Silent Armor, Tenable Attack Surface Management, UpGuard BreachSight, Wiz
Two alternatives
Attaxion, IntruderThree alternatives
Attaxion, Detectify, SurfaceLoopThree alternatives
Detectify, Halo Security, Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface ManagementFour alternatives
Attack Surface Center, Intruder, PortWarden, bspekaOne alternative
AttaxionMistral SmallHalo Security, Intruderagainst: Detectify, Qualys External Attack Surface ManagementCensys ASM, UpGuard BreachSightChangedCensys ASM, DetectifyAikido Security, Intruderno first choiceagainst: Cortex Xpanse, CrowdStrike Falcon Surface, CyCognito, Mandiant Attack Surface Management, Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management, Tenable Attack Surface Management
Three alternatives
Aikido Security, Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management, Scrut AutomationThree alternatives
ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus, Scrut Automation, Tenable Attack Surface ManagementThree alternatives
Attaxion, Halo Security, ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager PlusFive alternatives
AttackIQ, Axio, Censys ASM, IBM Randori, JupiterOneDeepSeek V4 FlashIntruderagainst: Bitsight, Cortex Xpanse, CyCognitoAttaxionChangedIntruderagainst: Censys Attack Surface Management, CyCognitoAttaxionno first choiceagainst: Censys ASM, Cortex Xpanse, CyCognitoagainst: Cortex Xpanse, CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management, CyCognito, Wiz
Three alternatives
Attaxion, Detectify, runZeroOne alternative
IntruderThree alternatives
Halo Security, Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management, Qualys External Attack Surface ManagementEight alternatives
Detectify, ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus, Nmap, OWASP Amass, OpenVAS, Shodan, SurfaceLoop, reNgineFive alternatives
Attack Surface Agency, PortWarden, SecurityScorecard, Shockwave, UpGuard BreachSightLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldno first choiceHalo Securityno first choiceagainst: Cortex Xpanse, CrowdStrike Falcon Surface, Mandiant Attack Surface Management, Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management
One alternative
SurfaceLoopQwen 3.7 FlashIntruderagainst: CyCognito, Tenable Attack Surface ManagementIntruderHeldIntruderDetectify, PortWardenagainst: Rapid7, Tenable Attack Surface Managementno first choiceagainst: CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management, Palo Alto Networks, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security, Wiz
Three alternatives
Detectify, UpGuard BreachSight, runZeroOne alternative
UpGuard BreachSightThree alternatives
Aikido Security, Saner.io, ScanReviewThree alternatives
Attaxion, Criminal IP, Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface ManagementKimi K2Attaxion, Intruderagainst: Censys ASM, Cortex Xpanse, CyCognito, DetectifyAttaxionChangedagainst: DetectifyIntruderagainst: Cortex Xpanse, Qualys, SecurityScorecard, UpGuard BreachSightIntruder, OASMno first choiceagainst: Cortex Xpanse, CyCognito, Detectifyagainst: Censys ASM, Cortex Xpanse, CyCognito, Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management
Three alternatives
Attack Surface Agency, PortWarden, UpGuard BreachSightOne alternative
IntruderThree alternatives
Attaxion, Detectify, bspekaThree alternatives
Criminal IP, HostedScan, PortWardenGLM 4.7 FlashXAttaxion, IntruderPortWardenChangedMicrosoft Defender External Attack Surface Managementagainst: Censys ASMbspekano first choiceagainst: Cortex Xpanse, CyCognito, Mandiant Attack Surface Management
Three alternatives
Detectify, PortWarden, SurfaceLoopThree alternatives
Intruder, Shodan, UpGuard BreachSightFive alternatives
Attaxion, Pentest-Tools.com, Tenable One Cloud Exposure, UpGuard BreachSight, Wiz ASMThree alternatives
Detectify, HostedScan, IntruderMiniMax M2.5no first choiceIntruder, RiskProfilerChangedHalo Security, Saneragainst: Cortex Xpanseno first choiceno first choiceagainst: Cortex Xpanse, CrowdStrike Falcon Surface, Mandiant Attack Surface Management, Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management, Tenable Attack Surface Management
One alternative
IntruderTwo alternatives
CTM360, CybleOne alternative
AxoniusGPT-6 LunaMicrosoft Defender External Attack Surface ManagementUpGuard Breach Risk Self-ServiceChangedIntruder, Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Managementagainst: Rapid7 Surface Command, Tenable Attack Surface ManagementProjectDiscovery Cloudagainst: HackerTarget, Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Managementno first choiceagainst: Mandiant Attack Surface Management
One alternative
IntruderOne alternative
runZeroTwo alternatives
Detectify, runZeroOne alternative
CISA's free Cyber Hygiene serviceMuse Glimmer 30BAttaxion, SurfaceLoopagainst: Bitsight, CyCognito, SecurityScorecardAttaxion, SurfaceLoopHeldAttaxion, SurfaceLoopAttaxion, Intruderno first choiceagainst: Bugcrowd Attack Surface Management platform, Cortex Xpanse, CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management, CrowdStrike Falcon Surface, Detectify, Mandiant Attack Surface Management, Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management, UpGuard BreachSight
Four alternatives
HostedScan, ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus, Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management, UpGuard BreachSightThree alternatives
Detectify, Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management, UpGuard BreachSightFive alternatives
Bitsight, Detectify, Intruder, PortWarden, UpGuard BreachSightThree alternatives
