Every category where a model named Tenable Attack Surface Management for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Attack surface management	Security operations	0%	26 of 104	25%	8	under 10 labels · led by Intruder at 59%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Tenable Attack Surface Management yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Tenable Attack Surface Management across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	2	0	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase5 labels1

Comparative12 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative11 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative34 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best if you want exposure management with strong vulnerability-management tie-in” GPT-5.4 mini · ASM · direct prompt · alternative

“Best for: Organizations that already use Tenable's VM/cloud tools.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · ASM · comparative prompt · alternative

“strongest when paired with Tenable One” GPT-5.4 mini · ASM · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Tenable ASM is described as unified VM + ASM, which can be useful, but it should be evaluated carefully if your main need is deep external discovery.” Perplexity Sonar · ASM · negative prompt · soft negative

“Some G2/Gartner mentions of alert fatigue in comparisons; setup/group policies tricky initially” Grok 4.1 Fast · ASM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Tenable Attack Surface Management, over the 34 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Tenable Attack Surface Management was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Cortex Xpanse29 of 345Not in the top three

Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management25 of 343Not in the top three

CyCognito22 of 343Not in the top three

Censys ASM21 of 340Not in the top three

Bitsight13 of 342Not in the top three

Detectify12 of 341Not in the top three

CrowdStrike Falcon Surface12 of 340Not in the top three

Synack11 of 343Not in the top three

IONIX10 of 341Not in the top three

Wiz10 of 341Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Tenable Attack Surface Management. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 31 of the 34 answers that named Tenable Attack Surface Management and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

synack.com23

upguard.com23

bitsight.com18

wiz.io16

paloaltonetworks.com15

guptadeepak.com13

g2.com11

gartner.com11

ionix.io10

guideflow.com9

149 of the 149 domain citations in answers naming Tenable Attack Surface Management came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

synack.com/blog/best-attack-surface-management-tools23

upguard.com/blog/best-attack-surface-management-software-solutions23

bitsight.com/guides/best-external-attack-surface-management-platforms-for-global-enterpris16

wiz.io/academy/cloud-security/attack-surface-management-tools15

guptadeepak.com/tools/top-10-attack-surface-management-tools-202612

paloaltonetworks.com/cyberpedia/asm-tools-comparison12

gartner.com/reviews/market/external-attack-surface-management9

guideflow.com/blog/attack-surface-management-software9

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Tenable Attack Surface Management

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Tenable Attack Surface Management; a claim can dispute any of them.

Tenable ASM 3Tenable ASM (Tenable One) 1Tenable One ASM 1Tenable One Attack Surface Management 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Tenable Attack Surface Management's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Tenable Attack Surface Management, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at tenable.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.