UpGuard · 2 categories · RankedUpGuard BreachSight
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Digital risk protection | Security operations | 22% | 1 of 86 | 5% | 21 | accepted challenger | |
| Attack surface management | Security operations | 6% | 5 of 100 | 18% | 17 | accepted challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
By model
How each model treated UpGuard BreachSight across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“UpGuard is the most frequently named fit for consolidated DRP + vendor / user risk outcomes without multiple point tools” Muse Glimmer 30B · DRP · direct prompt · first choice
“UpGuard is frequently highlighted as a top digital risk protection (DRP) platform for mid-market B2B companies” Mistral Small · DRP · direct prompt · first choice
“I would recommend UpGuard because: ✅ Specifically built for mid-market” MiniMax M2.5 · DRP · direct prompt · first choice
“the strongest default choice is Rapid7 Threat Command or UpGuard” Perplexity Sonar · DRP · direct prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid at all costs (for your budget): Enterprise platforms like BitSight, UpGuard” DeepSeek V4 Flash · ASM · budget prompt · hard negative
“What to avoid ... UpGuard BreachSight: $5,999/year minimum.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · DRP · budget prompt · hard negative
“aggregates asset data but lacks native capabilities for active vulnerability scanning or attack surface validation” Claude Haiku 4.5 · ASM · negative prompt · soft negative
“High-severity alerts often not actionable (investigation overhead); limited report/alert customization” Grok 4.20 · ASM · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as UpGuard BreachSight, over the 114 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and UpGuard BreachSight was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 114 of the 114 answers that named UpGuard BreachSight and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
371 of the 458 domain citations in answers naming UpGuard BreachSight came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where UpGuard BreachSight stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 10 a month (“upguard breachsight”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Its company's site
- upguard.com shared with UpGuard's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 319,457 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 27,900 · 1,457 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 12,517
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This edition- Named in
- 114 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 114 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as UpGuard BreachSight
Follow UpGuard BreachSight
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
UpGuard is the company behind UpGuard BreachSight.ShowHide
The company
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- A complete cyber risk posture management platform.
- For
- security teams
- Price stated
- Free trial upguard.com/product/breach-risk
- Starting price
- null upguard.com/product/breach-risk
- Free plan or trial
- Free trial upguard.com/platform
- Integrations claimed
- 400 upguard.com/product/breach-risk
- Customers named
- Games24x7Camp Systems
- Not stated on the pages read
- Certifications, hosting
What UpGuard BreachSight's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: upguard.com/platform, upguard.com/product/breach-risk, upguard.com/releases/breachsight-monthly-email-digest, help.upguard.com/en/what-is-upguard-breach-risks-threat-monitoring, help.upguard.com/en/what-is-included-in-upguards-self-service-breach-risk-plans. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when UpGuard BreachSight's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as UpGuard BreachSight, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for UpGuard BreachSight by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where UpGuard BreachSight is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name UpGuard BreachSight, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where UpGuard BreachSight is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
AI models recommend UpGuard BreachSight first in Digital risk protection this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.