Criminal IP ASM, Detectify Surface Monitoring, HostedScanBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:24 | yes | 15 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 07:37 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:25 | yes | 17 | 30 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 13:22 | yes | 17 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 13:43 | yes | 23 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:03 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:18 | yes | 17 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:31 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:59 | yes | 10 | 31 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:56 | yes | 20 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 12:04 | yes | 18 | 75 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:33 | yes | 5 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 07:46 | yes | 2 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 13:48 | yes | 14 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:02 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:59 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:36 | yes | 16 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 13:39 | yes | 16 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:23 | yes | 19 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:54 | yes | 6 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:16 | yes | 19 | 34 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:19 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:57 | yes | 16 | 103 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 13:40 | yes | 18 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 13:23 | yes | 23 | 35 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:11 | yes | 6 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 07:39 | yes | 2 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 12:13 | yes | 12 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 07:54 | yes | 15 | 10 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:06 | yes | 4 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:09 | yes | 20 | 28 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:23 | yes | 18 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:36 | yes | 19 | 11 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:10 | yes | 15 | 9 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 13:22 | yes | 22 | 34 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 07:55 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 13:07 | yes | 14 | 72 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 13:03 | yes | 19 | 25 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:43 | yes | 19 | 21 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:41 | yes | 5 | 17 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 07:50 | yes | 5 | 34 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:22 | yes | 14 | 34 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:18 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:40 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 07:43 | yes | 16 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:42 | yes | 16 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:00 | yes | 19 | 13 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:06 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:44 | yes | 22 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:50 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:20 | yes | 9 | 36 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:34 | yes | 21 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 12:35 | yes | 24 | 83 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 13:00 | yes | 5 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:21 | yes | 4 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:57 | yes | 13 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 12:51 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 12:54 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:06 | yes | 12 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 12:25 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:10 | yes | 15 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 12:33 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:06 | yes | 21 | 54 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 13:30 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 12:05 | yes | 5 | 37 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 12:03 | yes | 19 | 31 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:37 | yes | 18 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:49 | yes | 5 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:44 | yes | 4 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:08 | yes | 14 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:04 | yes | 16 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:00 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:18 | yes | 17 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:52 | yes | 18 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 12:50 | yes | 20 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:00 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:32 | yes | 23 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 13:36 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 12:08 | yes | 21 | 57 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 12:02 | yes | 25 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 12:12 | yes | 24 | 35 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:29 | yes | 9 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:47 | yes | 3 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:50 | yes | 20 | 32 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Aikido read as Aikido Security
Attaxion read as Attaxion
Attaxion (Starter Tier) read as Attaxion
BitSight read as Bitsight
Bitsight read as Bitsight
Censys read as Censys ASM
Intruder.io read as Intruder
Intruder.io (Cloud Plan) read as Intruder
SentinelOne read as SentinelOne ASM
Tenable read as Tenable Attack Surface Management
UpGuard read as UpGuard BreachSight
UpGuard (BreachSight) read as UpGuard BreachSight
UpGuard Breach Risk read as UpGuard BreachSight
Unresolved, counted raw
Breach Risk
Bugcrowd Asset Inventory
Detectify Surface Monitoring
HackerTarget
IntelliBreach Attack Surface Management
Mangudai Security
Naabu
Praetorian Chariot (Freemium)
ProjectDiscovery Cloud
Rapid7 Command
Resurface Labs
RiskProfiler - External Threat Exposure Management
Saner
Saner Continuous Vulnerability and Exposure Management
Saner.io
ScanReview
Silent Armor
Tenable One Cloud Exposure
UpGuard Breach Risk Self-Service
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.