Small business▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 17 → 7 of 93
1 category · RankedPortWarden
13Judge labels
2First choices
0Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
3% in ASM for small business buyers
Rank 27 of 100 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 2 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business8 of 99
3%11 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market27 of 100
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In asm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named PortWarden for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Attack surface management | Security operations | 0% | 27 of 100 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Intruder at 49% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, PortWarden held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · ASM · by segment
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 50 of 98, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASM | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 27 of 100, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated PortWarden across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated PortWarden across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 label1
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained5 labels1
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative2 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“PortWarden is marketed explicitly for small business teams: "Best for small business teams."” Muse Glimmer 30B · ASM · budget prompt · alternative
“This is ideal if you have no internal security staff.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · ASM · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as PortWarden, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and PortWarden was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as PortWarden, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and PortWarden was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named PortWarden. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 13 answers that named PortWarden and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
scanreview.io13
attaxion.com10
guideflow.com9
geekflare.com7
thectoclub.com7
itechguides.com6
paloaltonetworks.com6
synack.com6
slashdot.org5
technologyadvice.com5
Seventy-four of the seventy-four domain citations in answers naming PortWarden came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
portwarden.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, PortWarden takes 0% of first choices and Intruder takes 49%.ShowHide
Search and answers
portwarden.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, PortWarden takes 0% of first choices and Intruder takes 49%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “attack surface management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “attack surface management platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 10 a month (“portwarden”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 0 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1 · 0 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 13
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 27 of 100 in ASM
Segment leader
49%
Intruder
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 13 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 13 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on portwarden.io
43
subdomains included
Content
25
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 23 | 0 | 2026-06-22 | ASM | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-06-22Pentest snapshot monitoring drift blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page portwarden.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow PortWarden
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
PortWarden is its own company.ShowHide
The company
PortWarden is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- External attack surface management for SMBs and lean IT teams.
- For
- small businesses, technical founders, MSPs, and lean IT teams
- Price stated
- Pricing is per endpoint. portwarden.io
- Starting price
- 0 portwarden.io/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Free monitoring for up to 3 endpoints. No credit card required. portwarden.io
- Hosting
- AmericasUS-only infrastructureUnited States
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, certifications, customers
What PortWarden's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: portwarden.io, portwarden.io/pricing, portwarden.io/compliance. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when PortWarden's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as PortWarden, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for PortWarden by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where PortWarden is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name PortWarden, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.